Su Yi-Han, Peng Bou-Yue, Wang Peter-D, Feng Sheng-Wei
School of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Division of Prosthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
School of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020 Oct;110:103899. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103899. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
Achievement of adequate implant stability is one of the determinants for long-term successful osseointegration. Resonance frequency analysis was developed to monitor implant stability and is now a well-recognized, non-invasive tool for determining the appropriate time for functional loading. However, there have been few studies with continuous evaluation and comparison of implant stability and marginal bone level changes between two different macro designs and clinical situations during the implant healing process. Thus, the purpose of this clinical trial is to evaluate the implant stability and marginal bone level changes of straight and conical implants during the implant healing process. In this prospective clinical trial, 25 participants were randomized to either straight or conical implants. A total of 32 titanium dental implants with a length of 9 mm or 11 mm were installed in the maxilla and the mandible according to the manufacturer's instructions. A resonance frequency analyzer was used to measure the implant stability quotient (ISQ) at the time of implant placement and after 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, 10 weeks, and 12 weeks of healing. The changes in the peri-implant marginal bone level were evaluated from digital radiographic films taken at the time of implant placement and after 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks of healing. The preliminary results of this study revealed higher ISQ values and better healing tendency for conical implants in comparison with straight implants in the maxilla. Similar ISQ values and healing tendency were observed for straight and conical implants in the mandible. No significant differences in marginal bone loss were found between the straight and conical implants. However, in the mandible, slightly more marginal bone loss was found with the conical implants than straight implants after 12 weeks of healing. In conclusion, ISQ healing tendency and marginal bone loss are influenced by implant macro-design and jaw regions. Straight implants revealed similar ISQ healing tendency and marginal bone loss in both the mandible and maxilla. Conical implants were confirmed more beneficial for maintenance of implant stability and marginal bone level in the maxilla.
实现足够的种植体稳定性是长期成功骨整合的决定因素之一。共振频率分析技术被开发用于监测种植体稳定性,如今它已成为一种公认的、用于确定功能加载合适时间的非侵入性工具。然而,在种植体愈合过程中,很少有研究对两种不同宏观设计和临床情况的种植体稳定性及边缘骨水平变化进行持续评估和比较。因此,本临床试验的目的是评估直形和锥形种植体在愈合过程中的种植体稳定性及边缘骨水平变化。在这项前瞻性临床试验中,25名参与者被随机分配接受直形或锥形种植体。根据制造商的说明,在上颌和下颌共植入了32颗长度为9毫米或11毫米的钛牙种植体。使用共振频率分析仪在种植体植入时以及愈合2周、4周、6周、8周、10周和12周后测量种植体稳定性商数(ISQ)。从种植体植入时以及愈合4周、8周和12周时拍摄的数字化X光片中评估种植体周围边缘骨水平的变化。本研究的初步结果显示,与上颌的直形种植体相比,锥形种植体的ISQ值更高,愈合趋势更好。在下颌中,直形和锥形种植体的ISQ值及愈合趋势相似。直形和锥形种植体之间在边缘骨丢失方面未发现显著差异。然而,在下颌中,愈合12周后,锥形种植体的边缘骨丢失略多于直形种植体。总之,ISQ愈合趋势和边缘骨丢失受种植体宏观设计和颌骨区域的影响。直形种植体在下颌和上颌中显示出相似的ISQ愈合趋势和边缘骨丢失。锥形种植体被证实对上颌种植体稳定性和边缘骨水平的维持更有益。