• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国眼科学角膜学领域学术专家的学术排名、学术成果、美国国立卫生研究院经费和行业关系中的性别差异。

Sex Differences in Academic Rank, Scholarly Productivity, National Institutes of Health Funding, and Industry Ties Among Academic Cornea Specialists in the United States.

机构信息

Departments of Ophthalmology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.

Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Feb;222:285-291. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.09.011. Epub 2020 Sep 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajo.2020.09.011
PMID:32941858
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7935744/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study analyzed sex differences among cornea specialists with regards to academic rank, scholarly productivity, National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding, and industry partnerships.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

METHODS

This was a study of faculty at 113 US academic programs. Sex, residency graduation year, and academic rank were collected from institutional websites between January and March 2019. H-indices and m-quotients were collected from the Scopus database. The NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tool and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services databases were queried for data on NIH funding and industry partnerships.

RESULTS

Of the 440 cornea specialists identified, 131 (29.8%) were female. The proportions of females and males at each academic rank (assistant 69.5% vs 41.8%; associate 17.6% vs 21.0%; full professor 13.0% vs 37.2%) were not significant after adjusting for career duration (P = .083, .459, and .113, respectively). Females had significantly lower median h-indices (4.0 [interquartile range {IQR} 7.0] vs 11.0 [IQR 17.0], P < .001) and shorter median career duration (12.0 [IQR 11.0] vs. 25.0 [IQR 20.0] years, P < .001) than males but similar median m-quotients (0.5 [IQR 0.8] vs 0.5 [IQR 0.8], P = 1.00). Sex differences in h-indices were not seen at each academic rank or career duration interval. Among NIH-funded investigators, the median grant funding was $1.6M (IQR $2.2M) for females and $1.2M (IQR $4.6M, P = .853) for males. Overall, 25.5% of females and 58.6% of males (P = .600) had industry partnerships.

CONCLUSION

Sex differences within academic ranks and h-indices are likely due to a smaller proportion of females with advanced career duration.

摘要

目的

本研究分析了角膜专家在学术职称、学术成果、美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)资助和行业合作方面的性别差异。

设计

横断面研究。

方法

这是一项对 113 个美国学术项目的教员进行的研究。2019 年 1 月至 3 月,从机构网站收集了性别、住院医师毕业年份和学术职称。从 Scopus 数据库收集了 H 指数和 m 系数。查询了 NIH 研究组合在线报告工具和医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心数据库,以获取 NIH 资助和行业合作的数据。

结果

在所确定的 440 名角膜专家中,有 131 名(29.8%)为女性。调整职业持续时间后,女性和男性在各学术职称(助理教授 69.5%对 41.8%;副教授 17.6%对 21.0%;正教授 13.0%对 37.2%)的比例无显著差异(P=0.083、0.459 和 0.113)。女性的中位 H 指数明显较低(4.0 [四分位距 {IQR} 7.0] vs 11.0 [IQR 17.0],P <0.001),职业持续时间中位数较短(12.0 [IQR 11.0] vs 25.0 [IQR 20.0] 年,P <0.001),但中位 m 系数相似(0.5 [IQR 0.8] vs 0.5 [IQR 0.8],P=1.00)。在每个学术职称或职业持续时间间隔中,H 指数的性别差异并不明显。在 NIH 资助的调查人员中,女性中位拨款金额为 160 万美元(IQR 220 万美元),男性为 120 万美元(IQR 460 万美元,P=0.853)。总体而言,25.5%的女性和 58.6%的男性(P=0.600)有行业合作关系。

