• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脓毒症诊断:重症监护评分系统优于微小RNA生物标志物检测。

Sepsis Diagnostics: Intensive Care Scoring Systems Superior to MicroRNA Biomarker Testing.

作者信息

Link Fabian, Krohn Knut, Burgdorff Anna-Maria, Christel Annett, Schumann Julia

机构信息

Clinic for Anesthesiology and Surgical Intensive Care, University Hospital Halle (Saale), 06120 Halle, Germany.

Core Unit DNA Technologies, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Sep 16;10(9):701. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10090701.

DOI:10.3390/diagnostics10090701
PMID:32948040
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7555112/
Abstract

Sepsis represents a serious medical problem accounting for numerous deaths of critically ill patients in intensive care units (ICUs). An early, sensitive, and specific diagnosis is considered a key element for improving the outcome of sepsis patients. In addition to classical laboratory markers, ICU scoring systems and serum miRNAs are discussed as potential sepsis biomarkers. In the present prospective observational study, the suitability of miRNAs in sepsis diagnosis was tested based on proper validated and normalized data (i.e., absolute quantification by means of Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR)) in direct comparison to classical sepsis markers and ICU scores within the same patient cohort. Therefore, blood samples of septic intensive care patients ( = 12) taken at day of admission at ICU were compared to non-septic intensive care patients ( = 12) and a healthy control group ( = 12). Our analysis indicates that all tested biomarkers have only a moderate informative power and do not allow an unequivocal differentiation between septic and non-septic ICU patients. In conclusion, there is no standalone laboratory parameter that enables a reliable diagnosis of sepsis. miRNAs are not superior to classical parameters in this respect. It seems recommendable to measure multiple parameters and scores and to interpret them with regard to the clinical presentation.

摘要

脓毒症是一个严重的医学问题,导致重症监护病房(ICU)中众多重症患者死亡。早期、灵敏且特异的诊断被认为是改善脓毒症患者预后的关键因素。除了传统的实验室指标外,ICU评分系统和血清微小RNA(miRNA)也被作为潜在的脓毒症生物标志物进行讨论。在本前瞻性观察研究中,基于经过适当验证和标准化的数据(即通过液滴数字PCR(ddPCR)进行绝对定量),对miRNA在脓毒症诊断中的适用性进行了测试,并与同一患者队列中的传统脓毒症标志物和ICU评分进行直接比较。因此,将入住ICU当天采集的脓毒症重症监护患者(n = 12)的血样与非脓毒症重症监护患者(n = 12)和健康对照组(n = 12)进行比较。我们的分析表明,所有测试的生物标志物的信息价值都仅为中等,无法明确区分脓毒症和非脓毒症ICU患者。总之,没有单一的实验室参数能够可靠地诊断脓毒症。在这方面,miRNA并不优于传统参数。测量多个参数和评分并结合临床表现进行解读似乎是可取的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf1a/7555112/d3cc81f39fdc/diagnostics-10-00701-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf1a/7555112/d016f4266da9/diagnostics-10-00701-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf1a/7555112/c87a8521f9a1/diagnostics-10-00701-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf1a/7555112/18a87bb89713/diagnostics-10-00701-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf1a/7555112/9257eb9976b6/diagnostics-10-00701-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf1a/7555112/f4479fd2a815/diagnostics-10-00701-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf1a/7555112/d3cc81f39fdc/diagnostics-10-00701-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf1a/7555112/d016f4266da9/diagnostics-10-00701-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf1a/7555112/c87a8521f9a1/diagnostics-10-00701-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf1a/7555112/18a87bb89713/diagnostics-10-00701-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf1a/7555112/9257eb9976b6/diagnostics-10-00701-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf1a/7555112/f4479fd2a815/diagnostics-10-00701-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf1a/7555112/d3cc81f39fdc/diagnostics-10-00701-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Sepsis Diagnostics: Intensive Care Scoring Systems Superior to MicroRNA Biomarker Testing.脓毒症诊断:重症监护评分系统优于微小RNA生物标志物检测。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Sep 16;10(9):701. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10090701.
2
Sepsis Care Pathway 2019.2019年脓毒症护理路径
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):4. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.4. eCollection 2019.
3
A Molecular Host Response Assay to Discriminate Between Sepsis and Infection-Negative Systemic Inflammation in Critically Ill Patients: Discovery and Validation in Independent Cohorts.一种用于区分重症患者脓毒症与感染阴性全身炎症反应的分子宿主反应检测方法:在独立队列中的发现与验证
PLoS Med. 2015 Dec 8;12(12):e1001916. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001916. eCollection 2015 Dec.
4
[Intestinal barrier dysfunction and its related factors in patients with sepsis].[脓毒症患者的肠道屏障功能障碍及其相关因素]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2016 Nov 29;96(44):3568-3572. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2016.44.007.
5
[Predictive value of four different scoring systems for septic patient's outcome: a retrospective analysis with 311 patients].[四种不同评分系统对脓毒症患者预后的预测价值:311例患者的回顾性分析]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2017 Feb;29(2):133-138. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2017.02.008.
6
Elevated serum levels of lipoprotein‑associated phospholipase A2 predict mortality rates in patients with sepsis.脂蛋白相关磷脂酶 A2 水平升高可预测脓毒症患者的死亡率。
Mol Med Rep. 2018 Jan;17(1):1791-1798. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2017.8034. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
7
[Comparison of simplified acute physiology score III and other scoring systems in prediction of 28-day prognosis in patients with severe sepsis].[简化急性生理学评分III与其他评分系统对严重脓毒症患者28天预后预测的比较]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2015 Jun;27(6):454-9. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2015.06.008.
8
Survival analysis of 314 episodes of sepsis in medical intensive care unit in university hospital: impact of intensive care unit performance and antimicrobial therapy.大学医院医学重症监护病房314例脓毒症发作的生存分析:重症监护病房性能及抗菌治疗的影响
Croat Med J. 2006 Jun;47(3):385-97.
9
A combination of SOFA score and biomarkers gives a better prediction of septic AKI and in-hospital mortality in critically ill surgical patients: a pilot study.SOFA 评分与生物标志物联合应用可更好地预测重症外科患者脓毒症急性肾损伤和住院病死率:一项初步研究。
World J Emerg Surg. 2018 Sep 10;13:41. doi: 10.1186/s13017-018-0202-5. eCollection 2018.
10
Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score Is Superior to the Obstetric-Specific Sepsis in Obstetrics Score in Predicting Mortality in Septic Obstetric Patients.在预测产科脓毒症患者死亡率方面,多器官功能障碍评分优于产科特异性脓毒症评分。
Crit Care Med. 2017 Jan;45(1):e49-e57. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002018.

