Suppr超能文献

使用耳科手术规划软件比较CT和MR图像中的耳蜗管长度。

Comparing Cochlear Duct Lengths Between CT and MR Images Using an Otological Surgical Planning Software.

作者信息

George-Jones Nicholas A, Tolisano Anthony M, Kutz J Walter, Isaacson Brandon, Hunter Jacob B

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland.

出版信息

Otol Neurotol. 2020 Oct;41(9):e1118-e1121. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002777.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We sought to examine the intra- and interobserver variability in measuring the cochlear duct length (CDL) from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images versus computed tomography (CT) images using an otological surgical planning software that uses measurements of the basal turn diameter and cochlear width to estimate the CDL.

PATIENTS

Twenty-one adult cochlear implant patients with preoperative MRI and CT images.

INTERVENTION

Three fellowship-trained neurotologists served as the raters in the study. One rater measured the CDL using preoperative CT scans to serve as the benchmark. Two of the raters measured the CDL on preoperative MRI scans. One rater also remeasured the scans using MRI images after a period of 1 week to assess intraobserver variability.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Intraclass correlational coefficients were calculated to assess for intra- and interobserver agreement.

RESULTS

The mean CDL measured from the CT scans was 32.7 ± 2.0 mm (range 29.4 - 37.6 mm). The mean difference between the raters when measuring the CDL using MRI scans was -0.15 ± 2.1 mm (range -3.2 to 4.3 mm). The intraclass correlational coefficients for inter-rater reliability of CDL determination using MRI scans was judged as fair to excellent (0.68; 95% CI 0.41-0.84). The intrarater reliability of CDL determination using MRI scans was judged at fair to excellent (0.73; 95% CI 0.491-0.866).

CONCLUSION

We demonstrate that a validated otological surgical planning software for estimating the CDL preoperatively had comparable performance using MRI scans versus the gold-standard CT scans.

摘要

目的

我们试图使用一种耳科手术规划软件,通过测量蜗底直径和耳蜗宽度来估计耳蜗管长度(CDL),研究在磁共振成像(MRI)图像与计算机断层扫描(CT)图像上测量CDL时观察者内和观察者间的变异性。

患者

21名成年人工耳蜗植入患者,术前有MRI和CT图像。

干预措施

三名接受过专科培训的神经耳科医生作为研究中的评估者。一名评估者使用术前CT扫描测量CDL作为基准。两名评估者在术前MRI扫描上测量CDL。一名评估者还在1周后使用MRI图像重新测量扫描结果,以评估观察者内变异性。

主要观察指标

计算组内相关系数以评估观察者内和观察者间的一致性。

结果

从CT扫描测量的平均CDL为32.7±2.0mm(范围29.4 - 37.6mm)。使用MRI扫描测量CDL时评估者之间的平均差异为-0.15±2.1mm(范围-3.2至4.3mm)。使用MRI扫描确定CDL的评估者间可靠性的组内相关系数被判定为中等至优秀(0.68;95%CI 0.41 - 0.84)。使用MRI扫描确定CDL的评估者内可靠性被判定为中等至优秀(0.73;95%CI 0.491 - 0.866)。

结论

我们证明,一种经过验证的用于术前估计CDL的耳科手术规划软件,在使用MRI扫描与金标准CT扫描时具有相当的性能。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验