• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

政府资助的家庭适应性改造计划的经济评估框架:一种定量方法。

An Economic Evaluation Framework for Government-Funded Home Adaptation Schemes: A Quantitative Approach.

作者信息

Zhang Bo, Zhou Peng

机构信息

School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China.

Cardiff Business School, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3EU, UK.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Sep 18;8(3):345. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8030345.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare8030345
PMID:32961870
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7551430/
Abstract

The ability to live independently plays a crucial role in the mental and psychological wellbeing of the disabled. To achieve this goal, most governments spend a substantial budget on home adaptation projects. It has been observed that schemes with different target clients (residents versus landlords) are different in efficiency and effectiveness. To understand why and how these schemes differ in performance, this paper develops and applies a generic economic evaluation framework for government-funded home adaptation schemes. Based on the individual-level surveys collected in the United Kingdom, an empirical model was formulated to quantify the determinants for various performance indicators, including money costs, time costs and client satisfaction. Robust estimation procedures were applied to deal with the heteroscedasticity and outlier problems in the data. Results showed that a specialized independent living scheme dedicated to disability adaptations (e.g., the Physical Adaptations Grant, PAG) had higher efficiency and effectiveness than general-purpose schemes (e.g., the Disabled Facilities Grant, DFG), because the funds were provided to the landlords who had a stronger motivation to minimize the time cost in the short run and maximize the future rent potential in the long run. A "unified system" approach to adaptations should be a guiding principle for policy development, regardless of who actually delivers the service.

摘要

独立生活能力对残疾人的精神和心理健康至关重要。为实现这一目标,大多数政府在家庭改造项目上投入了大量预算。据观察,针对不同目标客户(居民与房东)的计划在效率和效果上存在差异。为了解这些计划为何以及如何在绩效上有所不同,本文为政府资助的家庭改造计划开发并应用了一个通用的经济评估框架。基于在英国收集的个人层面调查数据,构建了一个实证模型来量化各种绩效指标的决定因素,包括资金成本、时间成本和客户满意度。应用稳健估计程序来处理数据中的异方差和异常值问题。结果表明,专门致力于残疾适应的独立生活计划(例如身体适应补助金,PAG)比通用计划(例如残疾设施补助金,DFG)具有更高的效率和效果,因为资金提供给了房东,他们在短期内有更强的动力将时间成本降至最低,在长期内有更强的动力使未来租金潜力最大化。无论实际提供服务的是谁,采用“统一系统”的改造方法都应成为政策制定的指导原则。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bd6/7551430/728fbad3607b/healthcare-08-00345-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bd6/7551430/9d777ecc1b3e/healthcare-08-00345-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bd6/7551430/dbedf0fd65dd/healthcare-08-00345-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bd6/7551430/0684bdec9f2e/healthcare-08-00345-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bd6/7551430/728fbad3607b/healthcare-08-00345-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bd6/7551430/9d777ecc1b3e/healthcare-08-00345-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bd6/7551430/dbedf0fd65dd/healthcare-08-00345-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bd6/7551430/0684bdec9f2e/healthcare-08-00345-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bd6/7551430/728fbad3607b/healthcare-08-00345-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
An Economic Evaluation Framework for Government-Funded Home Adaptation Schemes: A Quantitative Approach.政府资助的家庭适应性改造计划的经济评估框架:一种定量方法。
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Sep 18;8(3):345. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8030345.
2
Costs and economic consequences of a help-at-home scheme for older people in England.
Health Soc Care Community. 2017 Mar;25(2):780-789. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12372. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
3
The critical role of community-based micro-grants for disability aids and equipment: results from a needs analysis.基于社区的小额赠款在残疾辅助器具和设备方面的关键作用:需求分析结果
Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(9):858-64. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1065011. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
4
Tuberculosis结核病
5
[Old and new long stay patients in French psychiatric institutions: results from a national random survey with two-year follow-up].[法国精神病院的新老长期住院患者:一项为期两年随访的全国随机调查结果]
Encephale. 2005 Jul-Aug;31(4 Pt 1):466-76. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(05)82408-x.
6
Meeting the needs of parents around the time of diagnosis of disability among their children: evaluation of a novel program for information, support, and liaison by key workers.在孩子被诊断为残疾前后满足家长的需求:对一项由关键工作者提供信息、支持和联络的新项目的评估。
Pediatrics. 2004 Oct;114(4):e477-82. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0240.
7
8
Cost-Effectiveness and Affordability of Interventions, Policies, and Platforms for the Prevention and Treatment of Mental, Neurological, and Substance Use Disorders预防和治疗精神、神经及物质使用障碍的干预措施、政策和平台的成本效益及可负担性
9
Is it worth protecting groundwater from diffuse pollution with agri-environmental schemes? A hydro-economic modeling approach.是否值得通过农业环境计划来保护地下水免受扩散污染?一种水经济建模方法。
J Environ Manage. 2013 Oct 15;128:62-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.04.058. Epub 2013 May 28.
10
Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of day care for people with severe mental disorders: (1) acute day hospital versus admission; (2) vocational rehabilitation; (3) day hospital versus outpatient care.针对重度精神障碍患者日间护理效果的系统评价:(1)急性日间医院与住院治疗对比;(2)职业康复;(3)日间医院与门诊护理对比。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(21):1-75. doi: 10.3310/hta5210.

