Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience.
Can J Exp Psychol. 2021 Jun;75(2):197-203. doi: 10.1037/cep0000231. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
This research examined the interpretation of the pragmatic markers and when they followed familiar and unfamiliar proverbs (e.g., "Birds of a feather will flock together, literally"). Event-related brain potential methodology was used to measure costs associated with interpreting the markers during online comprehension, and an offline task provided additional insight into how sensible the markers were in the proverbial contexts. N400 potentials revealed that was less semantically congruent than with familiar and unfamiliar proverbial contexts, and differences in late positive potentials showed that resolving the interpretation of markers inconsistent with the salient meaning of the proverbs was more difficult following unfamiliar than familiar proverbs. Sensibility ratings showed that was less sensible than following both types of proverbs, and that both markers were more sensible following familiar proverbs. These results have implications for understanding how people interpret the pragmatic intent of these markers when they appear after the figurative statements they modify, and highlight the sensitivity of the markers to context. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
本研究考察了语用标记词 和 在理解熟悉和不熟悉的谚语(如“物以类聚”)时的解释。采用事件相关脑电位方法来测量在在线理解过程中解释这些标记所产生的成本,而离线任务则进一步深入了解这些标记在谚语语境中的合理性。N400 电位表明,与熟悉和不熟悉的谚语语境相比, 的语义一致性较差,而晚期正电位的差异表明,在不熟悉的谚语语境中,与谚语明显含义不一致的标记的解释更为困难。敏感性评分表明,在熟悉和不熟悉的谚语中, 的合理性均不及 ,而在熟悉的谚语中,两个标记都更合理。这些结果对于理解人们在这些标记出现在它们所修饰的比喻性陈述之后时如何解释这些标记的语用意图具有启示意义,并强调了标记对语境的敏感性。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2021 APA,保留所有权利)。