• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接触模式的改变塑造了中国 COVID-19 疫情的动态。

Changes in contact patterns shape the dynamics of the COVID-19 outbreak in China.

机构信息

School of Public Health, Fudan University, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Ministry of Education, Shanghai, China.

ISI Foundation, Turin, Italy.

出版信息

Science. 2020 Jun 26;368(6498):1481-1486. doi: 10.1126/science.abb8001. Epub 2020 Apr 29.

DOI:10.1126/science.abb8001
PMID:32350060
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7199529/
Abstract

Intense nonpharmaceutical interventions were put in place in China to stop transmission of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). As transmission intensifies in other countries, the interplay between age, contact patterns, social distancing, susceptibility to infection, and COVID-19 dynamics remains unclear. To answer these questions, we analyze contact survey data for Wuhan and Shanghai before and during the outbreak and contact-tracing information from Hunan province. Daily contacts were reduced seven- to eightfold during the COVID-19 social distancing period, with most interactions restricted to the household. We find that children 0 to 14 years of age are less susceptible to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection than adults 15 to 64 years of age (odds ratio 0.34, 95% confidence interval 0.24 to 0.49), whereas individuals more than 65 years of age are more susceptible to infection (odds ratio 1.47, 95% confidence interval 1.12 to 1.92). Based on these data, we built a transmission model to study the impact of social distancing and school closure on transmission. We find that social distancing alone, as implemented in China during the outbreak, is sufficient to control COVID-19. Although proactive school closures cannot interrupt transmission on their own, they can reduce peak incidence by 40 to 60% and delay the epidemic.

摘要

中国采取了高强度的非药物干预措施来阻止 2019 年新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的传播。随着其他国家的传播加剧,年龄、接触模式、社交距离、易感性和 COVID-19 动力学之间的相互作用仍不清楚。为了回答这些问题,我们分析了武汉和上海在疫情爆发前后的接触调查数据,以及湖南省的接触追踪信息。在 COVID-19 社交距离期间,日常接触减少了七到八成,大多数互动都局限于家庭内部。我们发现,儿童(0 至 14 岁)比成年人(15 至 64 岁)更容易感染严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)(比值比 0.34,95%置信区间 0.24 至 0.49),而 65 岁以上的人更容易感染(比值比 1.47,95%置信区间 1.12 至 1.92)。基于这些数据,我们建立了一个传播模型来研究社交距离和学校关闭对传播的影响。我们发现,仅实施中国在疫情期间实施的社交距离措施就足以控制 COVID-19。虽然主动关闭学校本身无法阻断传播,但可以将峰值发病率降低 40%至 60%,并延迟疫情。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d9d/7199529/ecd6064ca603/368_1481_F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d9d/7199529/33f5b9400f21/368_1481_F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d9d/7199529/5bedbfa50882/368_1481_F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d9d/7199529/ecd6064ca603/368_1481_F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d9d/7199529/33f5b9400f21/368_1481_F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d9d/7199529/5bedbfa50882/368_1481_F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d9d/7199529/ecd6064ca603/368_1481_F3.jpg

