John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138;
Institute for Data, Systems, and Society, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Oct 13;117(41):25904-25910. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2010651117. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, formulating targeted policy interventions that are informed by differential severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission dynamics will be of vital importance to national and regional governments. We develop an individual-level model for SARS-CoV-2 transmission that accounts for location-dependent distributions of age, household structure, and comorbidities. We use these distributions together with age-stratified contact matrices to instantiate specific models for Hubei, China; Lombardy, Italy; and New York City, United States. Using data on reported deaths to obtain a posterior distribution over unknown parameters, we infer differences in the progression of the epidemic in the three locations. We also examine the role of transmission due to particular age groups on total infections and deaths. The effect of limiting contacts by a particular age group varies by location, indicating that strategies to reduce transmission should be tailored based on population-specific demography and social structure. These findings highlight the role of between-population variation in formulating policy interventions. Across the three populations, though, we find that targeted "salutary sheltering" by 50% of a single age group may substantially curtail transmission when combined with the adoption of physical distancing measures by the rest of the population.
随着 COVID-19 大流行的持续,制定基于差异化严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)传播动力学的有针对性的政策干预措施对于国家和地区政府来说至关重要。我们开发了一种针对 SARS-CoV-2 传播的个体水平模型,该模型考虑了年龄、家庭结构和合并症的位置相关分布。我们使用这些分布以及年龄分层的接触矩阵,为中国湖北省、意大利伦巴第大区和美国纽约市具体建模。我们使用报告死亡的数据来获得未知参数的后验分布,从而推断出这三个地点疫情发展的差异。我们还研究了特定年龄组传播对总感染和死亡的影响。特定年龄组限制接触的效果因地点而异,这表明应根据特定人群的人口统计学和社会结构来制定减少传播的策略。这些发现强调了制定政策干预措施时考虑人群间差异的重要性。然而,我们发现,对于这三个人群,通过 50%的单个年龄组进行有针对性的“有益庇护”,并结合其余人群采取身体距离措施,可能会大大减少传播。