Suppr超能文献

对“豌豆植物中不存在联想学习的证据”一文的评论的回应。

Response to comment on 'Lack of evidence for associative learning in pea plants'.

机构信息

Department of Plant Biology, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States.

出版信息

Elife. 2020 Sep 10;9:e61689. doi: 10.7554/eLife.61689.

Abstract

In 2016 Gagliano et al. reported evidence for associative learning in plants (Gagliano et al., 2016). A subsequent attempt to replicate this finding by the present author was not successful (Markel, 2020). Gagliano et al. attribute this lack of replication to differences in the experimental set-ups used in the original work and the replication attempt (Gagliano et al., 2020). Here, based on a comparison of the two set-ups, I argue that these differences are unable to explain the lack of replication in Markel, 2020.

摘要

2016 年,Gagliano 等人报告了植物联想学习的证据(Gagliano 等人,2016)。随后,作者本人试图重复这一发现,但并未成功(Markel,2020)。Gagliano 等人将这种无法复制的现象归因于原始工作和复制尝试中实验设置的差异(Gagliano 等人,2020)。在这里,我通过对这两个设置的比较,认为这些差异并不能解释 Markel,2020 中无法复制的原因。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e94/7556859/20aed1405264/elife-61689-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验