• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

建模 Wald 漂移率参数的跨试验变异性。

Modeling across-trial variability in the Wald drift rate parameter.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 15906, Amsterdam, 1001 NK, The Netherlands.

Department of Psychology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2021 Jun;53(3):1060-1076. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01448-7.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-020-01448-7
PMID:32948979
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8219596/
Abstract

The shifted-Wald model is a popular analysis tool for one-choice reaction-time tasks. In its simplest version, the shifted-Wald model assumes a constant trial-independent drift rate parameter. However, the presence of endogenous processes-fluctuation in attention and motivation, fatigue and boredom-suggest that drift rate might vary across experimental trials. Here we show how across-trial variability in drift rate can be accounted for by assuming a trial-specific drift rate parameter that is governed by a positive-valued distribution. We consider two candidate distributions: the truncated normal distribution and the gamma distribution. For the resulting distributions of first-arrival times, we derive analytical and sampling-based solutions, and implement the models in a Bayesian framework. Recovery studies and an application to a data set comprised of 1469 participants suggest that (1) both mixture distributions yield similar results; (2) all model parameters can be recovered accurately except for the drift variance parameter; (3) despite poor recovery, the presence of the drift variance parameter facilitates accurate recovery of the remaining parameters; (4) shift, threshold, and drift mean parameters are correlated.

摘要

转移 Wald 模型是一种用于单项反应时任务的流行分析工具。在其最简单的版本中,转移 Wald 模型假设了一个恒定的、与试验无关的漂移率参数。然而,内源性过程的存在——注意力和动机的波动、疲劳和厌倦——表明漂移率可能在实验试验中变化。在这里,我们展示了如何通过假设一个由正值分布控制的特定于试验的漂移率参数来解释漂移率的跨试验变异性。我们考虑了两个候选分布:截断正态分布和伽马分布。对于第一个到达时间的分布,我们推导出了分析和基于采样的解决方案,并在贝叶斯框架中实现了这些模型。恢复研究和对包含 1469 名参与者的数据集的应用表明:(1)两种混合分布都能得到相似的结果;(2)除了漂移方差参数外,所有模型参数都可以准确恢复;(3)尽管恢复效果不佳,但漂移方差参数的存在有助于准确恢复其余参数;(4)转换、阈值和漂移均值参数是相关的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ed6/8219596/5c43a4e8b38e/13428_2020_1448_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ed6/8219596/e2b189a1f77c/13428_2020_1448_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ed6/8219596/8eac57c20744/13428_2020_1448_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ed6/8219596/d941b4626a6f/13428_2020_1448_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ed6/8219596/ada645b0ea35/13428_2020_1448_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ed6/8219596/3313c62be9b1/13428_2020_1448_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ed6/8219596/c6baae54d8bc/13428_2020_1448_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ed6/8219596/9bfeb759d95b/13428_2020_1448_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ed6/8219596/bf1b27b039f8/13428_2020_1448_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ed6/8219596/49499f7f5236/13428_2020_1448_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ed6/8219596/2eaef6738690/13428_2020_1448_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ed6/8219596/80ca2da35b83/13428_2020_1448_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ed6/8219596/5c43a4e8b38e/13428_2020_1448_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ed6/8219596/e2b189a1f77c/13428_2020_1448_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ed6/8219596/8eac57c20744/13428_2020_1448_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ed6/8219596/d941b4626a6f/13428_2020_1448_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ed6/8219596/ada645b0ea35/13428_2020_1448_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ed6/8219596/3313c62be9b1/13428_2020_1448_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ed6/8219596/c6baae54d8bc/13428_2020_1448_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ed6/8219596/9bfeb759d95b/13428_2020_1448_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ed6/8219596/bf1b27b039f8/13428_2020_1448_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ed6/8219596/49499f7f5236/13428_2020_1448_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ed6/8219596/2eaef6738690/13428_2020_1448_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ed6/8219596/80ca2da35b83/13428_2020_1448_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ed6/8219596/5c43a4e8b38e/13428_2020_1448_Fig12_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Modeling across-trial variability in the Wald drift rate parameter.建模 Wald 漂移率参数的跨试验变异性。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Jun;53(3):1060-1076. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01448-7.
2
The drift diffusion model as the choice rule in inter-temporal and risky choice: A case study in medial orbitofrontal cortex lesion patients and controls.时际与风险选择中的漂移扩散模型作为选择规则:内侧眶额皮层损伤患者与对照的病例研究。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2020 Apr 20;16(4):e1007615. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007615. eCollection 2020 Apr.
3
Psychological interpretation of the ex-Gaussian and shifted Wald parameters: a diffusion model analysis.外伽马和 Wald 参数的心理解读:扩散模型分析。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Oct;16(5):798-817. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.5.798.
4
An extension of the shifted Wald model of human response times: Capturing the time dynamic properties of human cognition : Trial-varying Wald model.移位 Wald 人类反应时模型的扩展:捕获人类认知的时间动态特性:试验变化 Wald 模型。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Jun;31(3):1057-1077. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02418-8. Epub 2023 Dec 4.
5
How attention influences perceptual decision making: Single-trial EEG correlates of drift-diffusion model parameters.注意力如何影响感知决策:漂移扩散模型参数的单试次脑电图相关性
J Math Psychol. 2017 Feb;76(Pt B):117-130. doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2016.03.003. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
6
The drift diffusion model as the choice rule in reinforcement learning.强化学习中的选择规则——漂移扩散模型。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Aug;24(4):1234-1251. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1199-y.
7
On the Relation Between the (Censored) Shifted Wald and the Wiener Distribution as Measurement Models for Choice Response Times.关于(删失)移位沃尔德分布与维纳分布之间的关系作为选择反应时间的测量模型
Appl Psychol Meas. 2018 Mar;42(2):116-135. doi: 10.1177/0146621617710465. Epub 2017 May 30.
8
Bayesian and maximum likelihood estimation of hierarchical response time models.分层反应时间模型的贝叶斯估计和最大似然估计
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Dec;15(6):1209-17. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.6.1209.
9
Dopaminergic Modulation of Human Intertemporal Choice: A Diffusion Model Analysis Using the D2-Receptor Antagonist Haloperidol.多巴胺能调节人类跨期选择:使用 D2 受体拮抗剂氟哌啶醇的扩散模型分析。
J Neurosci. 2020 Oct 7;40(41):7936-7948. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0592-20.2020. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
10
A Bayesian Reformulation of the Extended Drift-Diffusion Model in Perceptual Decision Making.感知决策中扩展漂移扩散模型的贝叶斯重构
Front Comput Neurosci. 2017 May 11;11:29. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2017.00029. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Stratified distributional analysis-a novel perspective on RT distributions.分层分布分析——RT分布的新视角。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2025 Aug;78(8):1740-1756. doi: 10.1177/17470218241288516. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
2
An extension of the shifted Wald model of human response times: Capturing the time dynamic properties of human cognition : Trial-varying Wald model.移位 Wald 人类反应时模型的扩展:捕获人类认知的时间动态特性:试验变化 Wald 模型。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Jun;31(3):1057-1077. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02418-8. Epub 2023 Dec 4.
3
Analytic and holistic cognitive style as a set of independent manifests: Evidence from a validation study of six measurement instruments.

