Palgi Yuval, Karatzias Thanos, Hyland Philip, Shevlin Mark, Ben-Ezra Menachem
Department of Gerontology, University of Haifa.
NHS Lothian Rivers Centre for Traumatic Stress.
Psychol Trauma. 2021 Feb;13(2):142-148. doi: 10.1037/tra0000966. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
The primary aim of the current study was to establish the cutoffs scores for the Subjective Traumatic Outlook (STO), a relatively new tool that examines the introspective worldview of those exposed to traumatic events. This tool was developed as a complementary scale to be used in conjunction with the observed-phenomenological measures of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) complex PTSD (CPTSD). The present study examines the predictive power of STO for distinguishing between PTSD and CPTSD in African countries. A national representative (based on age and gender) sample of 2,554 participants was drawn from 3 African countries (Nigeria, Kenya, and Ghana) who completed the International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) and the STO. We conducted a set of analyses examining that alignment of ITQ probable PTSD and CPTSD and different STO cutoff scores. Results suggest that the STO single-factor structure was stable across countries, had a strong association with PTSD and CPTSD levels, and had predictive utility in differentiating between PTSD and CPTSD. Moreover, we found that there are different cutoffs for the STO in the different countries. There is a strong but distinctive association between the introspective and the observed-phenomenological approaches of PTSD and CPTSD. Our findings call for more integrative approaches for the assessment of PTSD and CPTSD and suggest that there are cultural differences in STO. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
本研究的主要目的是确定主观创伤观(STO)的临界分数,STO是一种相对较新的工具,用于审视经历创伤事件者的内省世界观。该工具是作为一种补充量表开发的,与创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD)的观察现象学测量方法结合使用。本研究考察了STO在非洲国家区分PTSD和CPTSD的预测能力。从3个非洲国家(尼日利亚、肯尼亚和加纳)抽取了一个具有全国代表性(基于年龄和性别)的2554名参与者样本,他们完成了国际创伤问卷(ITQ)和STO。我们进行了一系列分析,考察ITQ可能的PTSD和CPTSD与不同STO临界分数的一致性。结果表明,STO单因素结构在各国具有稳定性,与PTSD和CPTSD水平有很强的关联,并且在区分PTSD和CPTSD方面具有预测效用。此外,我们发现不同国家的STO临界分数不同。PTSD和CPTSD的内省方法与观察现象学方法之间存在强烈但独特的关联。我们的研究结果呼吁采用更综合的方法来评估PTSD和CPTSD,并表明STO存在文化差异。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2021美国心理学会,保留所有权利)