Campbell T Mark, Ramsay Tim, Trudel Guy
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Elisabeth Bruyère Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
PM R. 2021 Sep;13(9):954-961. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12497. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
Patients with or at risk of developing knee osteoarthritis (OA) can acquire a knee flexion contracture (FC). The prevalence, severity, and association of knee FC on OA outcomes such as pain, stiffness, and function are not well described and clinical scales may omit measuring joint range of motion.
(1) To determine if the presence and severity of a knee FC was associated with worse joint pain, stiffness and/or function and (2) to determine if this association was present in participants with or at risk of knee OA.
Following a detailed standardized protocol, maximum knee extension was obtained from the baseline physical examination data using a goniometer with the fulcrum over the knee joint line, the upper arm directed towards the greater trochanter and the lower arm directed towards the lateral malleolus.
Cross-sectional, using the Osteoarthritis Initiative database.
Baseline cross-sectional data collected from a prospective outpatient cohort study, recruiting from four academic health care centers in the United States. Three subcohorts were included: those at-risk of OA (n = 5995 knees), those with radiographic OA (n = 2610 knees), and controls (n = 62 knees).
We categorized knee FCs as none, mild, moderate, or severe. Pain scales included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale and numeric pain rating scale; stiffness, the WOMAC stiffness subscale; and function, the WOMAC function subscale and 400-m walk time.
Participants with FC reported overall worse pain, stiffness, and function compared to those without FC in a severity-dependent manner. OA participants' scores showed between 1.8- and 11.0-fold mean relative worsening versus at-risk participants (P < .05 for all). Knee FC was independently associated in a severity-dependent manner with all outcomes (P < .01).
Knee FCs were associated with worse pain, stiffness, and function in a severity-dependent manner in a population with or at risk of knee OA. There was an interaction between OA subcohort and FC severity (P-for-interaction <.01 for all WOMAC outcomes). Evaluation of the longitudinal effects of contracture on OA and at-risk patient outcomes is necessary.
患有膝关节骨关节炎(OA)或有患膝关节骨关节炎风险的患者可能会出现膝关节屈曲挛缩(FC)。膝关节FC的患病率、严重程度及其与OA相关结局(如疼痛、僵硬和功能)之间的关联尚未得到充分描述,而且临床量表可能会忽略对关节活动范围的测量。
(1)确定膝关节FC的存在和严重程度是否与更严重的关节疼痛、僵硬和/或功能相关;(2)确定这种关联是否存在于患有膝关节OA或有患膝关节OA风险的参与者中。
按照详细的标准化方案,在基线体格检查数据中,使用角度计测量最大膝关节伸展度,角度计的支点位于膝关节线上,上臂指向大转子,下臂指向外踝。
横断面研究,使用骨关节炎倡议数据库。
从美国四个学术医疗中心招募的前瞻性门诊队列研究收集的基线横断面数据。包括三个亚组:有OA风险的人群(n = 5995个膝关节)、有影像学OA的人群(n = 2610个膝关节)和对照组(n = 62个膝关节)。
我们将膝关节FC分为无、轻度、中度或重度。疼痛量表包括西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)疼痛子量表和数字疼痛评分量表;僵硬程度采用WOMAC僵硬子量表;功能采用WOMAC功能子量表和400米步行时间。
与没有FC的参与者相比,有FC的参与者在疼痛、僵硬和功能方面总体表现更差,且呈严重程度依赖性。OA参与者的评分显示,与有风险的参与者相比,平均相对恶化程度在1.8至11.0倍之间(所有P值均<0.05)。膝关节FC与所有结局均呈严重程度依赖性独立相关(P<0.01)。
在患有膝关节OA或有患膝关节OA风险的人群中,膝关节FC与更严重的疼痛、僵硬和功能相关,且呈严重程度依赖性。OA亚组与FC严重程度之间存在相互作用(所有WOMAC结局的交互作用P值<0.01)。有必要评估挛缩对OA和有风险患者结局的纵向影响。