• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以生活经验研究为资源的康复:一项混合方法研究。

Lived experience research as a resource for recovery: a mixed methods study.

机构信息

School of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Black Dog Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 21;20(1):456. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02861-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12888-020-02861-0
PMID:32958045
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7507671/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lived experience research is conducted by people who have experience of mental health issues and is therefore better placed than more traditional research to illuminate participants' experiences. Findings that focus on identifying enablers of recovery from a lived experience perspective have the potential to assist people in their recovery process. However, this lived experience research is often difficult to find, access and interpret. We co-produced user-friendly and engaging resources to disseminate findings from six lived experience research studies. This paper seeks to answer the research questions: a) Did exposure to lived experience research increase hopefulness for participants?; and b) How else did interacting with lived experience research resources influence participants' lives?

METHODS

Thirty-eight participants were introduced to four resources of their choosing by peer workers over a four-week period. The helpfulness of resources was evaluated using mixed methods, including a quasi-experimental analysis of change in hope, an anonymous survey and in-depth interviews.

RESULTS

Findings indicated that the resources promoted hope, but that increases in hopefulness may not be seen immediately. Other impacts include that the resources: encouraged helpful activities; provided a positive experience; increased valued knowledge; encouraged people to reflect on their journey and think constructively about mental health issues; helped people to feel less alone; and assisted people to explain their situation to others.

CONCLUSIONS

The research suggests the potential usefulness of lived experience research resources, presented in user-friendly formats, in the lives of people who experience mental health issues and implies a need to nurture this type of research.

摘要

背景

生活经验研究由有心理健康问题经验的人进行,因此比更传统的研究更能阐明参与者的经验。从生活经验的角度出发,关注发现恢复的促进因素的研究结果有可能帮助人们在康复过程中取得进展。然而,这种生活经验研究往往很难找到、获取和解释。我们共同制作了易于使用且引人入胜的资源,以传播六项生活经验研究的研究结果。本文旨在回答以下研究问题:a)接触生活经验研究是否会增加参与者的希望感?;b)与生活经验研究资源互动如何影响参与者的生活?

方法

在四周的时间里,同伴工作人员向 38 名参与者介绍了他们选择的四种资源。使用混合方法评估资源的有用性,包括希望感变化的准实验分析、匿名调查和深入访谈。

结果

研究结果表明,这些资源促进了希望感,但增加希望感可能不会立即显现。其他影响包括:资源鼓励有益的活动;提供积极的体验;增加有价值的知识;鼓励人们反思自己的旅程,对心理健康问题进行建设性思考;帮助人们感到不那么孤独;并帮助人们向他人解释自己的情况。

结论

研究表明,以用户友好的格式呈现的生活经验研究资源在有心理健康问题的人的生活中可能具有潜在的用途,并暗示需要培养这种类型的研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e91/7507671/38740befa467/12888_2020_2861_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e91/7507671/6bd87d305106/12888_2020_2861_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e91/7507671/af437339eb17/12888_2020_2861_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e91/7507671/20a4eada9d67/12888_2020_2861_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e91/7507671/38740befa467/12888_2020_2861_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e91/7507671/6bd87d305106/12888_2020_2861_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e91/7507671/af437339eb17/12888_2020_2861_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e91/7507671/20a4eada9d67/12888_2020_2861_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e91/7507671/38740befa467/12888_2020_2861_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Lived experience research as a resource for recovery: a mixed methods study.以生活经验研究为资源的康复:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 21;20(1):456. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02861-0.
2
Mental Health Peer Worker Perspectives on Resources Developed from Lived Experience Research Findings: A Delphi Study.心理健康同伴工作者对从生活经验研究结果中开发的资源的看法:德尔菲研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 24;19(7):3881. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073881.
3
Making Lived-Experience Research Accessible: A Design Thinking Approach to Co-Creating Knowledge Translation Resources Based on Evidence.让生活体验研究变得易于理解:一种基于证据的共同创造知识转化资源的设计思维方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 2;18(17):9250. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179250.
4
Recovery After Psychosis: Qualitative Study of Service User Experiences of Lived Experience Videos on a Recovery-Oriented Website.精神病康复后:对以康复为导向的网站上服务使用者观看生活经历视频体验的定性研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2018 May 8;5(2):e37. doi: 10.2196/mental.9934.
5
6
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
7
Co-design and evaluation of a multidisciplinary teaching resource on mental health recovery involving people with lived experience.多学科心理健康康复教学资源的共同设计与评估,涉及有过切身体验的人群。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2023 Jun;70(3):354-365. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12859. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
8
Co-producing principles to guide health research: an illustrative case study from an eating disorder research clinic.共同制定指导健康研究的原则:来自一家饮食失调研究诊所的实例研究
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Sep 20;9(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00460-3.
9
Workplace experiences of mental health consumer peer workers in New South Wales, Australia: a survey study exploring job satisfaction, burnout and turnover intention.澳大利亚新南威尔士州心理健康消费者同行工作者的工作场所体验:一项调查研究,旨在探讨工作满意度、倦怠和离职意向。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 1;20(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02688-9.
10
Housing and Support Narratives of People Experiencing Mental Health Issues: Making My Place, My Home.有心理健康问题者的住房与支持经历:打造我的空间,我的家。
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jan 10;10:939. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00939. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers and facilitators to treatment in severe and enduring eating disorders: a mixed-methods study of access, engagement, and lived experience.严重及持续性饮食失调症治疗的障碍与促进因素:一项关于获得治疗、参与治疗及实际体验的混合方法研究
J Eat Disord. 2025 Sep 12;13(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s40337-025-01393-w.
2
Needs and experiences of families after a sudden unexplained death in childhood: a qualitative study.儿童期不明原因猝死家庭的需求与经历:一项定性研究
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2025 Aug 24;9(1):e003812. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2025-003812.
3
Lived experiences and coping strategies of people living with Glaucoma in Nigeria: A qualitative study.

