Suppr超能文献

边缘啮齿动物管理中的困境——荷兰害虫防治人员的态度

Dilemmas in the Management of Liminal Rodents-Attitudes of Dutch Pest Controllers.

作者信息

van Gerwen Maite A A M, Nieuwland Joachim, van Lith Hein A, Meijboom Franck L B

机构信息

Centre for Sustainable Animal Stewardship (CenSAS), Department Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 2, 3584 CM Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Section Laboratory Animal Science/3Rs-Centre, Unit Animals in Science and Society, Department Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 2, 3584 CM Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2020 Sep 9;10(9):1614. doi: 10.3390/ani10091614.

Abstract

When non-human animals are labeled as 'pests', their moral status and welfare seem relatively unimportant. In a multi-stakeholder project, we develop an assessment frame for a more responsible rodent management that includes animal welfare. An online survey among 129 Dutch pest controllers was carried out in order to find out more about pest controllers' attitudes about animal welfare. Respondents indicate to consider animal welfare in their job. They see differences in the welfare impact of different rodent control methods. A dilemma may occur when methods with a high impact, such as rodenticides, are ofttimes used in practice. Respondents also indicate that in different real-life scenarios (the hospital kitchen vs. the private backyard), a different weight may be attributed to the importance of animal welfare. Almost half of the respondents encounter difficulties when weighing animals against human interests. The problems are mainly related to clients who are not willing to invest sufficient money in preventive methods, where respondents do believe in. Some differences were found between respondents depending on membership of a professional association for pest controllers. The results of this study are relevant input for focus groups with pest controllers and their clients and for the development of the aforementioned assessment frame.

摘要

当非人类动物被贴上“害虫”的标签时,它们的道德地位和福利似乎相对不那么重要。在一个多方利益相关者项目中,我们为更负责任的啮齿动物管理制定了一个评估框架,其中包括动物福利。我们对129名荷兰害虫防治人员进行了一项在线调查,以便更深入地了解害虫防治人员对动物福利的态度。受访者表示在工作中会考虑动物福利。他们看到了不同啮齿动物控制方法对福利影响的差异。当高影响的方法,如杀鼠剂,在实际中经常被使用时,可能会出现两难境地。受访者还指出,在不同的现实生活场景中(医院厨房与私人后院),动物福利的重要性可能会被赋予不同的权重。几乎一半的受访者在权衡动物与人类利益时遇到困难。这些问题主要与那些不愿意在预防性方法上投入足够资金的客户有关,而受访者确实相信这些方法。根据是否属于害虫防治人员专业协会,受访者之间存在一些差异。这项研究的结果是与害虫防治人员及其客户的焦点小组以及上述评估框架的制定相关的重要投入。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1cd/7552245/01f07db1b9ca/animals-10-01614-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验