• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主观创伤展望作为心理创伤的筛查工具:截断值和诊断标准。

Subjective traumatic outlook as a screening tool for psychological trauma: Cut-off values and diagnostic criteria.

机构信息

School of Social Work, Ariel Science Park, Ariel University, 40700, Israel.

Department of Gerontology, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, 199 Aba Khoushy Ave, Mount Carmel, Haifa 3498838, Israel.

出版信息

Psychiatry Res. 2019 Mar;273:121-126. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.01.014. Epub 2019 Jan 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2019.01.014
PMID:30641341
Abstract

The Subjective Traumatic Outlook (STO) deals with changes in individuals' perception, following a traumatic event and the difficulties of integrating pre-trauma past memories, inner traumatic memories, and current daily life. Although this short scale has excellent psychometric properties its cut-off scores for potential clinical use have yet to be established. In addition, due to the discrepancy between the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) and the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) in the meaurement of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), the present study aimed at revalidating the STO and establishing cut-off scores for potential clinical use, based on both approaches to measure PTSD and complex post-traumatic stress disorder (CPTSD). Three hundred forty-three adults who were recruited through social media apps filled in self-report online questionnaires dealing with subjective perception of psychological trauma, PTSD and CPTSD. Results revalidate the STO as a screening tool for PTSD and CPTSD. We recommend a STO cut-off score of 13 and above when using the ICD-11 PTSD proposed algorithm along the PCL-5 cutoff score and a STO cut-off score of 15 when using the ICD-11 CPTSD proposed algorithm. In light of the present findings, the integration of DSM and ICD approaches is discussed.

摘要

主观创伤展望量表(STO)涉及个体在创伤事件后感知的变化,以及整合创伤前记忆、内在创伤记忆和当前日常生活的困难。尽管这个简短的量表具有出色的心理计量学特性,但仍需确定其用于潜在临床的截断分数。此外,由于《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》(DSM)和《国际疾病分类》(ICD)在创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的测量方面存在差异,本研究旨在基于 PTSD 和复杂创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD)的两种测量方法重新验证 STO,并确定用于潜在临床的截断分数。本研究通过社交媒体应用程序招募了 343 名成年人,他们填写了在线自我报告问卷,涉及心理创伤的主观感知、PTSD 和 CPTSD。研究结果再次验证了 STO 作为 PTSD 和 CPTSD 的筛查工具。我们建议,当使用 ICD-11 PTSD 建议的算法时,STO 的截断分数为 13 分及以上,同时使用 PCL-5 截断分数;当使用 ICD-11 CPTSD 建议的算法时,STO 的截断分数为 15 分。根据本研究的结果,讨论了 DSM 和 ICD 方法的整合。

相似文献

1
Subjective traumatic outlook as a screening tool for psychological trauma: Cut-off values and diagnostic criteria.主观创伤展望作为心理创伤的筛查工具:截断值和诊断标准。
Psychiatry Res. 2019 Mar;273:121-126. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.01.014. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
2
Validation of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD using the International Trauma Questionnaire.使用国际创伤问卷验证创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂创伤后应激障碍。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2017 Sep;136(3):313-322. doi: 10.1111/acps.12771. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
3
Can subjective perceptions of trauma differentiate between ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD? A cross-cultural comparison of three African countries. Correction to Palgi et al. (2021).创伤的主观认知能否区分国际疾病分类第11版中的创伤后应激障碍和复杂性创伤后应激障碍?三个非洲国家的跨文化比较。对帕尔吉等人(2021年)的更正。
Psychol Trauma. 2022 May;14(4):567. doi: 10.1037/tra0001247. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
4
Can subjective perceptions of trauma differentiate between ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD? A cross-cultural comparison of three African countries.创伤的主观认知能否区分国际疾病分类第11版中的创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂性PTSD?对三个非洲国家的跨文化比较。
Psychol Trauma. 2021 Feb;13(2):142-148. doi: 10.1037/tra0000966. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
5
A validation study of the International Trauma Questionnaire to assess post-traumatic stress disorder in treatment-seeking veterans.一项关于国际创伤问卷用于评估寻求治疗的退伍军人创伤后应激障碍的验证研究。
Br J Psychiatry. 2020 Mar;216(3):132-137. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2020.9.
6
Validation of ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD in foster children using the International Trauma Questionnaire.使用国际创伤问卷对寄养儿童的 ICD-11 PTSD 和复杂 PTSD 进行验证。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2020 Jan;141(1):60-73. doi: 10.1111/acps.13100. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
7
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in DSM-5 and ICD-11: Clinical and Behavioral Correlates.DSM-5 和 ICD-11 中的创伤后应激障碍和复杂创伤后应激障碍:临床和行为相关性。
J Trauma Stress. 2018 Apr;31(2):174-180. doi: 10.1002/jts.22272. Epub 2018 Mar 25.
8
The child and Adolescent Trauma Screen 2 (CATS-2) - validation of an instrument to measure DSM-5 and ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD in children and adolescents.儿童和青少年创伤筛查 2 版(CATS-2)——用于测量儿童和青少年 DSM-5 和 ICD-11 创伤后应激障碍和复杂性创伤后应激障碍的工具的验证。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022 Aug 1;13(2):2105580. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2022.2105580. eCollection 2022.
9
Does requiring trauma exposure affect rates of ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD? Implications for DSM-5.要求有创伤暴露经历是否会影响国际疾病分类第11版(ICD - 11)中创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂性PTSD的发病率?对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版(DSM - 5)的启示。
Psychol Trauma. 2021 Feb;13(2):133-141. doi: 10.1037/tra0000908. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
10
Prevalence and predictive value of ICD-11 post-traumatic stress disorder and Complex PTSD diagnoses in children and adolescents exposed to a single-event trauma.儿童和青少年单次创伤后 ICD-11 创伤后应激障碍和复杂创伤后应激障碍诊断的患病率和预测价值。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2021 Mar;62(3):270-276. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13240. Epub 2020 Apr 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of the Italian version of the Neuroception of Psychological Safety Scale (NPSS).意大利版心理安全感神经感知量表(NPSS)的验证
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 16;10(6):e27625. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27625. eCollection 2024 Mar 30.
2
The possible onset of fibromyalgia following acute COVID-19 infection.新冠感染后可能出现纤维肌痛。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 10;18(2):e0281593. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281593. eCollection 2023.