本文引用的文献

1
Igniting and Maintaining Hope: The Voices of People Living with Mental Illness.点燃并维持希望:精神疾病患者的心声。
Community Ment Health J. 2020 Aug;56(6):1044-1052. doi: 10.1007/s10597-020-00557-z. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
2
Self-management interventions for people with severe mental illness: systematic review and meta-analysis.严重精神疾病患者的自我管理干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Psychiatry. 2019 May;214(5):260-268. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2019.54. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
3
Lived experience researchers partnering with consumers and carers to improve mental health research: Reflections from an Australian initiative.
尼日利亚青光眼患者的生活经历与应对策略:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 16;20(6):e0325258. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325258. eCollection 2025.
4
'Wisdom Is Knowledge Plus Experience': Qualitative Study of Lived Experience and Researcher Perspectives on Suicide Research Co-Production.“智慧即知识加经验”:关于自杀研究共同生产的生活经历与研究者观点的定性研究
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2025 Feb;34(1):e13507. doi: 10.1111/inm.13507.
5
Revisiting Social Stigma in Non-suicidal Self-injury: A Narrative Review.重新审视非自杀性自伤中的社会污名:一项叙事综述。
Consort Psychiatr. 2022 Sep 30;3(3):6-18. doi: 10.17816/CP196. eCollection 2022.
6
Exploring the lived experience of receiving mental health crisis care at emergency departments, crisis phone lines and crisis care alternatives.探索在急诊部门、危机热线和危机护理替代方案中接受心理健康危机护理的真实体验。
Health Expect. 2024 Apr;27(2):e14045. doi: 10.1111/hex.14045.
7
Lived experiences of South African rehabilitation practitioners during coronavirus disease 2019.2019年冠状病毒病期间南非康复从业者的生活经历
Afr J Disabil. 2024 Jan 12;13:1229. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v13i0.1229. eCollection 2024.
8
Exploring the impact of engagement in mental health and substance use research: A scoping review and thematic analysis.探索参与精神健康和物质使用研究的影响:范围综述和主题分析。
Health Expect. 2023 Oct;26(5):1806-1819. doi: 10.1111/hex.13779. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
9
Research evidence and implementation gaps in the engagement of people with lived experience in mental health and substance use research: a scoping review.有过精神健康和物质使用经历的人群参与心理健康和物质使用研究的研究证据与实施差距:一项范围综述
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 May 11;9(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00442-5.
10
Beyond heroism: a qualitative study on the lived experiences of nurses caring for patients with COVID-19 in Pakistan.超越英雄主义:关于巴基斯坦护理新冠肺炎患者的护士亲身经历的定性研究
BMC Nurs. 2023 Apr 6;22(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01279-9.
与消费者和护理人员合作的生活体验研究人员改善精神健康研究:来自澳大利亚的一项倡议的反思。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Aug;27(4):1219-1229. doi: 10.1111/inm.12482. Epub 2018 May 30.
4
Mental Health Consumer Experiences and Strategies When Seeking Physical Health Care: A Focus Group Study.寻求身体健康护理时的心理健康消费者体验与策略:一项焦点小组研究
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2016 Mar 3;3:2333393616631679. doi: 10.1177/2333393616631679. eCollection 2016 Jan-Dec.
5
The Recovery Movement: Implications For Mental Health Care And Enabling People To Participate Fully In Life.康复运动:对精神卫生保健的影响以及使人们能够充分参与生活
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Jun 1;35(6):1091-7. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0153.
6
Coping with mental health issues: subjective experiences of self-help and helpful contextual factors at the start of mental health treatment.应对心理健康问题:心理健康治疗开始时自助的主观体验及有益的情境因素
J Ment Health. 2016;25(1):23-7. doi: 10.3109/09638237.2015.1078883. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
7
Conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: systematic review and narrative synthesis.心理健康中个人康复的概念框架:系统评价和叙述性综合。
Br J Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;199(6):445-52. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.110.083733.
8
Hope as a determinant of mental health recovery: a psychometric evaluation of the Herth Hope Index-Dutch version.希望作为心理健康恢复的一个决定因素:赫思希望指数荷兰语版的心理测量评估
Scand J Caring Sci. 2010 Dec;24 Suppl 1:67-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2009.00758.x.
9
A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of a modified recovery workbook program: preliminary findings.一项关于改良康复工作手册计划有效性的随机对照试验:初步研究结果。
Psychiatr Serv. 2009 Apr;60(4):491-7. doi: 10.1176/ps.2009.60.4.491.
10
Improving acute psychiatric hospital services according to inpatient experiences. A user-led piece of research as a means to empowerment.根据住院患者体验改善急性精神病医院服务。一项由用户主导的研究,作为赋权的一种方式。
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2009 Jan;30(1):31-8. doi: 10.1080/01612840802500733.