Suppr超能文献

识别美国高贫困率且幸福指数高的县的特征:一项观察性横断面研究。

Identifying characteristics of high-poverty counties in the United States with high well-being: an observational cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Arora Anita, Spatz Erica S, Herrin Jeph, Riley Carley, Roy Brita, Rula Elizabeth Y, Kell Kenneth Patton, Krumholz Harlan M

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA

Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 17;10(9):e035645. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035645.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify county characteristics associated with high versus low well-being among high-poverty counties.

DESIGN

Observational cross-sectional study at the county level to investigate the associations of 29 county characteristics with the odds of a high-poverty county reporting population well-being in the top quintile versus the bottom quintile of well-being in the USA. County characteristics representing key determinants of health were drawn from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation County Health Rankings and Roadmaps population health model.

SETTING

Counties in the USA that are in the highest quartile of poverty rate.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Gallup-Sharecare Well-being Index, a comprehensive population-level measure of physical, mental and social health. Counties were classified as having a well-being index score in the top or bottom 20% of all counties in the USA.

RESULTS

Among 770 high-poverty counties, 72 were categorised as having high well-being and 311 as having low well-being. The high-well-being counties had a mean well-being score of 71.8 with a SD of 2.3, while the low-well-being counties had a mean well-being score of 60.2 with a SD of 2.8. Among the six domains of well-being, basic access, which includes access to housing and healthcare, and life evaluation, which includes life satisfaction and optimism, differed the most between high-being and low-well-being counties. Among 29 county characteristics tested, six were independently and significantly associated with high well-being (p<0.05). These were lower rates of preventable hospital stays, higher supply of primary care physicians, lower prevalence of smoking, lower physical inactivity, higher percentage of some college education and higher percentage of heavy drinkers.

CONCLUSIONS

Among 770 high-poverty counties, approximately 9% outperformed expectations, reporting a collective well-being score in the top 20% of all counties in the USA. High-poverty counties reporting high well-being differed from high-poverty counties reporting low well-being in several characteristics.

摘要

目的

确定高贫困县中与高幸福感和低幸福感相关的县特征。

设计

县级观察性横断面研究,以调查29个县特征与高贫困县报告的人口幸福感处于美国幸福感前五分位数与后五分位数的几率之间的关联。代表健康关键决定因素的县特征来自罗伯特·伍德·约翰逊基金会县健康排名和路线图人口健康模型。

地点

美国贫困率处于最高四分位数的县。

主要结局指标

盖洛普-Sharecare幸福感指数,这是一项对身体、心理和社会健康的综合人群水平测量指标。各县被分类为幸福感指数得分在美国所有县的前20%或后20%。

结果

在770个高贫困县中,72个被归类为高幸福感县,311个被归类为低幸福感县。高幸福感县的平均幸福感得分为71.8,标准差为2.3,而低幸福感县的平均幸福感得分为60.2,标准差为2.8。在幸福感的六个领域中,高幸福感县和低幸福感县之间差异最大的是基本生活条件(包括住房和医疗保健)以及生活评价(包括生活满意度和乐观情绪)。在测试的29个县特征中,有六个与高幸福感独立且显著相关(p<0.05)。这些特征包括可预防住院率较低、初级保健医生供应较高、吸烟率较低、身体活动不足率较低、接受过某种大学教育的百分比较高以及重度饮酒者百分比较高。

结论

在770个高贫困县中,约9%的县表现超出预期,其总体幸福感得分在美国所有县的前20%。报告高幸福感的高贫困县与报告低幸福感的高贫困县在几个特征上有所不同。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/339c/7500307/1511fab37dcb/bmjopen-2019-035645f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验