• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

艰难梭菌感染诊断检测方法、聚合酶链反应核糖型与临床结局之间关联的变化:一家机构的经验。

Changes in the Association Between Diagnostic Testing Method, Polymerase Chain Reaction Ribotype, and Clinical Outcomes From Clostridioides difficile Infection: One Institution's Experience.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 2;73(9):e2883-e2889. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1395.

DOI:10.1093/cid/ciaa1395
PMID:32930705
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8563190/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), the relationship between clinical, microbial, and temporal/epidemiological trends, disease severity and adverse outcomes is incompletely understood. In a follow-up to our study from 2010-2013, we evaluate stool toxin levels and C. difficile polymerase chain reaction (PCR) ribotypes. We hypothesized that elevated stool toxins and infection with ribotype 027 associate with adverse outcomes.

METHODS

In 565 subjects at the University of Michigan with CDI diagnosed by positive testing for toxins A/B by enzyme immunoassay (EIA) or PCR for the tcdB gene, we quantified stool toxin levels via a modified cell cytotoxicity assay (CCA), isolated C. difficile by anaerobic culture, and performed PCR ribotyping. Severe CDI was defined by Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) criteria, and primary outcomes were all-cause 30-day mortality and a composite of colectomy, intensive care unit admission, and/or death attributable to CDI within 30 days. Analyses included bivariable tests and logistic regression.

RESULTS

199 samples were diagnosed by EIA; 447 were diagnosed by PCR. Toxin positivity associated with IDSA severity but not primary outcomes. In 2016, compared with 2010-2013, ribotype 106 newly emerged, accounting for 10.6% of strains, ribotype 027 fell from 16.5% to 9.3%, and ribotype 014-027 remained stable at 18.9%. Ribotype 014-020 associated with IDSA severity and 30-day mortality (P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Toxin positivity by EIA and CCA associated with IDSA severity but not with subsequent adverse outcomes. The molecular epidemiology of C. difficile has shifted, which may have implications for the optimal diagnostic strategy for and clinical severity of CDI.

摘要

背景

在艰难梭菌感染(CDI)中,临床、微生物和时间/流行病学趋势、疾病严重程度和不良结局之间的关系尚未完全阐明。在我们 2010-2013 年的研究的后续研究中,我们评估了粪便毒素水平和艰难梭菌聚合酶链反应(PCR)核糖体分型。我们假设粪便毒素升高和感染 027 型核糖体与不良结局相关。

方法

在密歇根大学的 565 名 CDI 患者中,通过酶联免疫吸附试验(EIA)或 PCR 检测 tcdB 基因阳性检测毒素 A/B 诊断为 CDI,我们通过改良细胞细胞毒性测定法(CCA)定量粪便毒素水平,通过厌氧培养分离艰难梭菌,并进行 PCR 核糖体分型。严重 CDI 由感染病学会(IDSA)标准定义,主要结局是 30 天内全因死亡率和归因于 CDI 的 30 天内结肠切除术、重症监护病房入院和/或死亡的复合指标。分析包括双变量检验和逻辑回归。

结果

199 个样本通过 EIA 诊断;447 个样本通过 PCR 诊断。毒素阳性与 IDSA 严重程度相关,但与主要结局无关。2016 年与 2010-2013 年相比,106 型核糖体新出现,占菌株的 10.6%,027 型核糖体从 16.5%降至 9.3%,014-027 型核糖体保持稳定在 18.9%。014-020 型核糖体与 IDSA 严重程度和 30 天死亡率相关(P=0.001)。

结论

EIA 和 CCA 的毒素阳性与 IDSA 严重程度相关,但与随后的不良结局无关。艰难梭菌的分子流行病学已经发生变化,这可能对 CDI 的最佳诊断策略和临床严重程度产生影响。

