Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Faculty of Psychology and Sports Science, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Elife. 2020 Sep 18;9:e57804. doi: 10.7554/eLife.57804.
When humans indicate on which hand a tactile stimulus occurred, they often err when their hands are crossed. This finding seemingly supports the view that the automatically determined touch location in external space affects limb assignment: the crossed right hand is localized in left space, and this conflict presumably provokes hand assignment errors. Here, participants judged on which hand the first of two stimuli, presented during a bimanual movement, had occurred, and then indicated its external location by a reach-to-point movement. When participants incorrectly chose the hand stimulated second, they pointed to where that hand had been at the correct, first time point, though no stimulus had occurred at that location. This behavior suggests that stimulus localization depended on hand assignment, not vice versa. It is, thus, incompatible with the notion of automatic computation of external stimulus location upon occurrence. Instead, humans construct external touch location post-hoc and on demand.
当人类指出触觉刺激发生在哪只手上时,当他们的手交叉时,他们经常会出错。这一发现似乎支持了这样一种观点,即自动确定的外部空间中的触摸位置会影响肢体分配:交叉的右手位于左手空间中,这种冲突可能会引发手部分配错误。在这里,参与者判断两个刺激中的第一个在什么时候出现在两只手上,然后通过伸手指向的动作来指示其外部位置。当参与者错误地选择了第二个受到刺激的手时,他们指向了那个手在正确的、第一次出现的位置,尽管在那个位置没有出现刺激。这种行为表明,刺激定位取决于手部分配,而不是相反。因此,这与发生时自动计算外部刺激位置的观点不一致。相反,人类是事后和按需构建外部触摸位置的。