Scheinberg Phillip
Division of Hematology, Hospital A Beneficência Portuguesa, São Paulo, Brazil.
F1000Res. 2020 Sep 10;9. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.22214.1. eCollection 2020.
Aplastic anemia (AA) in its severe form has historically been associated with high mortality. With limited supportive care and no effective strategy to reverse marrow failure, most patients diagnosed with severe AA (SAA) died of pancytopenia complications. Since the 1970s, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and immunosuppressive therapy (IST) have changed SAA's natural history by improving marrow function and pancytopenia. Standard IST with horse anti-thymocyte globulin plus cyclosporine produces a hematologic response rate of 60 to 70%. In the long term, about one-third of patients relapse, and 10 to 15% can develop cytogenetic abnormalities. Outcomes with either HSCT or IST are similar, and choosing between these modalities relies on age, availability of a histocompatible donor, comorbidities, and patient preference. The introduction of eltrombopag, a thrombopoietin receptor agonist, improved SAA outcomes as both salvage (second-line) and upfront therapy combined with IST. As a single agent, eltrombopag in doses up to 150 mg daily improved cytopenias in 40 to 50% in those who failed initial IST, which associated with higher marrow cellularity, suggesting a pan-stimulatory marrow effect. When eltrombopag was combined with IST as upfront therapy, overall (about 90%) and complete responses (about 50%) were higher than observed extensively with IST alone of 65% and 10%, respectively. Not surprisingly, given the strong correlation between hematologic response rates and survival in SAA, most (>90%) were alive after a median follow-up of 18 months. Longer follow-up and real-word data continue to confirm the activity of this agent in AA. The use of eltrombopag in different combinations and doses are currently being explored. The activity of another thrombopoietin receptor agonist in AA, romiplostim, suggests a class effect. In the coming years, the mechanisms of their activity and the most optimal regimen are likely to be elucidated.
重型再生障碍性贫血(AA)在历史上一直与高死亡率相关。由于支持治疗有限且缺乏逆转骨髓衰竭的有效策略,大多数诊断为重型AA(SAA)的患者死于全血细胞减少并发症。自20世纪70年代以来,造血干细胞移植(HSCT)和免疫抑制治疗(IST)通过改善骨髓功能和全血细胞减少改变了SAA的自然病程。标准的IST方案是马抗胸腺细胞球蛋白加环孢素,其血液学缓解率为60%至70%。从长期来看,约三分之一的患者会复发,10%至15%的患者会出现细胞遗传学异常。HSCT或IST的治疗效果相似,在这两种治疗方式之间进行选择取决于年龄、组织相容性供体的可用性、合并症以及患者的偏好。血小板生成素受体激动剂艾曲泊帕的引入改善了SAA的治疗效果,无论是作为挽救(二线)治疗还是与IST联合的一线治疗。作为单一药物,每日剂量高达150 mg的艾曲泊帕可使初始IST治疗失败的患者中40%至50%的血细胞减少得到改善,这与更高的骨髓细胞密度相关,提示其具有泛刺激骨髓的作用。当艾曲泊帕与IST联合作为一线治疗时,总体缓解率(约90%)和完全缓解率(约50%)高于单独使用IST时广泛观察到的65%和10%。不出所料,鉴于血液学缓解率与SAA患者生存率之间的密切相关性,在中位随访18个月后,大多数(>90%)患者存活。更长时间的随访和真实世界数据继续证实了该药物在AA中的活性。目前正在探索艾曲泊帕的不同联合用药和剂量。另一种血小板生成素受体激动剂罗米司亭在AA中的活性表明存在类效应。在未来几年,它们的活性机制和最优化方案可能会得到阐明。