相似文献

1
Changes in the Association Between Diagnostic Testing Method, Polymerase Chain Reaction Ribotype, and Clinical Outcomes From Clostridioides difficile Infection: One Institution's Experience.艰难梭菌感染诊断检测方法、聚合酶链反应核糖型与临床结局之间关联的变化:一家机构的经验。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 2;73(9):e2883-e2889. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1395.
2
Clostridium difficile ribotype 027: relationship to age, detectability of toxins A or B in stool with rapid testing, severe infection, and mortality.艰难梭菌核糖体分型027:与年龄的关系、粪便中毒素A或B快速检测的可检测性、严重感染及死亡率
Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Jul 15;61(2):233-41. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ254. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
3
Predominance of Clostridioides difficile PCR ribotype 181 in northern Greece, 2016-2019.2016-2019 年希腊北部艰难梭菌 PCR 核糖型 181 的优势。
Anaerobe. 2022 Aug;76:102601. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2022.102601. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
4
Impact of the introduction of nucleic acid amplification testing on Clostridioides difficile detection and ribotype distribution in Wales.核酸扩增检测的引入对威尔士艰难梭菌检测和核糖体型分布的影响。
Anaerobe. 2021 Feb;67:102313. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2020.102313. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
5
Predictors of Clostridioides difficile Infection-Related Complications and Treatment Patterns among Nucleic Acid Amplification Test-Positive/Toxin Enzyme Immunoassay-Negative Patients.核酸扩增试验阳性/毒素酶免疫测定阴性患者中艰难梭菌感染相关并发症及治疗模式的预测因素。
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Feb 24;58(3). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01764-19.
6
Clinical outcomes and treatment necessity in patients with toxin-negative Clostridioides difficile stool samples.无毒素艰难梭菌粪便样本患者的临床结局和治疗必要性。
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2024 Apr 25;23(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12941-024-00696-1.
7
Epidemiologic trends in Clostridioides difficile isolate ribotypes in United States from 2011 to 2016.2011 年至 2016 年美国艰难梭菌分离株核糖体分型的流行病学趋势。
Anaerobe. 2020 Jun;63:102185. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2020.102185. Epub 2020 May 6.
8
Emergence of Clostridium difficile ribotype 027 in Korea.韩国艰难梭菌核糖型027的出现。
Korean J Lab Med. 2011 Jul;31(3):191-6. doi: 10.3343/kjlm.2011.31.3.191. Epub 2011 Jun 28.
9
Indeterminate tcdB using a Clostridium difficile PCR assay: a retrospective cohort study.使用艰难梭菌 PCR 检测法检测不确定 tcdB:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2013 Jul 16;13:324. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-324.
10
Clostridioides difficile PCR Tcdb Cycle Threshold predicts toxin EIA positivity but not severity of infection.艰难梭菌 PCR Tcdb 循环阈值可预测毒素 EIA 阳性,但不能预测感染的严重程度。
Anaerobe. 2023 Aug;82:102755. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2023.102755. Epub 2023 Jul 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Prospective evaluation of data-driven models to predict daily risk of infection at 2 large academic health centers.前瞻性评估数据驱动模型,以预测 2 家大型学术医疗中心的每日感染风险。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2023 Jul;44(7):1163-1166. doi: 10.1017/ice.2022.218. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
2
Defining the black box: a narrative review of factors associated with adverse outcomes from severe infection.定义黑匣子:对与严重感染不良结局相关因素的叙述性综述
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2021 Oct 8;14:17562848211048127. doi: 10.1177/17562848211048127. eCollection 2021.
3
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are not associated with increased risk of Clostridioides difficile infection: A propensity-score-matched case-control study.非甾体抗炎药与艰难梭菌感染风险增加无关:一项倾向评分匹配的病例对照研究。
Anaerobe. 2021 Dec;72:102444. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2021.102444. Epub 2021 Sep 22.

本文引用的文献

1
A Laboratory Medicine Best Practices Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests (NAATs) and Algorithms Including NAATs for the Diagnosis of () in Adults.一项关于核酸扩增检测(NAATs)和包括 NAATs 在内的算法在诊断成人()中的实验室医学最佳实践系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2019 May 29;32(3). doi: 10.1128/CMR.00032-18. Print 2019 Jun 19.
2
Toxin Enzyme Immunoassays Detect Clostridioides difficile Infection With Greater Severity and Higher Recurrence Rates.毒素酶免疫测定法检测艰难梭菌感染的严重程度更高,复发率更高。
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Oct 30;69(10):1667-1674. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz009.
3
Clinical Practice Guidelines for Clostridium difficile Infection in Adults and Children: 2017 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA).临床实践指南:成人和儿童艰难梭菌感染:美国传染病学会(IDSA)和美国医疗保健流行病学学会(SHEA) 2017 年更新。
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Mar 19;66(7):e1-e48. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix1085.
4
Risk of Subsequent Sepsis Within 90 Days After a Hospital Stay by Type of Antibiotic Exposure.住院后 90 天内使用不同类型抗生素与后续发生脓毒症的风险。
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Mar 19;66(7):1004-1012. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix947.
5
Point-Counterpoint: What Is the Optimal Approach for Detection of Clostridium difficile Infection?针锋相对:艰难梭菌感染检测的最佳方法是什么?
J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Mar;55(3):670-680. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02463-16. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
6
Diagnosis and outcome of Clostridium difficile infection by toxin enzyme immunoassay and polymerase chain reaction in an island population.通过毒素酶免疫测定和聚合酶链反应对岛屿人群艰难梭菌感染的诊断及结果
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Feb;32(2):415-419. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13504.
7
Diagnosing Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea using enzyme immunoassay: the clinical significance of toxin negativity in glutamate dehydrogenase-positive patients.使用酶免疫测定法诊断艰难梭菌相关性腹泻:谷氨酸脱氢酶阳性患者毒素阴性的临床意义
Infect Drug Resist. 2016 May 27;9:93-9. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S105429. eCollection 2016.
8
Overdiagnosis of Clostridium difficile Infection in the Molecular Test Era.分子检测时代艰难梭菌感染的过度诊断
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Nov;175(11):1792-801. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.4114.
9
Mechanisms of hypervirulent Clostridium difficile ribotype 027 displacement of endemic strains: an epidemiological model.高毒力艰难梭菌核糖体分型027取代地方流行菌株的机制:一种流行病学模型
Sci Rep. 2015 Jul 28;5:12666. doi: 10.1038/srep12666.
10
Laboratory and Clinical features of EIA Toxin-positive and EIA Toxin-negative Community-acquired Clostridium difficile Infection.酶免疫分析毒素阳性和酶免疫分析毒素阴性社区获得性艰难梭菌感染的实验室及临床特征
Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2015 Spring;45(3):333-9.