Suppr超能文献

认知责任——费力、放松与丧失:阿尔茨海默病的分期

Epistemic Responsibility - Labored, Loosened, and Lost: Staging Alzheimer's Disease.

作者信息

Schrauf Robert W

机构信息

The Pennsylvania State University.

出版信息

J Pragmat. 2020 Oct;168:56-68. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.07.003. Epub 2020 Aug 1.

Abstract

Interlocutors hold one another accountable for knowing certain information about themselves (their roles, activities, and memories) and for keeping track of information in the current conversational exchange. When speakers have trouble with this expectation, they themselves work to repair the breach, often doing a memory search, or when unsuccessful they provide an account (e.g. "I don't remember"). Memory searches (like word searches) are observable, interactional accomplishments. Speakers disengage with their interlocutors (look away), produce hesitation markers, take repeated pauses, engage in pre-positioned and post-positioned repairs, make epistemic assessments, and on finding an answer, re-engage with their interlocutors (look back). For their part, interlocutors comply with the search by not interrupting and continuing to yield the floor. At progressively severe stages of Alzheimer's disease, individuals exhibit increasingly labored memory searches that often trail off into non-answers, until at the latest stages, they eschew the search and (almost smoothly) provide either grammatically appropriate but wrong and improbable answers give answers to previous questions on now closed topics. With data from the clinical administration of a disease staging instrument (Clinical Dementia Rating) this article examines the inexorable loss of epistemic responsibility as a key discursive dynamic in the progression of the disease.

摘要

对话者期望彼此知晓关于自身的某些信息(其角色、活动和记忆),并在当前对话交流中跟踪信息。当说话者在这一期望上遇到困难时,他们会自行努力修复这种脱节,通常会进行记忆搜索,若未成功则会给出解释(例如“我不记得了”)。记忆搜索(如同单词搜索)是可观察到的互动行为。说话者会与对话者中断互动(看向别处),发出犹豫信号,多次停顿,进行前置和后置修复,做出认知评估,找到答案后再与对话者重新互动(看向对方)。而对话者则通过不打断并继续让出话语权来配合搜索。在阿尔茨海默病逐渐严重的阶段,患者进行记忆搜索时愈发吃力,往往无果而终,直至疾病晚期,他们不再进行搜索,而是(几乎顺畅地)给出语法正确但错误且不合理的答案,或者对已结束话题的先前问题给出答案。本文利用一种疾病分期工具(临床痴呆评定量表)临床应用的数据,探讨了认知责任的必然丧失作为该疾病进展过程中的关键话语动态。

相似文献

4
8
Early object relations into new objects.早期客体关系转变为新的客体。
Psychoanal Study Child. 2001;56:39-67; discussion 68-75. doi: 10.1080/00797308.2001.11800664.
9
Selegiline for Alzheimer's disease.司来吉兰用于治疗阿尔茨海默病。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(1):CD000442. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000442.

本文引用的文献

6
Clinical applications of neuropsychological assessment.神经心理学评估的临床应用
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2012 Mar;14(1):91-9. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2012.14.1/pharvey.
10
A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia.一种用于痴呆分期的新临床量表。
Br J Psychiatry. 1982 Jun;140:566-72. doi: 10.1192/bjp.140.6.566.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验