Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Danish Epilepsy Center, Dianalund and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Epilepsia. 2020 Sep;61(9):e124-e128. doi: 10.1111/epi.16655. Epub 2020 Sep 19.
Our goal was to assess the interrater agreement (IRA) of photoparoxysmal response (PPR) using the classification proposed by a task force of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE), and a simplified classification system proposed by our group. In addition, we evaluated IRA of epileptiform discharges (EDs) and the diagnostic significance of the electroencephalographic (EEG) abnormalities. We used EEG recordings from the European Reference Network (EpiCARE) and Standardized Computer-based Organized Reporting of EEG (SCORE). Six raters independently scored EEG recordings from 30 patients. We calculated the agreement coefficient (AC) for each feature. IRA of PPR using the classification proposed by the ILAE task force was only fair (AC = 0.38). This improved to a moderate agreement by using the simplified classification (AC = 0.56; P = .004). IRA of EDs was almost perfect (AC = 0.98), and IRA of scoring the diagnostic significance was moderate (AC = 0.51). Our results suggest that the simplified classification of the PPR is suitable for implementation in clinical practice.
我们的目的是评估使用国际抗癫痫联盟(ILAE)工作组提出的分类法和我们小组提出的简化分类系统来评估光惊觉反应(PPR)的组间一致性(IRA)。此外,我们还评估了癫痫样放电(EDs)的 IRA 和脑电图(EEG)异常的诊断意义。我们使用欧洲参考网络(EpiCARE)和基于标准化计算机的 EEG 有组织报告(SCORE)的 EEG 记录。六位评估者独立对 30 名患者的 EEG 记录进行评分。我们计算了每个特征的一致性系数(AC)。使用 ILAE 工作组提出的分类法评估的 PPR 的 IRA 仅为中等(AC=0.38)。通过使用简化分类法,这一结果提高到了中度一致性(AC=0.56;P=0.004)。EDs 的 IRA 几乎是完美的(AC=0.98),而对诊断意义评分的 IRA 则为中度(AC=0.51)。我们的结果表明,PPR 的简化分类适用于临床实践。