相似文献

1
Changes in contact patterns shape the dynamics of the COVID-19 outbreak in China.接触模式的改变塑造了中国 COVID-19 疫情的动态。
Science. 2020 Jun 26;368(6498):1481-1486. doi: 10.1126/science.abb8001. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
2
Determining the optimal strategy for reopening schools, the impact of test and trace interventions, and the risk of occurrence of a second COVID-19 epidemic wave in the UK: a modelling study.确定英国学校重新开放的最佳策略、检测和追踪干预措施的影响,以及发生第二波 COVID-19 疫情的风险:一项建模研究。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020 Nov;4(11):817-827. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30250-9. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
3
Epidemiology and transmission of COVID-19 in 391 cases and 1286 of their close contacts in Shenzhen, China: a retrospective cohort study.中国深圳 391 例病例及其 1286 名密切接触者的 COVID-19 流行病学和传播:一项回顾性队列研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Aug;20(8):911-919. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30287-5. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
4
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Social Distancing Interventions to Delay or Flatten the Epidemic Curve of Coronavirus Disease.评估社交隔离干预措施在延迟或拉平冠状病毒病流行曲线方面的效果。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Aug;26(8):1740-1748. doi: 10.3201/eid2608.201093. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
5
Effectiveness of isolation, testing, contact tracing, and physical distancing on reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in different settings: a mathematical modelling study.隔离、检测、接触者追踪和保持社交距离在不同环境下减少 SARS-CoV-2 传播的效果:一项数学建模研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Oct;20(10):1151-1160. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30457-6. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
6
Projected effects of nonpharmaceutical public health interventions to prevent resurgence of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in Canada.预测非药物公共卫生干预措施对防止 SARS-CoV-2 在加拿大传播反弹的影响。
CMAJ. 2020 Sep 14;192(37):E1053-E1064. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.200990. Epub 2020 Aug 9.
7
Household secondary attack rate of COVID-19 and associated determinants in Guangzhou, China: a retrospective cohort study.家庭二次感染 COVID-19 的发生率及其在中国广州的相关决定因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Oct;20(10):1141-1150. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30471-0. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
8
Age profile of susceptibility, mixing, and social distancing shape the dynamics of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak in China.易感性、人群混合及社交距离的年龄分布塑造了2019年新型冠状病毒病在中国爆发的动态变化。
medRxiv. 2020 Mar 20:2020.03.19.20039107. doi: 10.1101/2020.03.19.20039107.
9
Contact Tracing during Coronavirus Disease Outbreak, South Korea, 2020.2020 年韩国冠状病毒病疫情期间的接触者追踪。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Oct;26(10):2465-2468. doi: 10.3201/eid2610.201315. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
10
Impact of self-imposed prevention measures and short-term government-imposed social distancing on mitigating and delaying a COVID-19 epidemic: A modelling study.自行采取预防措施和短期政府实施社会隔离对减轻和延缓 COVID-19 疫情的影响:建模研究。
PLoS Med. 2020 Jul 21;17(7):e1003166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003166. eCollection 2020 Jul.

引用本文的文献

1
Inferring the timing of individual mobility decisions from accommodation reservation data during the COVID-19 outbreak.在新冠疫情期间从住宿预订数据推断个人出行决策的时间
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Jul 30;12(7):250554. doi: 10.1098/rsos.250554. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Circulated echovirus 18 strains in Guangdong Province and worldwide: A novel perspective on genetic diversity and recombination patterns.广东省及全球流行的肠道病毒18型毒株:关于遗传多样性和重组模式的新视角
Virulence. 2025 Dec;16(1):2534519. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2025.2534519. Epub 2025 Jul 23.
3
Associated factors in SARS-CoV-2 infection among close contacts during the zero-COVID policy from 2020 to 2022 in the northeast of Shenzhen, China: a retrospective cohort study.

