• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤的主观认知能否区分国际疾病分类第11版中的创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂性PTSD?对三个非洲国家的跨文化比较。

Can subjective perceptions of trauma differentiate between ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD? A cross-cultural comparison of three African countries.

作者信息

Palgi Yuval, Karatzias Thanos, Hyland Philip, Shevlin Mark, Ben-Ezra Menachem

机构信息

Department of Gerontology, University of Haifa.

NHS Lothian Rivers Centre for Traumatic Stress.

出版信息

Psychol Trauma. 2021 Feb;13(2):142-148. doi: 10.1037/tra0000966. Epub 2020 Sep 17.

DOI:10.1037/tra0000966
PMID:32940522
Abstract

The primary aim of the current study was to establish the cutoffs scores for the Subjective Traumatic Outlook (STO), a relatively new tool that examines the introspective worldview of those exposed to traumatic events. This tool was developed as a complementary scale to be used in conjunction with the observed-phenomenological measures of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) complex PTSD (CPTSD). The present study examines the predictive power of STO for distinguishing between PTSD and CPTSD in African countries. A national representative (based on age and gender) sample of 2,554 participants was drawn from 3 African countries (Nigeria, Kenya, and Ghana) who completed the International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) and the STO. We conducted a set of analyses examining that alignment of ITQ probable PTSD and CPTSD and different STO cutoff scores. Results suggest that the STO single-factor structure was stable across countries, had a strong association with PTSD and CPTSD levels, and had predictive utility in differentiating between PTSD and CPTSD. Moreover, we found that there are different cutoffs for the STO in the different countries. There is a strong but distinctive association between the introspective and the observed-phenomenological approaches of PTSD and CPTSD. Our findings call for more integrative approaches for the assessment of PTSD and CPTSD and suggest that there are cultural differences in STO. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

本研究的主要目的是确定主观创伤观(STO)的临界分数,STO是一种相对较新的工具,用于审视经历创伤事件者的内省世界观。该工具是作为一种补充量表开发的,与创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD)的观察现象学测量方法结合使用。本研究考察了STO在非洲国家区分PTSD和CPTSD的预测能力。从3个非洲国家(尼日利亚、肯尼亚和加纳)抽取了一个具有全国代表性(基于年龄和性别)的2554名参与者样本,他们完成了国际创伤问卷(ITQ)和STO。我们进行了一系列分析,考察ITQ可能的PTSD和CPTSD与不同STO临界分数的一致性。结果表明,STO单因素结构在各国具有稳定性,与PTSD和CPTSD水平有很强的关联,并且在区分PTSD和CPTSD方面具有预测效用。此外,我们发现不同国家的STO临界分数不同。PTSD和CPTSD的内省方法与观察现象学方法之间存在强烈但独特的关联。我们的研究结果呼吁采用更综合的方法来评估PTSD和CPTSD,并表明STO存在文化差异。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2021美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

相似文献

1
Can subjective perceptions of trauma differentiate between ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD? A cross-cultural comparison of three African countries.创伤的主观认知能否区分国际疾病分类第11版中的创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂性PTSD?对三个非洲国家的跨文化比较。
Psychol Trauma. 2021 Feb;13(2):142-148. doi: 10.1037/tra0000966. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
2
Can subjective perceptions of trauma differentiate between ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD? A cross-cultural comparison of three African countries. Correction to Palgi et al. (2021).创伤的主观认知能否区分国际疾病分类第11版中的创伤后应激障碍和复杂性创伤后应激障碍?三个非洲国家的跨文化比较。对帕尔吉等人(2021年)的更正。
Psychol Trauma. 2022 May;14(4):567. doi: 10.1037/tra0001247. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
3
Subjective traumatic outlook as a screening tool for psychological trauma: Cut-off values and diagnostic criteria.主观创伤展望作为心理创伤的筛查工具:截断值和诊断标准。
Psychiatry Res. 2019 Mar;273:121-126. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.01.014. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
4
Fatalism and ICD-11 CPTSD and PTSD diagnoses: results from Nigeria, Kenya & Ghana.宿命论与 ICD-11 复杂性创伤后应激障碍和创伤后应激障碍诊断:来自尼日利亚、肯尼亚和加纳的研究结果。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 Nov 10;12(1):1988452. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.1988452. eCollection 2021.
5
Does requiring trauma exposure affect rates of ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD? Implications for DSM-5.要求有创伤暴露经历是否会影响国际疾病分类第11版(ICD - 11)中创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂性PTSD的发病率?对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版(DSM - 5)的启示。
Psychol Trauma. 2021 Feb;13(2):133-141. doi: 10.1037/tra0000908. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
6
ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD amongst Syrian refugees in Lebanon: the factor structure and the clinical utility of the International Trauma Questionnaire.黎巴嫩的叙利亚难民中的 ICD-11 PTSD 和复杂 PTSD:国际创伤问卷的因子结构和临床实用性。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2018 Dec;138(6):547-557. doi: 10.1111/acps.12973. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
7
Validation of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD using the International Trauma Questionnaire.使用国际创伤问卷验证创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂创伤后应激障碍。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2017 Sep;136(3):313-322. doi: 10.1111/acps.12771. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
8
The International Trauma Questionnaire: development of a self-report measure of ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD.国际创伤问卷:ICD-11 PTSD 和复杂 PTSD 的自评量表的制定。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2018 Dec;138(6):536-546. doi: 10.1111/acps.12956. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
9
Validation of ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD in foster children using the International Trauma Questionnaire.使用国际创伤问卷对寄养儿童的 ICD-11 PTSD 和复杂 PTSD 进行验证。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2020 Jan;141(1):60-73. doi: 10.1111/acps.13100. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
10
Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD (CPTSD) as per ICD-11 proposals: A population study in Israel.创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD)根据 ICD-11 建议:以色列的一项人群研究。
Depress Anxiety. 2018 Mar;35(3):264-274. doi: 10.1002/da.22723. Epub 2018 Feb 16.

引用本文的文献

1
The network structure of ICD-11 complex post-traumatic stress disorder across different traumatic life events.国际疾病分类第11版复杂创伤后应激障碍在不同创伤性生活事件中的网络结构
World Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;19(3):400-401. doi: 10.1002/wps.20795.