• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在英格兰,改善六种高心血管风险疾病的检测与管理能带来哪些成本节约和健康益处?一项经济学评估。

What are the cost-savings and health benefits of improving detection and management for six high cardiovascular risk conditions in England? An economic evaluation.

作者信息

Thomas Chloe, Brennan Alan, Goka Edward, Squires Hazel Y, Brenner Gilly, Bagguley David, Buckley Woods Helen, Gillett Michael, Leaviss Joanna, Clowes Mark, Heathcote Laura, Cooper Katy, Breeze Penny

机构信息

School of Health & Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

School of Health & Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 10;10(9):e037486. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037486.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037486
PMID:32912949
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7488844/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the cost savings and health benefits of improving detection of individuals at high risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in England, to determine to which patient subgroups these benefits arise, and to compare different strategies for subsequent management.

DESIGN

An economic analysis using the School for Public Health Research CVD Prevention Model.

SETTING

England 2018.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults aged 16 and older with one or more high cardiovascular risk conditions, including hypertension, diabetes, non-diabetic hyperglycaemia, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease and high cholesterol.

INTERVENTIONS

Detection of 100% of individuals with CVD high risk conditions compared with current levels of detection in England. Detected individuals are assumed to be managed either according to current levels of care or National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Incremental and cumulative costs, savings, quality adjusted life years (QALYs), CVD cases, and net monetary benefit, from a UK NHS and Personal Social Services perspective.

RESULTS

£68 billion could be saved, 4.9 million QALYs gained and 3.4 million cases of CVD prevented over 25 years if all individuals in England with the six CVD high risk conditions were diagnosed and subsequently managed at current levels. Additionally, if all detected individuals were managed according to NICE guidelines, total savings would be £61 billion, 8.1 million QALYs would be gained and 5.2 million CVD cases prevented. Most benefits come from detection of high cholesterol in the short term and diabetes in the long term.

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial cost savings and health benefits would accrue if all individuals with conditions that increase CVD risk could be diagnosed, with detection of undiagnosed diabetes producing greatest benefits. Ensuring all conditions are managed according to NICE guidelines would further increase health benefits. Projected cost-savings could be invested in developing acceptable and cost-effective solutions for improving detection and management.

摘要

目标

评估在英格兰改善心血管疾病(CVD)高危个体检测所带来的成本节约和健康效益,确定这些效益产生于哪些患者亚组,并比较后续管理的不同策略。

设计

使用公共卫生研究学院的心血管疾病预防模型进行经济分析。

背景

2018年的英格兰。

参与者

16岁及以上患有一种或多种心血管高危疾病的成年人,包括高血压、糖尿病、非糖尿病性高血糖、心房颤动、慢性肾脏病和高胆固醇。

干预措施

与英格兰当前的检测水平相比,对100%患有心血管疾病高危疾病的个体进行检测。假定对检测出的个体按照当前的护理水平或英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)的指南进行管理。

主要结局指标

从英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)和个人社会服务的角度来看,增量成本和累积成本、节约的费用、质量调整生命年(QALYs)、心血管疾病病例数以及净货币效益。

结果

如果英格兰所有患有六种心血管疾病高危疾病的个体都能被诊断出来并随后按照当前水平进行管理,那么在25年内可节省680亿英镑,获得490万个质量调整生命年,并预防340万例心血管疾病。此外,如果所有检测出的个体都按照NICE指南进行管理,总节约费用将为610亿英镑,将获得810万个质量调整生命年,并预防520万例心血管疾病。大多数效益在短期内来自高胆固醇的检测,长期内来自糖尿病的检测。

结论

如果所有患有增加心血管疾病风险疾病的个体都能被诊断出来,将会带来可观的成本节约和健康效益,未诊断出的糖尿病的检测产生的效益最大。确保所有疾病都按照NICE指南进行管理将进一步提高健康效益。预计节省的成本可用于投资开发可接受且具有成本效益的解决方案,以改善检测和管理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eadf/7488844/e3148be62e58/bmjopen-2020-037486f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eadf/7488844/828358d63757/bmjopen-2020-037486f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eadf/7488844/e3148be62e58/bmjopen-2020-037486f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eadf/7488844/828358d63757/bmjopen-2020-037486f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eadf/7488844/e3148be62e58/bmjopen-2020-037486f02.jpg