本文引用的文献

1
The Epidemiological Characteristics of an Outbreak of 2019 Novel Coronavirus Diseases (COVID-19) - China, 2020.2019新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫情的流行病学特征 - 中国,2020年
China CDC Wkly. 2020 Feb 21;2(8):113-122.
2
Novel coronavirus 2019-nCoV (COVID-19): early estimation of epidemiological parameters and epidemic size estimates.新型冠状病毒 2019-nCoV (COVID-19):流行病学参数和疫情规模的早期估计。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Jul 19;376(1829):20200265. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0265. Epub 2021 May 31.
3
Inferring high-resolution human mixing patterns for disease modeling.
2020年至2022年中国深圳东北部疫情防控期间密切接触者中新型冠状病毒感染的相关因素:一项回顾性队列研究
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 11;13:1589683. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1589683. eCollection 2025.
4
The effect of urban-rail station area coverage on city blocks' epidemic transmission: the case of the rail-supportive city of Beijing, China.城市轨道交通站点区域覆盖对城市街区疫情传播的影响:以中国轨道支撑型城市北京为例
Front Public Health. 2025 May 30;13:1588004. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1588004. eCollection 2025.
5
Comparative evaluation of behavioral epidemic models using COVID-19 data.利用新冠疫情数据对行为流行模型进行比较评估。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jun 17;122(24):e2421993122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2421993122. Epub 2025 Jun 12.
6
Adaptively temporal graph convolution model for epidemic prediction of multiple age groups.用于多年龄组疫情预测的自适应时间图卷积模型
Fundam Res. 2021 Aug 8;2(2):311-320. doi: 10.1016/j.fmre.2021.07.007. eCollection 2022 Mar.
7
Epidemic Dynamics and Intervention Measures in Campus Settings Based on Multilayer Temporal Networks.基于多层时间网络的校园环境中的疫情动态与干预措施
Entropy (Basel). 2025 May 21;27(5):543. doi: 10.3390/e27050543.
8
Evaluating the association between COVID-19 transmission and mobility in omicron outbreaks in China.评估中国奥密克戎疫情中新冠病毒传播与流动性之间的关联。
Commun Med (Lond). 2025 May 20;5(1):188. doi: 10.1038/s43856-025-00906-7.
9
Changes in social contact patterns in Germany during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic - an analysis based on the COVIMOD study.新冠疫情期间德国社会接触模式的变化——基于COVIMOD研究的分析
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Apr 23;25(1):588. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-10917-3.
10
Differences in depression prevalence among older adults in China before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis.中国老年人在新冠疫情之前及期间抑郁症患病率的差异:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
PeerJ. 2025 Apr 11;13:e19251. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19251. eCollection 2025.
推断高分辨率人类混合模式以进行疾病建模。
Nat Commun. 2021 Jan 12;12(1):323. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20544-y.
4
Anxiety levels, precautionary behaviours and public perceptions during the early phase of the COVID-19 outbreak in China: a population-based cross-sectional survey.中国 COVID-19 疫情早期的焦虑水平、预防行为和公众认知:一项基于人群的横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 8;10(10):e040910. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040910.
5
Quantifying the impact of physical distance measures on the transmission of COVID-19 in the UK.量化身体距离措施对英国 COVID-19 传播的影响。
BMC Med. 2020 May 7;18(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01597-8.
6
Effect of non-pharmaceutical interventions to contain COVID-19 in China.中国采取的非药物性干预措施对遏制 2019 冠状病毒病的效果。
Nature. 2020 Sep;585(7825):410-413. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2293-x. Epub 2020 May 4.
7
The transmissibility of novel Coronavirus in the early stages of the 2019-20 outbreak in Wuhan: Exploring initial point-source exposure sizes and durations using scenario analysis.2019-2020年武汉疫情初期新型冠状病毒的传播性:运用情景分析探索初始点源暴露规模和持续时间
Wellcome Open Res. 2020 Feb 3;5:17. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15718.1. eCollection 2020.
8
Impact assessment of non-pharmaceutical interventions against coronavirus disease 2019 and influenza in Hong Kong: an observational study.非药物干预措施对 2019 年冠状病毒病和流感在香港的影响评估:一项观察性研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2020 May;5(5):e279-e288. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30090-6. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
9
First-wave COVID-19 transmissibility and severity in China outside Hubei after control measures, and second-wave scenario planning: a modelling impact assessment.中国湖北省以外地区采取控制措施后第一波 COVID-19 的传染性和严重程度,以及第二波疫情情景规划:模型影响评估。
Lancet. 2020 Apr 25;395(10233):1382-1393. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30746-7. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
10
Evolving epidemiology and transmission dynamics of coronavirus disease 2019 outside Hubei province, China: a descriptive and modelling study.中国湖北省以外地区 2019 年冠状病毒病的流行病学和传播动态演变:描述性和建模研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Jul;20(7):793-802. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30230-9. Epub 2020 Apr 2.