• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对加西亚和万纳《性别不平等与粮食安全：国际粮食政策研究所及比尔和梅琳达·盖茨基金会促进性别平等工作的经验教训》（2017年）第9卷：1091 - 1103页的回应

Response to Garcia and Wanner "gender inequality and food security: lessons for the gender-responsive work of the international food policy research institute and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation" (2017) 9:1091-1103.

作者信息

Meinzen-Dick Ruth, Quisumbing Agnes

机构信息

International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

Food Secur. 2018;10:247-251. doi: 10.1007/s12571-018-0766-7. Epub 2018 Jan 26.

DOI:10.1007/s12571-018-0766-7
PMID:32968461
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7473069/
Abstract

The paper by Garcia and Wanner reviews examples of gender-responsive research and programming from the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, to discuss those gender-responsive approaches which are most successful for achieving women's empowerment in agricultural development. It notes accomplishments and points out some shortcomings for both organizations to address. Although the objectives of the paper are worthwhile, we note important problems regarding methodology used, factual errors, and misrepresentation.

摘要

加西亚和万纳的论文回顾了国际粮食政策研究所（IFPRI）和比尔及梅琳达·盖茨基金会的性别敏感型研究与项目实例，以探讨那些在农业发展中实现妇女赋权方面最成功的性别敏感型方法。它指出了成就，并指出了两个组织需要解决的一些不足之处。尽管该论文的目标是有价值的，但我们注意到在所用方法、事实错误和错误表述方面存在重要问题。

相似文献

1
Response to Garcia and Wanner "gender inequality and food security: lessons for the gender-responsive work of the international food policy research institute and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation" (2017) 9:1091-1103.对加西亚和万纳《性别不平等与粮食安全：国际粮食政策研究所及比尔和梅琳达·盖茨基金会促进性别平等工作的经验教训》（2017年）第9卷：1091 - 1103页的回应
Food Secur. 2018;10:247-251. doi: 10.1007/s12571-018-0766-7. Epub 2018 Jan 26.
2
Joint study led by International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) puts meat-eating women's lives at risk.由国际食物政策研究所（IFPRI）牵头的一项联合研究使肉食女性的生命处于危险之中。
Indian J Med Ethics. 2021 Jan-Mar;VI(1):1-4. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2020.084.
3
Women's empowerment, production choices, and crop diversity in Burkina Faso, India, Malawi, and Tanzania: a secondary analysis of cross-sectional data.妇女赋权、生产选择和布基纳法索、印度、马拉维和坦桑尼亚的作物多样性：对横剖数据的二次分析。
Lancet Planet Health. 2023 Jul;7(7):e558-e569. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(23)00125-0.
4
Farming and the geography of nutrient production for human use: a transdisciplinary analysis.农业与供人类使用的养分生产地理：跨学科分析
Lancet Planet Health. 2017 Apr;1(1):e33-e42. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30007-4.
5
Integration is not enough: gender inequality and empowerment in Nicaraguan agricultural co-operatives.融合并不够：尼加拉瓜农业合作社中的性别不平等与赋权问题
Dev Policy Rev. 1993 Mar;11(1):67-89. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7679.1993.tb00029.x.
6
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation: An opportunity to lead innovation in global surgery.比尔及梅琳达·盖茨基金会：引领全球外科手术创新的机遇。
Surgery. 2019 Feb;165(2):273-280. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.08.002. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
7
The relationship between women's empowerment and household food and nutrition security in Pakistan.巴基斯坦妇女赋权与家庭粮食和营养安全之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 20;17(10):e0275713. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275713. eCollection 2022.
8
Profile: Interview with Rajeev Venkayya, MD, Director, Global Health Delivery, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and Former Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director for Biodefense, White House Homeland Security Council.
Biosecur Bioterror. 2008 Mar;6(1):13-8. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2008.0303.
9
Achieving sustainable agriculture through recognizing gender roles: some salient points.通过认识性别角色实现可持续农业：一些要点。
Gend Technol Dev. 1997 May-Aug;1(2):225-45. doi: 10.1177/097185249700100203.
10
How can Bill and Melinda Gates increase other people's donations to fund public goods?比尔和梅琳达·盖茨如何增加其他人对公共产品资金的捐赠？
J Public Econ. 2020 Nov;191:104296. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104296. Epub 2020 Oct 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Gender Differences in Nutritional Intake among Rural-Urban Migrants in China.中国城乡流动人口的营养摄入差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 17;18(18):9821. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189821.

本文引用的文献

1
THE SHORT-TERM IMPACT OF UNCONDITIONAL CASH TRANSFERS TO THE POOR: EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE FROM KENYA.向穷人提供无条件现金转移的短期影响：来自肯尼亚的实验证据。
Q J Econ. 2016 Nov;131(4):1973-2042. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjw025. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
2
Gender, Assets, and Agricultural Development: Lessons from Eight Projects.性别、资产与农业发展：八个项目的经验教训
World Dev. 2016 Jul;83:295-311. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.01.009.