Center for Modeling, Simulation and Imaging in Medicine (CeMSIM), Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, USA.
Center for Modeling, Simulation and Imaging in Medicine (CeMSIM), Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, USA.
Burns. 2021 Jun;47(4):812-820. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2020.08.006. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
Accurate classification of burn severities is of vital importance for proper burn treatments. A recent article reported that using the combination of Raman spectroscopy and optical coherence tomography (OCT) classifies different degrees of burns with an overall accuracy of 85% [1]. In this study, we demonstrate the feasibility of using Raman spectroscopy alone to classify burn severities on ex vivo porcine skin tissues. To create different levels of burns, four burn conditions were designed: (i) 200°F for 10s, (ii) 200°F for 30s, (iii) 450°F for 10s and (iv) 450°F for 30s. Raman spectra from 500-2000cm were collected from samples of the four burn conditions as well as the unburnt condition. Classifications were performed using kernel support vector machine (KSVM) with features extracted from the spectra by principal component analysis (PCA), and partial least-square (PLS). Both techniques yielded an average accuracy of approximately 92%, which was independently evaluated by leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV). By comparison, PCA+KSVM provides higher accuracy in classifying severe burns, while PLS performs better in classifying mild burns. Variable importance in the projection (VIP) scores from the PLS models reveal that proteins and lipids, amide III, and amino acids are important indicators in separating unburnt or mild burns (200°F), while amide I has a more pronounced impact in separating severe burns (450°F).
准确的烧伤严重程度分类对于适当的烧伤治疗至关重要。最近的一篇文章报道,使用拉曼光谱和光相干断层扫描(OCT)的组合可以将不同程度的烧伤分类,总体准确率为 85%[1]。在本研究中,我们证明了仅使用拉曼光谱对离体猪皮组织进行烧伤严重程度分类的可行性。为了制造不同程度的烧伤,设计了四种烧伤条件:(i)200°F 10 秒,(ii)200°F 30 秒,(iii)450°F 10 秒和(iv)450°F 30 秒。从四种烧伤条件以及未烧伤条件的样本中收集了 500-2000cm 的拉曼光谱。使用核支持向量机(KSVM)对分类进行了分析,从光谱中提取特征,并通过主成分分析(PCA)和偏最小二乘法(PLS)进行分析。两种技术的平均准确率约为 92%,通过留一法交叉验证(LOOCV)进行独立评估。相比之下,PCA+KSVM 在严重烧伤的分类中提供了更高的准确性,而 PLS 在轻度烧伤的分类中表现更好。PLS 模型的投影变量重要性(VIP)评分显示,蛋白质和脂质、酰胺 III 和氨基酸是区分未烧伤或轻度烧伤(200°F)的重要指标,而酰胺 I 在区分严重烧伤(450°F)方面具有更显著的影响。