• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

团队中的探索性学习与开发性学习:剖析其前因与后果

Explorative and Exploitative Learning in Teams: Unpacking the Antecedents and Consequences.

作者信息

Zhao Kai, Zong Boqiang, Zhang Lihua

机构信息

Department of Human Resource Management, School of Labor and Human Resources, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 14;11:2041. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02041. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02041
PMID:32922342
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7456934/
Abstract

Many organizations adopt team-based structures to better survive in the highly competitive environment. To achieve this goal, teams not only need to develop new ideas to adapt to the changing situations, but also follow standardized procedures to complete tasks effectively, suggesting the importance of ambidextrous capacity on addressing the paradoxical demands. However, we have little knowledge about both of how to respectively facilitate team ambidextrous learning (i.e., team explorative and exploitative learning) and how team the two learning activities contributes to team effectiveness. Using the multi-time and multi-source data gathered from 140 teams in 6 Chinese companies, we found that team leader's power sharing and management control behaviors (i.e., ambidextrous leader behaviors) specifically enhanced team explorative and exploitative learning. In addition, our results showed that team explorative and exploitative learning drove overall team performance via the mechanisms of team creativity and task completion respectively. The theoretical and practical implications, limitations, and future research directions are discussed as well.

摘要

许多组织采用基于团队的结构,以便在高度竞争的环境中更好地生存。为实现这一目标,团队不仅需要开发新想法以适应不断变化的形势,还需要遵循标准化程序以有效完成任务,这表明了具备兼顾两种能力对于应对矛盾需求的重要性。然而,我们对于如何分别促进团队的兼顾两种能力的学习(即团队探索性学习和利用性学习)以及这两种学习活动如何对团队效能产生贡献都知之甚少。通过收集来自6家中国公司140个团队的多时段、多来源数据,我们发现团队领导者的权力分享和管理控制行为(即兼顾两种能力的领导行为)能够特别地增强团队探索性学习和利用性学习。此外,我们的研究结果表明,团队探索性学习和利用性学习分别通过团队创造力和任务完成机制推动了整体团队绩效。我们还讨论了研究的理论和实践意义、局限性以及未来的研究方向。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c11/7456934/87e753662b98/fpsyg-11-02041-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c11/7456934/26faa9e57645/fpsyg-11-02041-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c11/7456934/87e753662b98/fpsyg-11-02041-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c11/7456934/26faa9e57645/fpsyg-11-02041-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c11/7456934/87e753662b98/fpsyg-11-02041-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Explorative and Exploitative Learning in Teams: Unpacking the Antecedents and Consequences.团队中的探索性学习与开发性学习:剖析其前因与后果
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 14;11:2041. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02041. eCollection 2020.
2
The role of ambidextrous leadership and employee ambidexterity in enhancing service quality of care and creativity - a study of health professionals.双元领导和员工双元性在提高医护服务质量和创造力中的作用——以卫生专业人员为例。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Nov 14;23(1):1252. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10275-3.
3
Rejuvenating The Concept Of Work Alienation Through Job Demands-Resources Model And Examining Its Relationship With Emotional Exhaustion And Explorative And Exploitative Learning.通过工作要求-资源模型重振工作异化概念并考察其与情绪耗竭以及探索性学习和利用性学习的关系。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2019 Oct 7;12:931-941. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S204193. eCollection 2019.
4
Leader humility and team creativity: The role of team information sharing, psychological safety, and power distance.领导者谦逊与团队创造力:团队信息共享、心理安全感和权力距离的作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2018 Mar;103(3):313-323. doi: 10.1037/apl0000277. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
5
The influence of supervisor creative feedback environment on team creativity: The role of the ambidextrous learning and creative cognitive style.主管创造性反馈环境对团队创造力的影响:兼具适应性与创新性学习及创造性认知风格的作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 28;13:1007947. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1007947. eCollection 2022.
6
The importance of the nurse leader's proactivity and intellectual stimulation in the nursing team workload-learning relationship: A cross-sectional study.护士领导者的主动性和智力激发对护理团队工作量-学习关系的重要性:一项横断面研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Nov;75(11):2647-2658. doi: 10.1111/jan.14047. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
7
The impact of team empowerment on proactivity: the moderating roles of leader's emotional intelligence and proactive personality.团队授权对主动性的影响:领导情绪智力和主动性人格的调节作用。
J Health Organ Manag. 2012;26(4-5):560-77. doi: 10.1108/14777261211256918.
8
Team Leader Structuring for Team Effectiveness and Team Learning in Command-and-Control Teams.指挥控制团队中为实现团队效能和团队学习而进行的团队领导架构设计。
Small Group Res. 2017 Apr;48(2):215-248. doi: 10.1177/1046496417689897. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
9
How improvisation drives lean search: The moderating role of entrepreneurial team heterogeneity and environmental uncertainty.即兴创作如何推动精益搜索:创业团队异质性和环境不确定性的调节作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 29;13:940273. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.940273. eCollection 2022.
10
How Does Leader Humility Influence Team Creativity? The Roles of Team Behavioral Integration and Leader Performance.领导者谦逊如何影响团队创造力?团队行为整合与领导者绩效的作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 6;13:818865. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.818865. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Does paradoxical leadership influence employees' proactive work behavior? A study based on employees in Chinese state-owned enterprises.悖论式领导会影响员工的积极工作行为吗?一项基于中国国有企业员工的研究。
Front Psychol. 2023 Dec 18;14:1269906. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1269906. eCollection 2023.
2
The Curvilinear Relationships Between Relational Embeddedness and Dynamic Capabilities: The Mediating Effect of Ambidextrous Learning.关系嵌入性与动态能力之间的曲线关系:双元学习的中介作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 7;13:830377. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.830377. eCollection 2022.
3
Paradoxical Leadership and Employee Task Performance: A Sense-Making Perspective.

本文引用的文献

1
A century of work teams in the Journal of Applied Psychology.《应用心理学杂志》中的一个世纪的工作团队。
J Appl Psychol. 2017 Mar;102(3):452-467. doi: 10.1037/apl0000128. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
2
Modeling reciprocal team cohesion-performance relationships, as impacted by shared leadership and members' competence.建立团队相互协作关系的模型,研究共同领导和成员能力对团队协作关系和绩效的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2015 May;100(3):713-34. doi: 10.1037/a0038898. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
3
Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it.
矛盾型领导与员工任务绩效:一种意义建构视角
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 16;12:753116. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.753116. eCollection 2021.
社会科学研究中方法偏差的来源及控制方法建议。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2012;63:539-69. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
4
The ambidextrous CEO.左右开弓的首席执行官。
Harv Bus Rev. 2011 Jun;89(6):74-80, 136.
5
Team-level predictors of innovation at work: a comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research.工作中创新的团队层面预测因素:跨越三十年研究的综合元分析
J Appl Psychol. 2009 Sep;94(5):1128-45. doi: 10.1037/a0015978.
6
When is educational specialization heterogeneity related to creativity in research and development teams? Transformational leadership as a moderator.教育专业化异质性何时与研发团队的创造力相关?变革型领导作为调节变量。
J Appl Psychol. 2007 Nov;92(6):1709-21. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1709.
7
Transforming service employees and climate: a multilevel, multisource examination of transformational leadership in building long-term service relationships.转变服务员工与服务氛围:对构建长期服务关系中变革型领导的多层次、多源考察。
J Appl Psychol. 2007 Jul;92(4):1006-19. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1006.