• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲堕胎和跨境生殖保健的孕龄限制:一项混合方法研究。

Gestational age limits for abortion and cross-border reproductive care in Europe: a mixed-methods study.

机构信息

Department of Anthropology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Department of People and Organisations, School of Business and Management, Queen Mary, University of London, London, UK.

出版信息

BJOG. 2021 Apr;128(5):838-845. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16534. Epub 2020 Oct 23.

DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.16534
PMID:32975864
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7984202/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Little is known about the experiences of women who travel within Europe for abortion care from countries with relatively liberal laws. This paper aims to assess the primary reasons for travel among a sample of women who travelled from European countries with relatively liberal abortion laws to obtain abortion care mainly in the UK and the Netherlands.

DESIGN

Multi-country, 5-year mixed methods study on barriers to legal abortion and travel for abortion.

SETTING

UK, the Netherlands and Spain.

POPULATION OR SAMPLE

We present quantitative data from 204 surveys, and qualitative data from 30 in-depth interviews with pregnant people who travelled to the UK, the Netherlands and Spain from countries where abortion is legal on broad grounds within specific gestational age (GA) limits.

METHODS

Mixed-methods.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

GA when presenting at abortion clinic, primary reason for abortion-related travel.

RESULTS

Study participants overwhelmingly reported travelling for abortion because they had exceeded GA limits in their country of residence. Participants also reported numerous delays and barriers to receiving care.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings highlight the need for policies that support access to abortion throughout pregnancy and illustrate that early access to it is necessary but not sufficient to meet people's reproductive health needs.

FUNDING

This study is funded by the European Research Council (ERC).

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

This study shows that GA limits drive women from EU countries where abortion is legal to seek abortions abroad.

摘要

目的

对于那些从法律相对宽松的国家前往欧洲其他国家寻求堕胎服务的女性,人们对其经历知之甚少。本文旨在评估一组从法律相对宽松的欧洲国家前往英国和荷兰寻求堕胎服务的女性出行的主要原因。

设计

一项为期五年的多国混合方法研究,旨在研究合法堕胎和堕胎旅行的障碍。

地点

英国、荷兰和西班牙。

人群或样本

我们展示了来自 204 份调查的定量数据,以及来自 30 名从堕胎在广泛的理由和特定妊娠(GA)限制范围内合法的国家前往英国、荷兰和西班牙的孕妇的深入访谈的定性数据。

