Niederer Daniel, Engel Tilman, Vogt Lutz, Arampatzis Adamantios, Banzer Winfried, Beck Heidrun, Moreno Catalá María, Brenner-Fliesser Michael, Güthoff Claas, Haag Thore, Hönning Alexander, Pfeifer Ann-Christin, Platen Petra, Schiltenwolf Marcus, Schneider Christian, Trompeter Katharina, Wippert Pia-Maria, Mayer Frank
Department of Sports Medicine and Exercise Physiology, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60487 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
University Outpatient Clinic, Centre of Sports Medicine, University of Potsdam, 14469 Potsdam, Germany.
J Clin Med. 2020 Sep 22;9(9):3058. doi: 10.3390/jcm9093058.
Low-to-moderate quality meta-analytic evidence shows that motor control stabilisation exercise (MCE) is an effective treatment of non-specific low back pain. A possible approach to overcome the weaknesses of traditional meta-analyses would be that of a prospective meta-analyses. The aim of the present analysis was to generate high-quality evidence to support the view that motor control stabilisation exercises (MCE) lead to a reduction in pain intensity and disability in non-specific low back pain patients when compared to a control group. In this prospective meta-analysis and sensitivity multilevel meta-regression within the MiSpEx-Network, 18 randomized controlled study arms were included. Participants with non-specific low back pain were allocated to an intervention (individualized MCE, 12 weeks) or a control group (no additive exercise intervention). From each study site/arm, outcomes at baseline, 3 weeks, 12 weeks, and 6 months were pooled. The outcomes were current pain (NRS or VAS, 11 points scale), characteristic pain intensity, and subjective disability. A random effects meta-analysis model for continuous outcomes to display standardized mean differences between intervention and control was performed, followed by sensitivity multilevel meta-regressions. Overall, 2391 patients were randomized; 1976 (3 weeks, short-term), 1740 (12 weeks, intermediate), and 1560 (6 months, sustainability) participants were included in the meta-analyses. In the short-term, intermediate and sustainability, moderate-to-high quality evidence indicated that MCE has a larger effect on current pain (SMD = -0.15, -0.15, -0.19), pain intensity (SMD = -0.19, -0.26, -0.26) and disability (SMD = -0.15, -0.27, -0.25) compared with no exercise intervention. Low-quality evidence suggested that those patients with comparably intermediate current pain and older patients may profit the most from MCE. Motor control stabilisation exercise is an effective treatment for non-specific low back pain. Sub-clinical intermediate pain and middle-aged patients may profit the most from this intervention.
低至中等质量的荟萃分析证据表明,运动控制稳定训练(MCE)是治疗非特异性下腰痛的有效方法。克服传统荟萃分析弱点的一种可能方法是进行前瞻性荟萃分析。本分析的目的是生成高质量证据,以支持以下观点:与对照组相比,运动控制稳定训练(MCE)可降低非特异性下腰痛患者的疼痛强度和残疾程度。在MiSpEx网络内的这项前瞻性荟萃分析和敏感性多级荟萃回归中,纳入了18个随机对照研究组。非特异性下腰痛患者被分配到干预组(个体化MCE,为期12周)或对照组(无额外运动干预)。汇总每个研究地点/研究组在基线、3周、12周和6个月时的结果。结果指标包括当前疼痛(数字评分量表或视觉模拟量表,11分制)、特征性疼痛强度和主观残疾程度。对连续结果进行随机效应荟萃分析模型,以显示干预组和对照组之间的标准化均值差异,随后进行敏感性多级荟萃回归。总体而言,2391例患者被随机分组;荟萃分析纳入了1976例(3周,短期)、1740例(12周,中期)和1560例(6个月,持续性)参与者。在短期、中期和持续性方面,中至高质量证据表明,与无运动干预相比,MCE对当前疼痛(标准化均值差= -0.15、-0.15、-0.19)、疼痛强度(标准化均值差= -0.19、-0.26、-0.26)和残疾程度(标准化均值差= -0.15、-0.27、-0.25)的影响更大。低质量证据表明,那些当前疼痛程度中等且年龄较大的患者可能从MCE中获益最多。运动控制稳定训练是治疗非特异性下腰痛的有效方法。亚临床中度疼痛患者和中年患者可能从这种干预中获益最多。