Rogers Richard G, Hummer Robert A, Vinneau Justin M, Lawrence Elizabeth M
Department of Sociology and Population Program, Institute of Behavioral Science (IBS), University of Colorado Boulder, USA.
Department of Sociology and Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
Demogr Res. 2020 Jan-Jun;42:1039-1056. doi: 10.4054/demres.2020.42.36. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
Over the past several decades, US mortality declines have lagged behind other high-income countries. However, scant attention has been devoted to how US mortality variability compares with other countries.
We examine trends in mortality and mortality variability in the US and 16 peer countries from 1980 through 2016.
We employ the Human Mortality Database and demographic techniques - with a focus on patterns in the interquartile (IQR), interdecile (IDR), and intercentile (ICR) ranges of survivorship - to better understand US mortality and mortality variability trends in comparative perspective.
Compared to other high-income countries, the US: (1) mortality ranking has slipped for nearly all age groups; (2) is losing its old age mortality advantage; (3) has seen growth in relative age-specific mortality gaps from infancy through midlife; and (4) exhibits greater concentrations of deaths from infancy through adulthood, resulting in much greater mortality variability.
We contribute to calls for renewed attention to the relatively low and lagging US life expectancy. The ICR draws particular attention to the comparatively high US early and midlife mortality.
We find comparatively high variability in US mortality. Further reductions in early and midlife mortality could diminish variability, reduce years of potential life lost, and increase life expectancy. Consistent with previous research, we encourage policymakers to focus on reducing the unacceptably high early and midlife mortality in the US. And we urge researchers to more frequently monitor and track mortality variation in conjunction with mortality rates and life expectancy estimates.
在过去几十年里,美国死亡率的下降落后于其他高收入国家。然而,很少有人关注美国死亡率的变异性与其他国家相比情况如何。
我们研究了1980年至2016年美国和16个同类国家的死亡率及死亡率变异性趋势。
我们利用人类死亡率数据库和人口统计学技术——重点关注生存四分位距(IQR)、十分位距(IDR)和百分位距(ICR)范围内的模式——以便从比较的角度更好地理解美国死亡率及死亡率变异性趋势。
与其他高收入国家相比,美国:(1)几乎所有年龄组的死亡率排名都有所下滑;(2)正在失去其在老年死亡率方面的优势;(3)从婴儿期到中年,特定年龄死亡率的相对差距有所扩大;(4)从婴儿期到成年期死亡更为集中,导致死亡率变异性大得多。
我们响应了呼吁,即重新关注美国相对较低且滞后的预期寿命。百分位距尤其凸显了美国早期和中年相对较高的死亡率。
我们发现美国死亡率的变异性相对较高。进一步降低早期和中年死亡率可以减少变异性,减少潜在寿命损失年数,并提高预期寿命。与先前的研究一致,我们鼓励政策制定者专注于降低美国早期和中年高得令人无法接受的死亡率。并且我们敦促研究人员更频繁地结合死亡率和预期寿命估计来监测和跟踪死亡率变化。