Suppr超能文献

在医院实验室的参比下,儿科门诊实验室采用固相酶免疫测定法检测A组链球菌的性能。

Performance of a solid phase enzyme immunoassay for detection of group A streptococci in a pediatric office laboratory as refereed by a hospital laboratory.

作者信息

Yuckienuz S A, Thorne G M, Macone A B, Goldmann D A, St Pierre J, Marcus E P

机构信息

Newton-Wellesley Pediatrics, P.C., Newton Lower Falls, MA 02162.

出版信息

Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1988 Jun;7(6):393-8. doi: 10.1097/00006454-198806000-00005.

Abstract

We evaluated the performance of a new rapid solid phase enzyme immunoassay, SUDS Group A Strep (MUREX Corp., Norcross, GA) for the detection of Group A beta-hemolytic streptococci in a pediatric office practice. Duplicate throat swabs were obtained from 341 children with pharyngitis. One swab was used in the SUDS test and the other was cultured in the office laboratory. Office SUDS and culture (sheep blood agar plate, aerobic 24-hour incubation) were compared with culture using reference techniques (sheep blood agar plate, anaerobic 48-hour incubation) in a hospital laboratory. Compared with hospital laboratory culture, the sensitivity of office SUDS (73.8%) was superior to that of office culture (66.6%) at P = 0.05. Specificities were 93.1 and 98.6%, respectively; positive predictive values were 86.1 and 96.6%; and negative predictive values were 85.9 and 83.5%. The sensitivity and specificity of SUDS compared with office culture were 88.5 and 87.8%, respectively, but would have been 93 and 94% had hemolyzed media not been used on several occasions in the office culture procedure. We conclude that SUDS Group A Strep was significantly more sensitive than throat cultures as performed in a typical pediatric practice although the performance of office cultures could have been improved by standard quality control techniques.

摘要

我们评估了一种新型快速固相酶免疫测定法——SUDS A组链球菌检测法(MUREX公司,佐治亚州诺克罗斯)在儿科门诊实践中检测A组β溶血性链球菌的性能。从341名咽炎患儿中获取双份咽拭子。一份咽拭子用于SUDS检测,另一份在门诊实验室进行培养。将门诊的SUDS检测和培养(羊血琼脂平板,需氧培养24小时)与医院实验室采用参考技术(羊血琼脂平板,厌氧培养48小时)进行的培养相比较。与医院实验室培养相比,门诊SUDS检测的敏感性(73.8%)在P = 0.05时优于门诊培养(66.6%)。特异性分别为93.1%和98.6%;阳性预测值分别为86.1%和96.6%;阴性预测值分别为85.9%和83.5%。与门诊培养相比,SUDS检测的敏感性和特异性分别为88.5%和87.8%,但如果门诊培养过程中没有几次使用溶血培养基,敏感性和特异性本可分别达到93%和94%。我们得出结论,在典型的儿科实践中,SUDS A组链球菌检测法比咽拭子培养法明显更敏感,尽管门诊培养的性能可通过标准质量控制技术得到改善。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验