Rudd P, Byyny R L, Zachary V, LoVerde M E, Mitchell W D, Titus C, Marshall G
Department of Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, California 94305-5475.
Am J Hypertens. 1988 Jul;1(3 Pt 1):309-12. doi: 10.1093/ajh/1.3.309.
To evaluate pill counts as a compliance measure for drug trials, we followed 121 ambulatory hypertensives selected for good compliance over less than or equal to 12 months. The medication regimens consisted of either pinacidil or hydralazine as monotherapy or with propranolol and/or hydrochlorothiazide. Pill counts for the two primary drugs were obtained at each of the 20 return visits. The population was characterized by chronic uncomplicated hypertension and sociodemographic diversity; mean age was 53 years. Despite excellent average weekly pill counts (overall mean compliance rate [+/- SD] = 96.0 +/- 13.2%), we observed large intersubject and intrasubject variance in weekly pill count assessment: individuals' mean standard deviation = 13.7% (range = 0%-86%) and mean coefficient of variation = 0.138 (range = 0.001-0.410). By pill count, 35% of individuals exhibited greater than 110% compliance on at least 1 visit. We conclude that (a) pill count variability is large, even among highly selected subjects, (b) traditional reports of overall pill counts are suboptimal, and (c) pill counts may unreliably measure medication-taking behavior because "supranormal" compliance by this method is improbable but common.
为评估药丸计数作为药物试验依从性测量方法的效果,我们追踪了121名非卧床高血压患者,这些患者在不到或等于12个月的时间里被选为依从性良好。药物治疗方案包括匹那地尔或肼屈嗪单药治疗,或与普萘洛尔和/或氢氯噻嗪联合使用。在20次复诊时每次都获取两种主要药物的药丸计数。该人群的特征为慢性单纯性高血压和社会人口统计学多样性;平均年龄为53岁。尽管平均每周药丸计数良好(总体平均依从率[±标准差]=96.0±13.2%),但我们观察到每周药丸计数评估中存在较大的个体间和个体内差异:个体的平均标准差=13.7%(范围=0%-86%),平均变异系数=0.138(范围=0.001-0.410)。通过药丸计数,35%的个体在至少一次复诊时表现出大于110%的依从性。我们得出结论:(a) 即使在经过高度挑选的受试者中,药丸计数的变异性也很大;(b) 传统的总体药丸计数报告并不理想;(c) 药丸计数可能无法可靠地测量服药行为,因为通过这种方法出现“超常”依从性不太可能但却很常见。