相似文献

1
What are the cost-savings and health benefits of improving detection and management for six high cardiovascular risk conditions in England? An economic evaluation.在英格兰,改善六种高心血管风险疾病的检测与管理能带来哪些成本节约和健康益处?一项经济学评估。
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 10;10(9):e037486. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037486.
2
Assessing the potential return on investment of the proposed UK NHS diabetes prevention programme in different population subgroups: an economic evaluation.评估英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)拟议的糖尿病预防计划在不同人群亚组中的潜在投资回报率:一项经济评估。
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 21;7(8):e014953. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014953.
3
Predicting the impact of population level risk reduction in cardio-vascular disease and stroke on acute hospital admission rates over a 5 year period--a pilot study.预测5年内心血管疾病和中风的人群水平风险降低对急性住院率的影响——一项试点研究。
Public Health. 2006 Dec;120(12):1140-8. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2006.10.012. Epub 2006 Nov 3.
4
The Impact of Including Costs and Outcomes of Dementia in a Health Economic Model to Evaluate Lifestyle Interventions to Prevent Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease.将痴呆的成本和结果纳入健康经济模型中评估预防糖尿病和心血管疾病的生活方式干预的影响。
Med Decis Making. 2020 Oct;40(7):912-923. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20946758. Epub 2020 Sep 19.
5
Benefits of population-level interventions for dementia risk factors: an economic modelling study for England.人群水平干预措施对痴呆风险因素的益处:英格兰的经济建模研究。
Lancet Healthy Longev. 2024 Sep;5(9):100611. doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00117-X. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
6
The current and potential health benefits of the National Health Service Health Check cardiovascular disease prevention programme in England: A microsimulation study.英格兰国民保健署健康检查心血管疾病预防计划的当前和潜在健康益处:一项微观模拟研究。
PLoS Med. 2018 Mar 6;15(3):e1002517. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002517. eCollection 2018 Mar.
7
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interventions that cause weight loss and reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease.导致体重减轻并降低心血管疾病风险的干预措施的有效性和成本效益。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017 Jan;19(1):118-124. doi: 10.1111/dom.12792. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
8
Gaps in antihypertensive and statin treatments and benefits of optimisation: a modelling study in a 1 million ethnically diverse urban population in UK.降压和他汀类药物治疗的差距以及优化的益处:英国 100 万种族多样化城市人群中的建模研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 30;11(12):e052884. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052884.
9
Health Impact and Cost-Effectiveness of Achieving the National Salt and Sugar Reduction Initiative Voluntary Sugar Reduction Targets in the United States: A Microsimulation Study.实现美国国家减盐减糖计划自愿减糖目标对健康的影响和成本效益:一项微观模拟研究。
Circulation. 2021 Oct 26;144(17):1362-1376. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.053678. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
10
What will the cardiovascular disease slowdown cost? Modelling the impact of CVD trends on dementia, disability, and economic costs in England and Wales from 2020-2029.心血管疾病放缓会带来什么代价?建模 2020-2029 年英格兰和威尔士心血管疾病趋势对痴呆症、残疾和经济成本的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 29;17(6):e0268766. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268766. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Highlights from the Manifesto on the Health Economics of Cardiovascular Disease Prevention.《心血管疾病预防健康经济学宣言》要点
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 Sep 8. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01537-5.
2
A dual domain systematic review and meta-analysis of risk tool accuracy to predict cardiovascular morbidity in prehypertension and diabetic morbidity in prediabetes.一项双领域系统评价与荟萃分析:评估预测高血压前期心血管疾病发病率及糖尿病前期糖尿病发病率的风险工具的准确性
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 22;16:1527092. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1527092. eCollection 2025.
3
Expert consensus on solutions to improve implementation of NICE type 2 diabetes guideline (NG28) by health systems in England: a Delphi panel by the INNOVATE-28 Working Group.

