Muñoz-Moldes Santiago, Cleeremans Axel
Consciousness, Cognition and Computation group, Center for Research in Cognition & Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Education, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1050 Brussels, Belgium; Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Consciousness, Cognition and Computation group, Center for Research in Cognition & Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Education, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 Nov;118:681-688. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.09.003. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
Neurofeedback allows humans to self-regulate neural activity in specific brain regions and is considered a promising tool for psychiatric interventions. Recently, methods have been developed to use neurofeedback implicitly, prompting a theoretical debate on the role of awareness in neurofeedback learning. We offer a critical review of the role of awareness in neurofeedback learning, with a special focus on recently developed neurofeedback paradigms. We detail differences in instructions and propose a fine-grained categorization of tasks based on the degree of involvement of explicit and implicit processes. Finally, we review the methods used to measure awareness in neurofeedback and propose new candidate measures. We conclude that explicit processes cannot be eschewed in most current implicit tasks that have explicit goals, and suggest ways in which awareness could be better measured in the future. Investigating awareness during learning will help understand the learning mechanisms underlying neurofeedback learning and will help shape future tasks.
神经反馈使人类能够自我调节特定脑区的神经活动,被认为是一种很有前景的精神疾病干预工具。最近,已经开发出了隐式使用神经反馈的方法,引发了一场关于意识在神经反馈学习中作用的理论辩论。我们对意识在神经反馈学习中的作用进行了批判性综述,特别关注最近开发的神经反馈范式。我们详细说明了指导语的差异,并根据显式和隐式过程的参与程度提出了一种细粒度的任务分类。最后,我们回顾了用于测量神经反馈中意识的方法,并提出了新的候选测量方法。我们得出结论,在大多数具有明确目标的当前隐式任务中,显式过程不能被回避,并建议了未来可以更好地测量意识的方法。研究学习过程中的意识将有助于理解神经反馈学习的潜在机制,并有助于塑造未来的任务。