结论

学术职称和 H 指数内的性别差异可能是由于具有较高职业持续时间的女性比例较小所致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a15/7935744/41de38484914/nihms-1628939-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a15/7935744/9c25b12c6a21/nihms-1628939-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a15/7935744/c778332ee074/nihms-1628939-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a15/7935744/41de38484914/nihms-1628939-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a15/7935744/9c25b12c6a21/nihms-1628939-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a15/7935744/c778332ee074/nihms-1628939-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a15/7935744/41de38484914/nihms-1628939-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Sex Differences in Academic Rank, Scholarly Productivity, National Institutes of Health Funding, and Industry Ties Among Academic Cornea Specialists in the United States.美国眼科学角膜学领域学术专家的学术排名、学术成果、美国国立卫生研究院经费和行业关系中的性别差异。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Feb;222:285-291. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.09.011. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
2
Gender disparities among United States academic pediatric ophthalmologists: an analysis of publication productivity, academic rank, and NIH funding.美国学术性儿科眼科医生中的性别差异:出版物产出、学术职级及美国国立卫生研究院资金资助情况分析
J AAPOS. 2020 Dec;24(6):337.e1-337.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2020.06.013. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
3
Sex Disparities in Productivity among Oculoplastic Surgeons.眼整形外科医生生产力方面的性别差异。
J Acad Ophthalmol (2017). 2021 Dec 5;13(2):e210-e215. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1740312. eCollection 2021 Jul.
4
The association between scholarly impact and National Institutes of Health funding in ophthalmology.眼科领域学术影响力与美国国立卫生研究院资助的相关性研究。
Ophthalmology. 2014 Jan;121(1):423-428. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.08.009. Epub 2013 Sep 23.
5
Gender differences in publication productivity, academic position, career duration, and funding among U.S. academic radiation oncology faculty.美国学术放射肿瘤学教师群体中的发表生产力、学术地位、职业持续时间和资金方面的性别差异。
Acad Med. 2014 May;89(5):767-73. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000229.
6
Sex Differences in Academic Rank and Publication Rate at Top-Ranked US Neurology Programs.顶尖美国神经病学项目的学术排名和发表率中的性别差异。
JAMA Neurol. 2018 Aug 1;75(8):956-961. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.0275.
7
Gender differences in funding among grant recipients in emergency medicine: A multicenter analysis.在急诊医学领域,资助获得者中的性别差异:一项多中心分析。
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Jul;38(7):1357-1361. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.11.006. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
8
Is there a relationship between National Institutes of Health funding and research impact on academic urology?美国国立卫生研究院的资助与学术泌尿科研究的影响力之间是否存在关系?
J Urol. 2013 Sep;190(3):999-1003. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.3186. Epub 2013 Mar 1.
9
Assessing National Institutes of Health funding and scholarly impact in neurological surgery.评估美国国立卫生研究院在神经外科学领域的资金投入和学术影响力。
J Neurosurg. 2014 Jan;120(1):191-6. doi: 10.3171/2013.8.JNS13938. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
10
Men Receive Three Times More Industry Payments than Women Academic Orthopaedic Surgeons, Even After Controlling for Confounding Variables.男性骨科医生的行业收入比女性同行高出三倍,即使在控制了混杂变量后也是如此。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jul;478(7):1593-1599. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001132.

引用本文的文献

1
A Seven-Decade Analysis: What Does the Gender Breakdown of Award Recipients in the All India Ophthalmological Society Reveal?一项长达七十年的分析:全印度眼科学会获奖者的性别分布揭示了什么?
Cureus. 2025 May 19;17(5):e84438. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84438. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Analysis of Publication Productivity and Academic Rank of Ophthalmology Residency Program Directors in the United States.美国眼科住院医师培训项目主任的发表生产力与学术排名分析
Cureus. 2023 Aug 5;15(8):e42989. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42989. eCollection 2023 Aug.
3
Gender Disparities Among Academic Vitreoretinal Specialists in the United States With Regard to Scholarly Impact and Academic Rank.

本文引用的文献

1
Association Between Sex Composition and Publication Productivity of Journal Editorial and Professional Society Board Members in Ophthalmology.眼科杂志编辑和专业学会理事会成员的性别构成与出版生产力之间的关联。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020 May 1;138(5):451-458. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.0164.
2
Chairs of United States Academic Ophthalmology Departments: A Descriptive Analysis and Trends.美国眼科学术部门主席:描述性分析与趋势。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2018 Dec;196:26-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.08.016. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
3
Discrepancies among Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed coverage of funding information in medical journal articles.
美国玻璃体视网膜专科领域学术专家在学术影响力和学术排名方面的性别差异。
Cureus. 2023 Jun 4;15(6):e39936. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39936. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
The Extent of Gender Gap in Citations in Ophthalmology Literature.眼科文献中引用方面的性别差距程度。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 May 18;9:855385. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.855385. eCollection 2022.
医学期刊文章中Scopus、科学引文索引(Web of Science)和医学期刊数据库(PubMed)在资助信息覆盖方面的差异。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2018 Jan;106(1):81-86. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2018.181. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
4
Representation of Women With Industry Ties in Ophthalmology.有业界关系的女性在眼科学领域的代表性。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Jun 1;134(6):636-43. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.0552.
5
Gender differences in promotion and scholarly impact: an analysis of 1460 academic ophthalmologists.晋升与学术影响力方面的性别差异:对1460名眼科专科医生的分析
J Surg Educ. 2014 Nov-Dec;71(6):851-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.03.015. Epub 2014 May 20.
6
Gender differences in successful National Institutes of Health funding in ophthalmology.美国国立卫生研究院眼科领域成功获得资助中的性别差异。
J Surg Educ. 2014 Sep-Oct;71(5):680-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.01.020. Epub 2014 Apr 26.
7
Strengthened ties between industry and academia are historical, productive, and crucial.加强产业界与学术界之间的联系具有历史意义、富有成效且至关重要。
Surv Ophthalmol. 2014 May-Jun;59(3):348-53. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2013.07.004. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
8
Is there a relationship between National Institutes of Health funding and research impact on academic urology?美国国立卫生研究院的资助与学术泌尿科研究的影响力之间是否存在关系?
J Urol. 2013 Sep;190(3):999-1003. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.3186. Epub 2013 Mar 1.
9
Research grants: Conform and be funded.研究经费:符合要求并获得资助。
Nature. 2012 Dec 6;492(7427):34-6. doi: 10.1038/492034a.
10
How honest is the h-index in measuring individual research output?h指数在衡量个人研究产出方面的可信度如何?
J Postgrad Med. 2011 Jul-Sep;57(3):264-5. doi: 10.4103/0022-3859.85233.