本文引用的文献

1
The current and potential health benefits of the National Health Service Health Check cardiovascular disease prevention programme in England: A microsimulation study.英格兰国民保健署健康检查心血管疾病预防计划的当前和潜在健康益处:一项微观模拟研究。
PLoS Med. 2018 Mar 6;15(3):e1002517. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002517. eCollection 2018 Mar.
2
Statin initiations and QRISK2 scoring in UK general practice: a THIN database study.他汀类药物的起始使用和 QRISK2 评分在英国普通实践中的应用:THIN 数据库研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Dec;67(665):e881-e887. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X693485. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
3
Assessing the potential return on investment of the proposed UK NHS diabetes prevention programme in different population subgroups: an economic evaluation.
关于英格兰卫生系统改进国家卫生与临床优化研究所2型糖尿病指南(NG28)实施情况的解决方案的专家共识:创新28工作组的德尔菲小组。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 26;15(6):e093955. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093955.
4
[Cardiovascular prevention in Saxony-Anhalt : Necessity and new perspectives].[萨克森-安哈尔特州的心血管疾病预防:必要性与新视角]
Inn Med (Heidelb). 2024 Nov;65(11):1137-1146. doi: 10.1007/s00108-024-01789-x. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
5
Cost-effectiveness of a novel AI technology to quantify coronary inflammation and cardiovascular risk in patients undergoing routine coronary computed tomography angiography.一种新型人工智能技术在接受常规冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影的患者中量化冠状动脉炎症和心血管风险的成本效益。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2025 Jun 23;11(4):434-444. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae085.
6
Clinical Considerations for Healthcare Provider-Administered Lipid-Lowering Medications.临床医护人员给予降脂药物的考虑因素。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2024 Nov;24(6):729-741. doi: 10.1007/s40256-024-00665-1. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
7
Relationships between sodium, fats and carbohydrates on blood pressure, cholesterol and HbA1c: an umbrella review of systematic reviews.钠、脂肪和碳水化合物与血压、胆固醇及糖化血红蛋白之间的关系:系统评价的伞状综述
BMJ Nutr Prev Health. 2024 Mar 21;7(1):191-203. doi: 10.1136/bmjnph-2023-000666. eCollection 2024.
8
NHS Health Check attendance is associated with reduced multiorgan disease risk: a matched cohort study in the UK Biobank.NHS 健康检查的参与与降低多器官疾病风险相关:英国生物银行的匹配队列研究。
BMC Med. 2024 Jan 23;22(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-03187-w.
9
Twenty years on from the introduction of the high risk strategy for stroke and cardiovascular disease prevention: a systematic scoping review.高风险策略引入预防中风和心血管疾病 20 年后:系统范围界定审查。
Eur J Neurol. 2024 Mar;31(3):e16157. doi: 10.1111/ene.16157. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
10
Transforming global approaches to chronic disease prevention and management across the lifespan: integrating genomics, behavior change, and digital health solutions.在整个生命周期中转变全球慢性病预防和管理方法:整合基因组学、行为改变和数字健康解决方案。
Front Public Health. 2023 Oct 13;11:1248254. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1248254. eCollection 2023.
评估英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)拟议的糖尿病预防计划在不同人群亚组中的潜在投资回报率:一项经济评估。
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 21;7(8):e014953. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014953.
4
Cost-effectiveness of population-based, community, workplace and individual policies for diabetes prevention in the UK.基于人群、社区、工作场所和个人政策预防英国糖尿病的成本效益。
Diabet Med. 2017 Aug;34(8):1136-1144. doi: 10.1111/dme.13349. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
5
The impact of Type 2 diabetes prevention programmes based on risk-identification and lifestyle intervention intensity strategies: a cost-effectiveness analysis.基于风险识别和生活方式干预强度策略的2型糖尿病预防项目的影响:一项成本效益分析
Diabet Med. 2017 May;34(5):632-640. doi: 10.1111/dme.13314. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
6
Cost effectiveness of case-finding strategies for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a modelling study.心血管疾病一级预防病例发现策略的成本效益:一项建模研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Jan;67(654):e67-e77. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X687973. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
7
Cardiovascular screening to reduce the burden from cardiovascular disease: microsimulation study to quantify policy options.心血管疾病筛查以减轻心血管疾病负担:量化政策选项的微观模拟研究
BMJ. 2016 Jun 8;353:i2793. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i2793.
8
2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: The Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR).2016年欧洲临床实践心血管疾病预防指南:欧洲心脏病学会和其他学会关于临床实践心血管疾病预防的第六联合工作组(由10个学会的代表和特邀专家组成)由欧洲心血管预防与康复协会(EACPR)特别贡献制定。
Eur Heart J. 2016 Aug 1;37(29):2315-2381. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw106. Epub 2016 May 23.
9
Impact of the National Health Service Health Check on cardiovascular disease risk: a difference-in-differences matching analysis.国家卫生服务健康检查对心血管疾病风险的影响:差异分析匹配分析。
CMAJ. 2016 Jul 12;188(10):E228-E238. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.151201. Epub 2016 May 2.
10
Coverage of a national cardiovascular risk assessment and management programme (NHS Health Check): Retrospective database study.一项全国心血管风险评估与管理项目(国民健康服务健康检查)的覆盖情况:回顾性数据库研究
Prev Med. 2015 Sep;78:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.05.022. Epub 2015 Jun 4.