本文引用的文献

1
A tutorial on bridge sampling.桥抽样教程。
J Math Psychol. 2017 Dec;81:80-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2017.09.005.
2
The EZ diffusion model provides a powerful test of simple empirical effects.EZ扩散模型为简单的经验效应提供了一个有力的检验。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Apr;24(2):547-556. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1081-y.
3
Diffusion Decision Model: Current Issues and History.扩散决策模型:当前问题与历史
分析型和整体型认知风格作为一组独立的表现:来自六个测量工具的验证研究的证据。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 13;18(6):e0287057. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287057. eCollection 2023.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Apr;20(4):260-281. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.01.007. Epub 2016 Mar 5.
4
The shifted Wald distribution for response time data analysis.反应时间数据分析的移位 Wald 分布。
Psychol Methods. 2016 Sep;21(3):309-27. doi: 10.1037/met0000066. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
5
Sequential Sampling Models in Cognitive Neuroscience: Advantages, Applications, and Extensions.认知神经科学中的序贯抽样模型:优势、应用与扩展
Annu Rev Psychol. 2016;67:641-66. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033645. Epub 2015 Sep 17.
6
Factors influencing the latency of simple reaction time.影响简单反应时潜伏期的因素。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Mar 26;9:131. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00131. eCollection 2015.
7
On the ability to inhibit thought and action: general and special theories of an act of control.关于抑制思维和行动的能力:控制行为的一般和特殊理论。
Psychol Rev. 2014 Jan;121(1):66-95. doi: 10.1037/a0035230.
8
Modeling simple driving tasks with a one-boundary diffusion model.用单边界扩散模型对简单驾驶任务进行建模。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Jun;21(3):577-89. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0541-x.
9
Extending JAGS: a tutorial on adding custom distributions to JAGS (with a diffusion model example).扩展 JAGS:向 JAGS 添加自定义分布的教程(以扩散模型为例)。
Behav Res Methods. 2014 Mar;46(1):15-28. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0369-3.
10
A model for transit time distributions through organs that accounts for fractal heterogeneity.一种能够描述器官中迂回流经时间分布的模型,该模型考虑了分形异质性。
J Theor Biol. 2012 May 21;301:57-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.02.005.