• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电风暴伴瘢痕相关左心室功能障碍患者消融时机与预后

Timing of Ablation and Prognosis of Patients With Electrical Storm and Scar-Related Left Ventricular Dysfunction.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, IBSAL-University Hospital, CIVER-CV, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.

Department of Cardiology, IBSAL-University Hospital, CIVER-CV, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2020 Dec 1;136:87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.09.010. Epub 2020 Sep 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.09.010
PMID:32946863
Abstract

Although radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) is indicated in electrical storm (ES) refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs, its most appropriate timing has not been determined. Our objective is to analyse the impact of the timing of RFCA on 30-day mortality in patients with ES and previous scar-related systolic dysfunction. In this multi-centre study, we analysed 104 patients (age: 72 ± 10, left ventricular ejection fraction: 30 ± 6%) attended consecutively due to an ES caused by monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. Sixty-four subjects were treated with RFCA (mean time from admission = 83 ± 67 hours) and 40 were not. Upon admission 25 (24%) individuals had severe heart failure. Mortality rate at 30 days was 24 (23%) patients. RFCA was associated with a reduction of 30-day mortality (hazard ratio = 0.2; p = 0.008). After showing a positive correlation between the time of the RFCA (hours) and survival at 30 days (C-statistic = 0.77; p <0.001), we found that only subjects ablated >48 hours after admission had lower mortality at 30 days than those treated conservatively: 38% (no RFCA) versus 30% (RFCA ≤48 hours) versus 7% (RFCA >48 hours) (adjusted hazard ratio for RFCA >48 hours vs others = 0.2; p = 0.007). Among the patients ablated, those who were non-inducible had lower 30-day mortality: 8% versus 29% (p = 0.03). Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was associated with a higher rate of non-inducibility in RFCA >48 hours (100% vs 76%; p = 0.03), but not in RFCA ≤48 hours (60% vs 60%; p = 1). In conclusion, among high-risk patients with ES, RFCA performed >48 hours after admission is associated with a reduction in 30-day mortality. In such subjects, the probability of successful RFCA increases when performed under extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support.

摘要

尽管射频导管消融 (RFCA) 适用于对抗心律失常药物无效的电风暴 (ES),但其最合适的时机尚未确定。我们的目的是分析 RFCA 时机对 ES 合并先前瘢痕相关收缩功能障碍患者 30 天死亡率的影响。在这项多中心研究中,我们分析了 104 例因单形性室性心动过速引起的 ES 连续就诊的患者 (年龄:72 ± 10 岁,左心室射血分数:30 ± 6%)。64 例患者接受了 RFCA 治疗 (平均入院时间为 83 ± 67 小时),40 例未接受治疗。入院时,25 例 (24%)患者有严重心力衰竭。30 天死亡率为 24 例 (23%)患者。RFCA 与 30 天死亡率降低相关 (风险比=0.2;p=0.008)。在显示 RFCA 时间 (小时)与 30 天生存时间之间存在正相关 (C 统计量=0.77;p<0.001)后,我们发现仅在入院后 >48 小时进行消融的患者在 30 天死亡率低于保守治疗者:38% (无 RFCA) 与 30% (RFCA ≤48 小时) 与 7% (RFCA >48 小时) (校正后的 RFCA >48 小时与其他因素的风险比为 0.2;p=0.007)。在接受消融治疗的患者中,非诱发性患者的 30 天死亡率较低:8% 与 29% (p=0.03)。体外膜肺氧合与 RFCA >48 小时时非诱发性发生率较高相关 (100% 比 76%;p=0.03),但与 RFCA ≤48 小时时无关 (60% 比 60%;p=1)。总之,在 ES 高危患者中,入院后 >48 小时进行 RFCA 与 30 天死亡率降低相关。在这些患者中,在体外膜肺氧合支持下进行 RFCA 可提高成功率。

