Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 10900 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
University Hospitals Connor Integrative Health Network, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Support Care Cancer. 2021 May;29(5):2465-2474. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05749-7. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
To explore (1) perceptions of tobacco cessation for patients, (2) perceived role in addressing patients' tobacco use, (3) facilitators and barriers to providing cessation services, and (4) perceptions and use of tobacco cessation resources among oncology providers.
Interviews were conducted with 24 oncology providers at a National Cancer Institute-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center. Qualitative themes were analyzed using content analysis.
Participants (1) perceived smoking cessation's priority as low and/or dependent upon clinical factors, (2) described a passive role in addressing tobacco cessation, (3) described loss-framed versus gain-framed messaging when delivering cessation advice, (4) reported moderate self-efficacy in discussing and low self-efficacy in implementing cessation strategies, (5) described multi-level facilitators and barriers to patients' tobacco cessation, and (6) expressed high value for the cancer center's tobacco cessation service.
Oncology providers in this study perceived patients' tobacco cessation as a low priority relative to providing direct cancer treatment and addressing acute complications. These findings indicate opportunities for training to increase delivery of evidence-based cessation advice and facilitate patients' engagement in cessation services. Provider trainings on embracing an active role in tobacco cessation, addressing multi-level barriers to patients' tobacco cessation, and using gain-framed messaging should be implemented. This has the potential to improve cancer patients' treatment outcomes.
探讨(1)患者对戒烟的看法,(2)在解决患者吸烟问题方面的感知作用,(3)提供戒烟服务的促进因素和障碍,以及(4)肿瘤学提供者对戒烟资源的看法和使用。
在国家癌症研究所指定的综合癌症中心对 24 名肿瘤学提供者进行了访谈。使用内容分析法对定性主题进行分析。
参与者(1)认为戒烟的优先级低,并且/或者取决于临床因素,(2)描述了在解决烟草使用问题上的被动作用,(3)描述了在提供戒烟建议时使用损失框架和收益框架信息传递,(4)报告了在讨论和实施戒烟策略方面中等的自我效能感,(5)描述了患者戒烟的多层次促进因素和障碍,以及(6)对癌症中心的戒烟服务表示高度重视。
本研究中的肿瘤学提供者认为,与提供直接癌症治疗和解决急性并发症相比,患者的烟草戒断优先级较低。这些发现表明有机会进行培训,以增加提供基于证据的戒烟建议并促进患者参与戒烟服务。应实施针对接受积极戒烟角色、解决患者戒烟的多层次障碍以及使用收益框架信息传递的提供者培训。这有可能改善癌症患者的治疗效果。