Lockyer Jannine M, Oliva Jessica L
School of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, 3800 Melbourne, Australia.
Animals (Basel). 2020 Sep 17;10(9):1679. doi: 10.3390/ani10091679.
Important physiological, performance, and relationship differences have been reported between companion and working dogs. This study aimed to investigate how human attachment styles manifest towards dogs, depending on the dog's role. Seeing Eye Dog (SED) carer ( = 25) and Companion Dog Owner (CDO) ( = 78) avoidant and anxious attachment scores towards the dog in their care were compared. Feelings and motivations about being a SED carer or CDO were also investigated qualitatively. Significant differences were observed between pet avoidance, with avoidance scores significantly predicting SED carer group membership. Qualitative insights revealed more human prosocial motivations for becoming a SED carer, and more dog-related motivations for becoming a CDO, with CDOs more likely to consider their dog a 'significant other'. This study corroborates findings supporting differences in human-dog relationships for working versus companion dogs. The potential impacts of human-dog attachment should be considered for SED success.
据报道,伴侣犬和工作犬在重要的生理、行为表现及关系方面存在差异。本研究旨在调查人类依恋风格如何因犬的角色不同而表现出差异。比较了导盲犬(SED)护理员(n = 25)和伴侣犬主人(CDO)(n = 78)对其照料犬的回避型和焦虑型依恋得分。还对成为导盲犬护理员或伴侣犬主人的感受和动机进行了定性研究。在宠物回避方面观察到显著差异,回避得分显著预测了导盲犬护理员组的成员身份。定性分析表明,成为导盲犬护理员更多是出于人类的亲社会动机,而成为伴侣犬主人则更多是出于与犬相关的动机,伴侣犬主人更有可能将他们的犬视为“重要他人”。本研究证实了支持工作犬与伴侣犬在人犬关系上存在差异的研究结果。为了导盲犬工作的成功,应考虑人犬依恋的潜在影响。