J Patient Saf. 2022 Jan 1;18(1):e315-e319. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000769.
The out-of-hospital environment can pose significant challenges to the quality and safety of interhospital transport of critically ill patients. Because we lack knowledge of the occurrence of incidents, their potential consequences, and whether they are actually reported, this study was initiated.
Two different services in Norway were asked to self-report incidents after every interhospital transport of critically ill patients. Sampling lasted for 12 and 8 months, respectively. An expert group evaluated each incident for severity and demand for reporting into the hospital's electronic incident reporting system. One year later, the hospital's reporting system was scrutinized to determine the number of incidents actually reported.
A total of 455 transports of critically ill patients were performed, resulting in 294 unique incidents reported: medical (15%), technical (25%), missing equipment (17%), and personal failures and communication difficulties (42%). Only 3 (1%) of the 294 unique incidents were actually reported in the hospital's electronic incident reporting system. The experts were inconsistent in which incidents should have been reported and to what degree checklists, standard operating procedures, simulation, and training could have prevented the incidents.
This study of interhospital transports of critically ill patients reveals a very high number of incidents. Despite this fact, these incidents are severely underreported in the hospital's electronic incident reporting system. This suggests that learning is lost and errors with predominant probability are repeated. These results emphasize the existing challenges in regard to the quality and safety of interhospital transport of critically ill patients.
院外环境可能对危重症患者的院间转运的质量和安全造成重大挑战。由于我们缺乏对事件发生、潜在后果以及是否实际报告的了解,因此开展了这项研究。
挪威的两个不同服务部门被要求在每次危重症患者的院间转运后报告事件。抽样时间分别为 12 个月和 8 个月。一个专家组评估了每个事件的严重程度,并评估其是否需要报告给医院的电子事件报告系统。一年后,仔细检查医院的报告系统,以确定实际报告的事件数量。
共进行了 455 次危重症患者转运,报告了 294 个独特的事件:医疗(15%)、技术(25%)、设备缺失(17%)以及个人失误和沟通困难(42%)。在医院的电子事件报告系统中,只有 3 个(1%)独特事件实际报告。专家们对哪些事件应该报告以及清单、标准操作程序、模拟和培训可以在多大程度上预防事件存在分歧。
本研究揭示了院间转运危重症患者的事件数量非常高。尽管如此,这些事件在医院的电子事件报告系统中严重漏报。这表明学习机会丧失,并且极有可能重复出现错误。这些结果强调了在危重症患者的院间转运的质量和安全方面存在的现有挑战。