引用本文的文献

1
High-Performance Work Systems, Thriving at Work, and Job Burnout among Nurses in Chinese Public Hospitals: The Role of Resilience at Work.中国公立医院护士的高绩效工作系统、工作幸福感与职业倦怠:工作复原力的作用
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Oct 2;10(10):1935. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10101935.
2
Valuing home modifications: The street-level policy work of occupational therapists in Australian home modification practice.重视家居改造:澳大利亚家居改造实践中作业治疗师的基层政策工作。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2023 Feb;70(1):61-72. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12836. Epub 2022 Aug 22.

本文引用的文献

1
External validation of the recurrent falls risk scale in community-dwelling stroke individuals.社区居住的中风个体中复发性跌倒风险量表的外部验证。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Sep;29(9):104985. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104985. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
2
Health Opportunity Costs: Assessing the Implications of Uncertainty Using Elicitation Methods with Experts.健康机会成本:运用向专家请教的方法评估不确定性的影响。
Med Decis Making. 2020 May;40(4):448-459. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20916450. Epub 2020 May 22.
3
Factors predicting older Adults' attitudes toward and intentions to use stair mobility assistive designs at home.
预测老年人对家庭楼梯移动辅助设计的态度及使用意愿的因素。
Prev Med Rep. 2020 Mar 16;18:101082. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101082. eCollection 2020 Jun.
4
Living Alone Among Older Adults in Canada and the U.S.加拿大和美国老年人中的独居情况
Healthcare (Basel). 2019 May 7;7(2):68. doi: 10.3390/healthcare7020068.
5
Making Homes More Dementia-Friendly through the Use of Aids and Adaptations.通过使用辅助器具和适应性改造让家庭对痴呆症患者更友好。
Healthcare (Basel). 2019 Mar 16;7(1):43. doi: 10.3390/healthcare7010043.
6
Health-Related Quality of Life among People Applying for Housing Adaptations: Associated Factors.申请住房改造人群的健康相关生活质量:相关因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Sep 27;15(10):2130. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102130.
7
Clients' Perspectives of the Effectiveness of Home Modification Recommendations by Occupational Therapists.客户对职业治疗师提出的家庭改造建议有效性的看法。
Occup Ther Health Care. 2018 Jul;32(3):230-250. doi: 10.1080/07380577.2018.1491085. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
8
Falls and Fear of Falling among Persons Who Receive Housing Adaptations-Results from a Quasi-Experimental Study in Sweden.接受住房改造者的跌倒与跌倒恐惧——瑞典一项准实验研究的结果
Healthcare (Basel). 2017 Sep 29;5(4):66. doi: 10.3390/healthcare5040066.
9
Risk Factors for Falls in Community Stroke Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.社区脑卒中幸存者跌倒的危险因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Mar;99(3):563-573.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.06.032. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
10
Using Cost-Effectiveness Analysis to Address Health Equity Concerns.运用成本效益分析解决健康公平问题。
Value Health. 2017 Feb;20(2):206-212. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.11.027.