Suppr超能文献

比较多种心血管磁共振技术对头检测和量化 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者心肌内出血的效果。

Head-to-head comparison of multiple cardiovascular magnetic resonance techniques for the detection and quantification of intramyocardial haemorrhage in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

机构信息

Centre of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance - Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Cardiology Division, Heart & Vessels Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2021 Mar;31(3):1245-1256. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07254-1. Epub 2020 Sep 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

T2*-weighted (T2w) is deemed as a reference standard for post-infarction intramyocardial haemorrhage (IMH). However, high proportion of T2 images is affected by off-resonance artefacts hampering image interpretation. Diagnostic accuracy and precision of alternative techniques for IMH diagnosis and quantification have been seldomly investigated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between April 2016 and May 2017, 50 ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients (66% male, 57 ± 17 years) and 15 healthy controls (60% male, 58 ± 13) were consecutively enrolled. Subjects underwent head-to-head comparison of single mid-infarct slice acquired on black-blood T2-weighted short-TI-inversion recovery (T2w-STIR), bright-blood T2prep-steady-state-free precession (T2prep-SSFP), and T2/T1 maps for IMH diagnosis and quantification against T2w. All images were graded for quality (grade 1: very poor; grade 4: excellent) and diagnostic confidence (Likert scale, 1: very unsure and 5: highly confident). Reduced relaxation time/hypointense region (hypocore) embedded in infarct-related oedema on T2 map, T1 map, and T2w-STIR had the best overall diagnostic accuracy (per-subject: 91%, 86%, and 86%, respectively; per segment: 95%, 93%, and 93%, respectively). By mixed-effects analysis, image quality, and diagnostic confidence were higher for T2 map and T1 maps than T2w (p < 0.05 for both scores). For IMH quantification, hypocore on T2 map and T1 map strongly correlated (Spearman's r > 0.7, p < 0.001 for both) with IMH extent on T2w and presented an overall excellent agreement on Bland-Altman analysis. By linear mixed model analysis, absolute hypocore size did not differ among T1-, T2 map, and T2w. T2/T1 maps had the best intra- and inter-observer reproducibility among CMR techniques.

CONCLUSION

Hypocore on T2/T1 map is the best alternative technique to T2*w for diagnosing and quantifying IMH in post-STEMI patients.

KEY POINT

• Mapping techniques are the best alternatives for diagnosing post-infarction intramyocardial haemorrhage. • Mapping techniques are valuable tools for imaging intramyocardial haemorrhage.

摘要

目的

T2*-加权(T2w)被认为是心肌梗死后心肌内出血(IMH)的参考标准。然而,大量 T2图像受到离共振伪影的影响,这会干扰图像解读。替代技术对 IMH 诊断和定量的诊断准确性和精确性很少被研究。

方法和结果

2016 年 4 月至 2017 年 5 月,连续纳入 50 例 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者(66%为男性,57±17 岁)和 15 例健康对照者(60%为男性,58±13 岁)。受试者进行了单张梗死中部切片的头对头比较,这些切片分别来自黑血 T2 加权短 TI 反转恢复(T2w-STIR)、亮血 T2prep-稳态自由进动(T2prep-SSFP)和 T2/T1 图,用于 IMH 诊断和定量,以与 T2w 进行比较。所有图像均按质量(1 级:很差;4 级:很好)和诊断信心(Likert 量表,1:非常不确定,5:非常确定)进行分级。T2 图、T1 图和 T2w-STIR 上嵌入梗死相关水肿中的弛豫时间缩短/低信号区(低信号核)对 IMH 的整体诊断准确性最好(每例:91%、86%和 86%;每段:95%、93%和 93%)。混合效应分析表明,T2 图和 T1 图的图像质量和诊断信心均高于 T2w(两种评分均 p<0.05)。对于 IMH 定量,T2 图和 T1 图上的低信号核与 T2w 上的 IMH 范围强烈相关(Spearman r>0.7,p<0.001),并且在 Bland-Altman 分析中具有很好的一致性。通过线性混合模型分析,T1、T2 图和 T2w 之间的绝对低信号核大小无差异。T2/T1 图在 CMR 技术中具有最佳的观察者内和观察者间可重复性。

结论

T2/T1 图上的低信号核是 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者诊断和定量 IMH 的最佳替代 T2*w 技术。

重点

• 映射技术是诊断心肌梗死后心肌内出血的最佳替代技术。• 映射技术是用于成像心肌内出血的有价值的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a819/7880961/062bb753bd21/330_2020_7254_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验