Kramer Robin S S, Jones Alex L
School of Psychology, University of Lincoln.
Department of Psychology, Swansea University.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020 Dec;46(12):1476-1489. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000869. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
When evaluating items in a sequence, the current judgment is influenced by the previous item and decision. These sequential biases take the form of assimilation (shifting toward the previous item/decision) or contrast (shifting away). Previous research investigating facial attractiveness evaluations provides mixed results while using analytical techniques that fail to address the dependencies in the data or acknowledge that the images represent only a subset of the population. Here, we utilized cross-classified linear mixed-effects modeling across 5 experiments. We found compelling evidence of multicollinearity in our models, which may explain apparent contradictions in the literature. Our results demonstrated that the previous image's rating positively influenced current ratings, and this was also the case for the previous image's baseline value, although only when that image remained onscreen during the current trial. Further, we found no influence of the next face on current judgments when this was visible. In our final experiment, the response bias due to the previous trial remained present even when accounts involving motor effort were addressed. Taken together, these findings provide a clear framework in which to incorporate current and past results regarding the biases apparent in sequential judgments, along with an appropriate method for investigating these biases. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
在评估序列中的项目时,当前的判断会受到前一个项目和决策的影响。这些序列偏差表现为同化(朝着前一个项目/决策移动)或对比(背离)的形式。以往调查面部吸引力评估的研究在使用未能解决数据依赖性或未承认图像仅代表总体的一个子集的分析技术时,得出了混合的结果。在此,我们在5个实验中采用了交叉分类线性混合效应模型。我们在模型中发现了令人信服的多重共线性证据,这可能解释了文献中明显的矛盾之处。我们的结果表明,前一张图像的评分对当前评分有正向影响,前一张图像的基线值也是如此,不过只有当该图像在当前试验期间仍显示在屏幕上时才是这样。此外,当能看到下一张脸时,我们发现它对当前判断没有影响。在我们的最后一个实验中,即使考虑了涉及运动努力的因素,前一次试验造成的反应偏差仍然存在。综上所述,这些发现提供了一个清晰的框架,可将关于序列判断中明显偏差的当前和过去结果纳入其中,同时提供了一种研究这些偏差的适当方法。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》(c)2020美国心理学会,保留所有权利)