Bousquet Kathryn, Swaab Tamara Y, Long Debra L
University of California, Davis.
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2020;35(1):43-57. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2019.1622750. Epub 2019 May 27.
Verb bias facilitates parsing of temporarily ambiguous sentences, but it is unclear when and how comprehenders use probabilistic knowledge about the combinatorial properties of verbs in context. In a self-paced reading experiment, participants read direct object/sentential complement sentences. Reading time in the critical region was investigated as a function of three forms of bias: structural bias (the frequency with which a verb appears in direct object/sentential complement sentences), lexical bias (the simple co-occurrence of verbs and other lexical items), and global bias (obtained from norming data about the use of verbs with specific noun phrases). For reading times at the critical word, structural bias was the only reliable predictor. However, global bias was superior to structural and lexical bias at the post-critical word and for offline acceptability ratings. The results suggest that structural information about verbs is available immediately, but that context-specific, semantic information becomes increasingly informative as processing proceeds.
动词偏向有助于对临时歧义句进行句法分析,但目前尚不清楚理解者何时以及如何在语境中运用关于动词组合特性的概率性知识。在一项自定步速阅读实验中,参与者阅读直接宾语/句子补足语句子。关键区域的阅读时间被作为三种偏向形式的函数进行研究:结构偏向(动词出现在直接宾语/句子补足语句子中的频率)、词汇偏向(动词与其他词汇项的简单共现)和全局偏向(从关于动词与特定名词短语搭配使用的规范数据中获得)。对于关键单词的阅读时间,结构偏向是唯一可靠的预测指标。然而,在关键单词之后以及离线可接受性评级方面,全局偏向优于结构偏向和词汇偏向。结果表明,关于动词的结构信息可立即获取,但随着加工的进行,特定语境的语义信息变得越来越有信息量。