相似文献

1
Timing of Ablation and Prognosis of Patients With Electrical Storm and Scar-Related Left Ventricular Dysfunction.电风暴伴瘢痕相关左心室功能障碍患者消融时机与预后
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Dec 1;136:87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.09.010. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
2
Long-term outcome of catheter ablation and other form of therapy for electrical storm in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.植入式心脏复律除颤器患者电风暴的导管消融及其他治疗形式的长期结果
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2017 Dec;50(3):227-234. doi: 10.1007/s10840-017-0291-1. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
3
Feasibility and safety of catheter ablation of electrical storm in ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.缺血性扩张型心肌病电风暴导管消融的可行性与安全性
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2016 Jun;17(6):425-32. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000259.
4
Urgent catheter ablation for sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with acute heart failure decompensation.急性心力衰竭失代偿患者持续性室性心动过速的紧急导管消融。
Europace. 2014 Jan;16(1):92-100. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut207. Epub 2013 Jul 14.
5
Outcome of rescue ablation in patients with refractory ventricular electrical storm requiring mechanical circulation support.需要机械循环支持的难治性室性电风暴患者抢救消融的结果。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 Jan;31(1):9-17. doi: 10.1111/jce.14309. Epub 2019 Dec 15.
6
Scar dechanneling: new method for scar-related left ventricular tachycardia substrate ablation.瘢痕去通道化:一种治疗与瘢痕相关的左心室性心动过速的新方法。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015 Apr;8(2):326-36. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.114.002386. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
7
Acute hemodynamic decompensation during catheter ablation of scar-related ventricular tachycardia: incidence, predictors, and impact on mortality.心脏瘢痕相关性室性心动过速导管消融术中的急性血液动力学失代偿:发生率、预测因素及对死亡率的影响。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015 Feb;8(1):68-75. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.114.002155. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
8
Beyond the Storm: Comparison of Clinical Factors, Arrhythmogenic Substrate, and Catheter Ablation Outcomes in Structural Heart Disease Patients With versus Those Without a History of Ventricular Tachycardia Storm.风暴之外:有与无室性心动过速风暴病史的结构性心脏病患者临床因素、致心律失常基质及导管消融结果的比较
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2017 Jan;28(1):56-67. doi: 10.1111/jce.13117. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
9
Drug-refractory ventricular tachycardias after myocarditis: endocardial and epicardial radiofrequency catheter ablation.心肌炎后药物难治性室性心动过速:心内膜和心外膜射频导管消融。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012 Jun 1;5(3):492-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.111.965012. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
10
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Hemodynamic Support of Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation.用于室性心动过速消融血流动力学支持的体外膜肺氧合
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016 Dec;9(12). doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.116.004492.

引用本文的文献

1
Pre-ablation and Post-ablation Factors Influencing the Prognosis of Patients with Electrical Storm Treated by Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation: An Update.影响射频导管消融治疗电风暴患者预后的消融前及消融后因素:最新进展
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Dec 5;25(12):432. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2512432. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Characteristics and Outcome of Patients with or without Previous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Interventions Undergoing Ablation for Ventricular Tachycardia.有或无既往植入式心脏复律除颤器干预的室性心动过速患者接受消融治疗的特征及结局
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 22;13(16):4958. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164958.
3
Management of patients with an electrical storm or clustered ventricular arrhythmias: a clinical consensus statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the ESC-endorsed by the Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, Heart Rhythm Society, and Latin-American Heart Rhythm Society.
管理电风暴或簇发性室性心律失常患者:欧洲心脏病学会心律协会的临床共识声明——由亚太心律学会、心律学会和拉丁美洲心律学会认可。
Europace. 2024 Mar 30;26(4). doi: 10.1093/europace/euae049.
4
MSA-VT Score for Assessment of Long-Term Prognosis after Electrical Storm Ablation.用于评估电风暴消融术后长期预后的MSA-VT评分
Biomedicines. 2024 Feb 22;12(3):493. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12030493.
5
'A series of unfortunate events': a case report of infective endocarditis resulting from ventricular arrhythmia ablation.“一系列不幸事件”:一例因室性心律失常消融导致感染性心内膜炎的病例报告
Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2023 Nov 27;7(12):ytad604. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytad604. eCollection 2023 Dec.
6
Multidisciplinary Critical Care Management of Electrical Storm: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.心律失常风暴的多学科重症监护管理:JACC 最新技术评价
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023 Jun 6;81(22):2189-2206. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.03.424.
7
Monomorphic VT Non-Inducibility after Electrical Storm Ablation Reduces Mortality and Recurrences.电风暴消融术后单形性室性心动过速不能诱发性可降低死亡率和复发率。
J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 4;11(13):3887. doi: 10.3390/jcm11133887.
8
A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing radiofrequency catheter ablation with medical therapy for ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathies.比较射频导管消融与药物治疗缺血性和非缺血性心肌病伴室性心动过速患者的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2023 Jan;66(1):161-175. doi: 10.1007/s10840-022-01287-w. Epub 2022 Jun 27.