Ter Avest Ewoud, Taylor Sam, Wilson Mark, Lyon Richard L
Air Ambulance Kent Surrey and Sussex, Redhill, Surrey, UK
Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Emerg Med J. 2021 Jan;38(1):21-26. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-209635. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
For the prehospital diagnosis of raised intracranial pressure (ICP), clinicians are reliant on clinical signs such as the Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), pupillary response and/or Cushing's triad (hypertension, bradycardia and an irregular breathing pattern). This study aimed to explore the diagnostic accuracy of these signs as indicators of a raised ICP.
We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult patients attended by a Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (Air Ambulance Kent, Surrey Sussex), who had sustained a traumatic brain injury (TBI), requiring prehospital anaesthesia between 1 January 2016 and 1 January 2018. We established optimal cut-off values for clinical signs to identify patients with a raised ICP and investigated diagnostic accuracy for combinations of these values.
Outcome data for 249 patients with TBI were available, of which 87 (35%) had a raised ICP. Optimal cut-off points for systolic blood pressure (SBP), heart rate (HR) and pupil diameter to discriminate patients with a raised ICP were, respectively, >160 mm Hg,<60 bpm and >5 mm. Cushing criteria (SBP >160 mm Hg and HR <60 bpm) and pupillary response and size were complimentary in their ability to detect patients with a raised ICP. The presence of a fixed blown pupil or a Cushing's response had a specificity of 93.2 (88.2-96.6)%, and a positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of 5.4 (2.9-10.2), whereas sensitivity and LR- were only 36.8 (26.7-47.8)% and 0.7 (0.6-0.8), respectively, (Area Under the Curve (AUC) 0.65 (0.57-0.73)). Sensitivity analysis revealed that optimal cut-off values and resultant accuracy were dependent on injury pattern.
Traditional clinical signs of raised ICP may under triage patients to prehospital treatment with hyperosmolar drugs. Further research should identify more accurate clinical signs or alternative non-invasive diagnostic aids in the prehospital environment.
对于院前颅内压(ICP)升高的诊断,临床医生依赖于格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)、瞳孔反应和/或库欣三联征(高血压、心动过缓和呼吸节律不规则)等临床体征。本研究旨在探讨这些体征作为ICP升高指标的诊断准确性。
我们对2016年1月1日至2018年1月1日期间由直升机紧急医疗服务(肯特、萨里和苏塞克斯空中救护)接诊的成年创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究,这些患者需要院前麻醉。我们确定了用于识别ICP升高患者的临床体征的最佳截断值,并研究了这些值组合的诊断准确性。
获得了249例TBI患者的结局数据,其中87例(35%)ICP升高。用于区分ICP升高患者的收缩压(SBP)、心率(HR)和瞳孔直径的最佳截断点分别为>160 mmHg、<60次/分和>5 mm。库欣标准(SBP>160 mmHg且HR<60次/分)以及瞳孔反应和大小在检测ICP升高患者的能力方面具有互补性。固定散大瞳孔或库欣反应的特异性为93.2(88.2 - 96.6)%,阳性似然比(LR +)为5.4(2.9 - 10.2),而敏感性和阴性似然比(LR -)分别仅为36.8(26.7 - 47.8)%和0.7(0.6 - 0.8),曲线下面积(AUC)为0.65(0.57 - 0.73)。敏感性分析表明,最佳截断值和最终准确性取决于损伤模式。
ICP升高的传统临床体征可能会导致对患者进行院前高渗药物治疗的分诊不足。进一步的研究应在院前环境中确定更准确的临床体征或替代性非侵入性诊断辅助手段。