Culhane Jessica, Sharma Monisha, Wilson Kate, Roberts D Allen, Mugo Cyrus, Wamalwa Dalton, Inwani Irene, Barnabas Ruanne V, Kohler Pamela K
Department of Epidemiology,University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Health Sciences Bldg, Box 357236, Seattle, WA, United States.
University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Jul 16;25:100453. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100453. eCollection 2020 Aug.
Despite high efficacy of oral antiretroviral therapy (ART), viral suppression among adolescents and young adults (AYA) living with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) remains low. Compared to daily oral ART, bimonthly long-acting injectable ART (LA-ART) may simplify adherence, improve clinical outcomes, and decrease HIV transmission in this priority population. However, LA-ART will likely cost more than oral ART and the cost threshold at which LA-ART will be cost effective in SSA has not been evaluated.
We adapted a mathematical model of HIV transmission and progression in Kenya to include HIV acquisition and viral suppression among AYA (age 10-24). We projected the population-level health and economic impact of providing LA-ART to AYA over a 10-year time horizon assuming oral ART costs of US$233 annually and a two-month duration of viral suppression per LA-ART injection. We calculated the maximum cost at which switching from oral to LA-ART would be considered cost-effective, using thresholds of $500 and $1,508 per disability-adjusted life year averted (WHO's threshold of HIV treatment interventions and Kenya's gross domestic product per capita).
Assuming 85% of AYA switch from oral to injectable formulations, LA-ART is estimated to prevent 40,540 infections and 20,480 deaths over 10 years. The maximum increase in the annual per-person cost of receiving LA-ART is estimated to be $89 and $236 for LA-ART to be cost-effective under the thresholds of $500 and $1,508 per DALY averted, respectively. The cost threshold was lower when non-adherent oral ART AYA users were assumed to be less likely to switch to LA-ART.
Providing LA-ART to AYA can be cost-effective in Kenya if it is less than twice the cost of oral ART. Long-acting injectable ART for priority populations with low viral suppression has the potential to cost-effectively avert disability and death.
National Institutes of Health (R01 HD085807; PI: Kohler).
尽管口服抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)疗效显著,但撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)地区感染艾滋病毒的青少年和青年(AYA)的病毒抑制率仍然很低。与每日口服ART相比,每两个月一次的长效注射用ART(LA-ART)可能会简化依从性,改善临床结果,并减少这一重点人群中的艾滋病毒传播。然而,LA-ART的成本可能会高于口服ART,且尚未评估LA-ART在SSA具有成本效益的成本阈值。
我们对肯尼亚艾滋病毒传播和进展的数学模型进行了调整,以纳入AYA(10至24岁)中的艾滋病毒感染和病毒抑制情况。我们假设口服ART的年成本为233美元,且每次LA-ART注射可实现两个月的病毒抑制,在此基础上预测了在10年时间内为AYA提供LA-ART对人群健康和经济的影响。我们使用每避免一个残疾调整生命年500美元和1508美元的阈值(世卫组织艾滋病毒治疗干预措施的阈值和肯尼亚人均国内生产总值),计算了从口服ART转换为LA-ART被认为具有成本效益的最高成本。
假设85%的AYA从口服制剂转换为注射制剂,预计LA-ART在10年内可预防40540例感染和20480例死亡。在每避免一个残疾调整生命年分别为500美元和1508美元的阈值下,接受LA-ART的人均年成本的最大增幅估计分别为89美元和236美元时,LA-ART才具有成本效益。当假设不依从口服ART的AYA使用者转换为LA-ART的可能性较小时,成本阈值较低。
如果LA-ART的成本低于口服ART成本的两倍,那么在肯尼亚为AYA提供LA-ART可能具有成本效益。为病毒抑制率低的重点人群提供长效注射用ART有潜力以具有成本效益的方式避免残疾和死亡。
美国国立卫生研究院(R01 HD085807;项目负责人:科勒)