Centre of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance - Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Cardiology Division, Heart & Vessels Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Eur Radiol. 2021 Mar;31(3):1245-1256. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07254-1. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
T2*-weighted (T2w) is deemed as a reference standard for post-infarction intramyocardial haemorrhage (IMH). However, high proportion of T2 images is affected by off-resonance artefacts hampering image interpretation. Diagnostic accuracy and precision of alternative techniques for IMH diagnosis and quantification have been seldomly investigated.
Between April 2016 and May 2017, 50 ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients (66% male, 57 ± 17 years) and 15 healthy controls (60% male, 58 ± 13) were consecutively enrolled. Subjects underwent head-to-head comparison of single mid-infarct slice acquired on black-blood T2-weighted short-TI-inversion recovery (T2w-STIR), bright-blood T2prep-steady-state-free precession (T2prep-SSFP), and T2/T1 maps for IMH diagnosis and quantification against T2w. All images were graded for quality (grade 1: very poor; grade 4: excellent) and diagnostic confidence (Likert scale, 1: very unsure and 5: highly confident). Reduced relaxation time/hypointense region (hypocore) embedded in infarct-related oedema on T2 map, T1 map, and T2w-STIR had the best overall diagnostic accuracy (per-subject: 91%, 86%, and 86%, respectively; per segment: 95%, 93%, and 93%, respectively). By mixed-effects analysis, image quality, and diagnostic confidence were higher for T2 map and T1 maps than T2w (p < 0.05 for both scores). For IMH quantification, hypocore on T2 map and T1 map strongly correlated (Spearman's r > 0.7, p < 0.001 for both) with IMH extent on T2w and presented an overall excellent agreement on Bland-Altman analysis. By linear mixed model analysis, absolute hypocore size did not differ among T1-, T2 map, and T2w. T2/T1 maps had the best intra- and inter-observer reproducibility among CMR techniques.
Hypocore on T2/T1 map is the best alternative technique to T2*w for diagnosing and quantifying IMH in post-STEMI patients.
• Mapping techniques are the best alternatives for diagnosing post-infarction intramyocardial haemorrhage. • Mapping techniques are valuable tools for imaging intramyocardial haemorrhage.
T2*-加权(T2w)被认为是心肌梗死后心肌内出血(IMH)的参考标准。然而,大量 T2图像受到离共振伪影的影响,这会干扰图像解读。替代技术对 IMH 诊断和定量的诊断准确性和精确性很少被研究。
2016 年 4 月至 2017 年 5 月,连续纳入 50 例 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者(66%为男性,57±17 岁)和 15 例健康对照者(60%为男性,58±13 岁)。受试者进行了单张梗死中部切片的头对头比较,这些切片分别来自黑血 T2 加权短 TI 反转恢复(T2w-STIR)、亮血 T2prep-稳态自由进动(T2prep-SSFP)和 T2/T1 图,用于 IMH 诊断和定量,以与 T2w 进行比较。所有图像均按质量(1 级:很差;4 级:很好)和诊断信心(Likert 量表,1:非常不确定,5:非常确定)进行分级。T2 图、T1 图和 T2w-STIR 上嵌入梗死相关水肿中的弛豫时间缩短/低信号区(低信号核)对 IMH 的整体诊断准确性最好(每例:91%、86%和 86%;每段:95%、93%和 93%)。混合效应分析表明,T2 图和 T1 图的图像质量和诊断信心均高于 T2w(两种评分均 p<0.05)。对于 IMH 定量,T2 图和 T1 图上的低信号核与 T2w 上的 IMH 范围强烈相关(Spearman r>0.7,p<0.001),并且在 Bland-Altman 分析中具有很好的一致性。通过线性混合模型分析,T1、T2 图和 T2w 之间的绝对低信号核大小无差异。T2/T1 图在 CMR 技术中具有最佳的观察者内和观察者间可重复性。
T2/T1 图上的低信号核是 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者诊断和定量 IMH 的最佳替代 T2*w 技术。
• 映射技术是诊断心肌梗死后心肌内出血的最佳替代技术。• 映射技术是用于成像心肌内出血的有价值的工具。