Hoffmann S, Henrichsen J
Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B. 1987 Apr;95(2):89-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1987.tb03093.x.
In 11 general practice offices, with a total of 29 general practitioners, throat swabs from 468 patients with acute pharyngotonsillitis were assayed for group A streptococci with a commercial antigen detection test kit (Culturette Brand Ten-Minute Group A Strep ID; Marion Scientific, Div. of Marion Laboratories, Inc., Kansas City, MO 64114, USA). Compared to aerobic cultures carried out in our laboratory, the sensitivity of the antigen detection test was 73%; the specificity, 98%; the positive predictive value, 96%; the negative predictive value, 84%; and the overall agreement with laboratory findings, 88%. The prevalence of group A streptococci was 42%. Tests performed by assistants were significantly less sensitive (52%) than tests carried out by the physicians themselves (77%). The sensitivity of office cultures was 83% for blood agar plates supplemented with bacitracin discs, and 77% for Streptocult. We conclude that antigen detection tests should not presently be substituted for office cultures in the diagnosis of group A streptococcal throat infections.
在11个全科医疗诊所(共有29名全科医生),使用一种商用抗原检测试剂盒(Culturette品牌十分钟A组链球菌鉴定试剂盒;马里恩科学公司,马里恩实验室公司旗下部门,美国密苏里州堪萨斯城64114)对468例急性咽扁桃体炎患者的咽拭子进行A组链球菌检测。与我们实验室进行的需氧培养相比,抗原检测试验的敏感性为73%;特异性为98%;阳性预测值为96%;阴性预测值为84%;与实验室结果的总体一致性为88%。A组链球菌的患病率为42%。由助理进行的检测敏感性(52%)显著低于医生本人进行的检测(77%)。对于补充了杆菌肽纸片的血琼脂平板,诊所培养的敏感性为83%,对于链球菌培养基为77%。我们得出结论,目前在诊断A组链球菌性咽喉感染时,抗原检测试验不应替代诊所培养。