Bidika Erjola, Fayyaz Hafsa, Salib Marina, Memon Areeba N, Gowda Asavari S, Rallabhandi Bhavana, Cancarevic Ivan
Internal Medicine, California Institute of Behavorial Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Internal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Cureus. 2020 Aug 21;12(8):e9920. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9920.
Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by platelet count less than 100×10/L and an increased risk of bleeding. The risk of bleeding increases in proportion with the degree of thrombocytopenia. Although several medications are used for primary thrombocytopenia treatment, refractoriness remains a concern. Romiplostim and eltrombopag, two relatively new drugs, have been shown to be successful in ITP treatment after standard treatment failure. The current guidelines recommend their use as a second-line treatment. In this article, we have tried to compare which of these two medications is the best option considering clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, adverse effects, and the possibility of switching between them in case of ineffectiveness. The studies used in this article were found in the PubMed database. All the studies are limited to adults. Based on these studies, both medications seem to be a largely effective, safe option. Romiplostim appears to have slightly fewer adverse effects and higher costs. Switching between thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TRAs) is a successful way to overcome adverse effects and inadequacy according to the currently available literature. We believe that more detailed studies are needed to determine which of these drugs should be considered the first choice, to report long term efficacy and adverse effects, and to determine if treatment guidelines can change regarding the use of TRAs as first-line treatment.
免疫性血小板减少症(ITP)是一种自身免疫性疾病,其特征为血小板计数低于100×10⁹/L且出血风险增加。出血风险随血小板减少程度成比例增加。尽管有几种药物用于原发性血小板减少症的治疗,但难治性仍是一个问题。罗米司亭和艾曲泊帕这两种相对较新的药物,在标准治疗失败后已被证明在ITP治疗中取得成功。目前的指南推荐将它们用作二线治疗。在本文中,我们试图比较这两种药物在临床疗效、成本效益、不良反应以及无效时相互转换的可能性等方面,哪一种是最佳选择。本文中使用的研究来自PubMed数据库。所有研究均限于成年人。基于这些研究,这两种药物似乎在很大程度上都是有效且安全的选择。罗米司亭的不良反应似乎略少,但成本更高。根据目前可得的文献,血小板生成素受体激动剂(TRA)之间的转换是克服不良反应和疗效不佳的一种成功方法。我们认为需要更详细的研究来确定这些药物中哪一种应被视为首选,报告长期疗效和不良反应,并确定关于将TRA用作一线治疗的治疗指南是否可以改变。