引用本文的文献

1
The Diagnostic Utility of Host RNA Biosignatures in Adult Patients With Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.宿主RNA生物标志物在成年脓毒症患者中的诊断效用:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
Crit Care Explor. 2025 Jan 31;7(2):e1212. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001212. eCollection 2025 Feb 1.
2
Evaluation of circulating levels of miR-135a and miR-193 in patients with sepsis.评估脓毒症患者循环 miR-135a 和 miR-193 的水平。
Mol Biol Rep. 2024 Feb 7;51(1):282. doi: 10.1007/s11033-024-09225-x.
3
Digital PCR applications for the diagnosis and management of infection in critical care medicine.

本文引用的文献

1
Identification of stably expressed housekeeping miRNAs in endothelial cells and macrophages in an inflammatory setting.鉴定炎症环境中血管内皮细胞和巨噬细胞中稳定表达的管家 miRNAs。
Sci Rep. 2019 Sep 4;9(1):12786. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49241-7.
2
Droplet digital PCR improves urinary exosomal miRNA detection compared to real-time PCR.与实时 PCR 相比,液滴数字 PCR 可提高尿外泌体 miRNA 的检测。
Clin Biochem. 2019 May;67:54-59. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2019.03.008. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
3
Surviving sepsis campaign: research priorities for sepsis and septic shock.
数字 PCR 在重症监护医学感染诊断和管理中的应用。
Crit Care. 2022 Mar 21;26(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-03948-8.
拯救脓毒症运动:脓毒症和脓毒性休克的研究重点。
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Sep;44(9):1400-1426. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5175-z. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
4
Circulating microRNAs as potential cancer biomarkers: the advantage and disadvantage.循环 microRNAs 作为潜在的癌症生物标志物:优势和劣势。
Clin Epigenetics. 2018 Apr 23;10:59. doi: 10.1186/s13148-018-0492-1. eCollection 2018.
5
Cellular and extracellular miRNAs are blood-compartment-specific diagnostic targets in sepsis.细胞外和细胞内的 microRNA 是脓毒症中血液 compartment 特异性的诊断靶标。
J Cell Mol Med. 2017 Oct;21(10):2403-2411. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.13162. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
6
Circulating microRNAs as Potential Biomarkers of Infectious Disease.循环微小RNA作为传染病的潜在生物标志物
Front Immunol. 2017 Feb 16;8:118. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00118. eCollection 2017.
7
Incidence of severe sepsis and septic shock in German intensive care units: the prospective, multicentre INSEP study.德国重症监护病房严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的发生率:前瞻性、多中心 INSEP 研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Dec;42(12):1980-1989. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4504-3. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
8
A comparison between quantitative PCR and droplet digital PCR technologies for circulating microRNA quantification in human lung cancer.定量PCR与数字液滴PCR技术在人肺癌循环微小RNA定量分析中的比较
BMC Biotechnol. 2016 Aug 18;16(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12896-016-0292-7.
9
Diagnosing sepsis - The role of laboratory medicine.诊断脓毒症——检验医学的作用。
Clin Chim Acta. 2016 Sep 1;460:203-10. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2016.07.002. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
10
Circulating Plasma microRNAs can differentiate Human Sepsis and Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS).循环血浆 microRNAs 可区分人类脓毒症和全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)。
Sci Rep. 2016 Jun 20;6:28006. doi: 10.1038/srep28006.