Suppr超能文献

非特异性下腰痛患者的运动控制稳定训练:一项关于干预效果的多水平Meta回归前瞻性Meta分析

Motor Control Stabilisation Exercise for Patients with Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Prospective Meta-Analysis with Multilevel Meta-Regressions on Intervention Effects.

作者信息

Niederer Daniel, Engel Tilman, Vogt Lutz, Arampatzis Adamantios, Banzer Winfried, Beck Heidrun, Moreno Catalá María, Brenner-Fliesser Michael, Güthoff Claas, Haag Thore, Hönning Alexander, Pfeifer Ann-Christin, Platen Petra, Schiltenwolf Marcus, Schneider Christian, Trompeter Katharina, Wippert Pia-Maria, Mayer Frank

机构信息

Department of Sports Medicine and Exercise Physiology, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60487 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

University Outpatient Clinic, Centre of Sports Medicine, University of Potsdam, 14469 Potsdam, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2020 Sep 22;9(9):3058. doi: 10.3390/jcm9093058.

Abstract

Low-to-moderate quality meta-analytic evidence shows that motor control stabilisation exercise (MCE) is an effective treatment of non-specific low back pain. A possible approach to overcome the weaknesses of traditional meta-analyses would be that of a prospective meta-analyses. The aim of the present analysis was to generate high-quality evidence to support the view that motor control stabilisation exercises (MCE) lead to a reduction in pain intensity and disability in non-specific low back pain patients when compared to a control group. In this prospective meta-analysis and sensitivity multilevel meta-regression within the MiSpEx-Network, 18 randomized controlled study arms were included. Participants with non-specific low back pain were allocated to an intervention (individualized MCE, 12 weeks) or a control group (no additive exercise intervention). From each study site/arm, outcomes at baseline, 3 weeks, 12 weeks, and 6 months were pooled. The outcomes were current pain (NRS or VAS, 11 points scale), characteristic pain intensity, and subjective disability. A random effects meta-analysis model for continuous outcomes to display standardized mean differences between intervention and control was performed, followed by sensitivity multilevel meta-regressions. Overall, 2391 patients were randomized; 1976 (3 weeks, short-term), 1740 (12 weeks, intermediate), and 1560 (6 months, sustainability) participants were included in the meta-analyses. In the short-term, intermediate and sustainability, moderate-to-high quality evidence indicated that MCE has a larger effect on current pain (SMD = -0.15, -0.15, -0.19), pain intensity (SMD = -0.19, -0.26, -0.26) and disability (SMD = -0.15, -0.27, -0.25) compared with no exercise intervention. Low-quality evidence suggested that those patients with comparably intermediate current pain and older patients may profit the most from MCE. Motor control stabilisation exercise is an effective treatment for non-specific low back pain. Sub-clinical intermediate pain and middle-aged patients may profit the most from this intervention.

摘要

低至中等质量的荟萃分析证据表明,运动控制稳定训练(MCE)是治疗非特异性下腰痛的有效方法。克服传统荟萃分析弱点的一种可能方法是进行前瞻性荟萃分析。本分析的目的是生成高质量证据,以支持以下观点:与对照组相比,运动控制稳定训练(MCE)可降低非特异性下腰痛患者的疼痛强度和残疾程度。在MiSpEx网络内的这项前瞻性荟萃分析和敏感性多级荟萃回归中,纳入了18个随机对照研究组。非特异性下腰痛患者被分配到干预组(个体化MCE,为期12周)或对照组(无额外运动干预)。汇总每个研究地点/研究组在基线、3周、12周和6个月时的结果。结果指标包括当前疼痛(数字评分量表或视觉模拟量表,11分制)、特征性疼痛强度和主观残疾程度。对连续结果进行随机效应荟萃分析模型,以显示干预组和对照组之间的标准化均值差异,随后进行敏感性多级荟萃回归。总体而言,2391例患者被随机分组;荟萃分析纳入了1976例(3周,短期)、1740例(12周,中期)和1560例(6个月,持续性)参与者。在短期、中期和持续性方面,中至高质量证据表明,与无运动干预相比,MCE对当前疼痛(标准化均值差= -0.15、-0.15、-0.19)、疼痛强度(标准化均值差= -0.19、-0.26、-0.26)和残疾程度(标准化均值差= -0.15、-0.27、-0.25)的影响更大。低质量证据表明,那些当前疼痛程度中等且年龄较大的患者可能从MCE中获益最多。运动控制稳定训练是治疗非特异性下腰痛的有效方法。亚临床中度疼痛患者和中年患者可能从这种干预中获益最多。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28d8/7564352/e6acdece5de6/jcm-09-03058-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验