方法

混合方法。

主要观察指标

在堕胎诊所就诊时的 GA,与堕胎相关旅行的主要原因。

结果

研究参与者绝大多数表示,他们之所以出国堕胎,是因为他们在居住国的 GA 超过了限制。参与者还报告了许多接受护理的延误和障碍。

结论

我们的研究结果强调了需要制定支持整个孕期堕胎的政策,并说明尽早获得堕胎服务是必要的,但不足以满足人们的生殖健康需求。

资金

本研究由欧洲研究理事会(ERC)资助。

推文摘要

本研究表明,GA 限制促使来自欧盟国家的女性到国外寻求堕胎。

相似文献

1
Gestational age limits for abortion and cross-border reproductive care in Europe: a mixed-methods study.欧洲堕胎和跨境生殖保健的孕龄限制:一项混合方法研究。
BJOG. 2021 Apr;128(5):838-845. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16534. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
2
Cross-country abortion travel to England and Wales: results from a cross-sectional survey exploring people's experiences crossing borders to obtain care.跨境堕胎旅行至英格兰和威尔士:一项横断面调查研究人们跨境获取医疗服务的经验
Reprod Health. 2021 May 22;18(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01158-z.
3
"The first difficulty is time": The impact of gestational age limits on reproductive health and justice in the context of cross-border travel for abortion care in Europe.“第一个困难是时间”:在跨境堕胎护理的背景下,妊娠年龄限制对生殖健康和公正的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Mar;321:115760. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115760. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
4
Experiences of women who travel to England for abortions: an exploratory pilot study.前往英国进行堕胎手术的女性经历:一项探索性试点研究。
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2016 Oct;21(5):401-7. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2016.1217325. Epub 2016 Aug 19.
5
Barriers and delays in access to abortion care: a cross-sectional study of people traveling to obtain care in England and the Netherlands from European countries where abortion is legal on broad grounds.获取堕胎护理的障碍和延迟:一项横断面研究,研究对象为从广泛允许堕胎的欧洲国家前往英格兰和荷兰获取堕胎护理的人。
Reprod Health. 2024 Jan 15;21(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01729-2.
6
Circumvention tourism.迂回旅游。
Cornell Law Rev. 2012 Sep;97(6):1309-98.
7
French women's experiences and opinions with in-country versus cross-border abortion travel: a mixed-methods paper.法国女性在国内和跨境堕胎旅行方面的经历和看法:一项混合方法研究论文。
BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2023 Jul;49(3):158-166. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2022-201712. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
8
Restricted access to abortion in the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland: exploring abortion tourism and barriers to legal reform.爱尔兰共和国和北爱尔兰限制堕胎:探讨堕胎旅游和法律改革障碍。
Cult Health Sex. 2014;16(4):366-80. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2014.886724. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
9
Accessibility and availability of abortion in six European countries.六个欧洲国家堕胎的可及性与可得性。
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2005 Mar;10(1):51-8. doi: 10.1080/13625180500035231.
10
Barriers around access to abortion experienced by rural women in New South Wales, Australia.澳大利亚新南威尔士州农村妇女在获取堕胎服务方面遇到的障碍。
Rural Remote Health. 2016 Jan-Mar;16(1):3538. Epub 2016 Mar 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Obstetricians' views on extending the 12-week abortion limit in Belgium: A qualitative study.比利时产科医生对延长12周堕胎期限的看法:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 18;20(6):e0325434. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325434. eCollection 2025.
2
The impact of gestational age limits on abortion-related outcomes: a synthesis of legal and health evidence.孕周限制对堕胎相关结果的影响:法律与健康证据的综合分析
BMC Glob Public Health. 2025 Feb 3;3(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s44263-025-00124-2.
3
A global scoping review of the circumstances of care seeking for abortion later in pregnancy.对妊娠晚期寻求堕胎护理情况的全球范围综述。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Dec 5;4(12):e0003965. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003965. eCollection 2024.
4
Barriers and delays in access to abortion care: a cross-sectional study of people traveling to obtain care in England and the Netherlands from European countries where abortion is legal on broad grounds.获取堕胎护理的障碍和延迟:一项横断面研究,研究对象为从广泛允许堕胎的欧洲国家前往英格兰和荷兰获取堕胎护理的人。
Reprod Health. 2024 Jan 15;21(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01729-2.
5
Out-of-State Travel for Abortion among Texas Residents following an Executive Order Suspending In-State Services during the Coronavirus Pandemic.德克萨斯州居民在冠状病毒大流行期间,行政命令暂停本州服务后,前往州外进行堕胎。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 19;20(4):3679. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043679.
6
Society for Medical Anthropology Statement on Supreme Court Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.医学人类学学会就最高法院多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案的声明
Med Anthropol Q. 2022 Dec;36(4):433-441. doi: 10.1111/maq.12741. Epub 2022 Nov 26.
7
Inter-departmental abortion travels in metropolitan France: A mixed-methods analysis of women's experiences, access, and barriers to abortion care.法国大都市地区的跨部门堕胎旅行:对女性堕胎护理体验、途径和障碍的混合方法分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 4;17(10):e0273190. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273190. eCollection 2022.
8
Factors influencing abortion decisions, delays, and experiences with abortion accompaniment in Mexico among women living outside Mexico City: results from a cross-sectional study.影响生活在墨西哥城外的妇女堕胎决定、延迟和堕胎陪伴体验的因素:一项横断面研究的结果。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2021;29(3):2038359. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2022.2038359.
9
Permeability of abortion care in the Netherlands: a qualitative analysis of women's experiences, health professional perspectives, and the internet resource of Women on Web.荷兰堕胎护理的可及性:对女性体验、卫生专业人员观点以及 Women on Web 互联网资源的定性分析。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2021 Dec;29(1):1917042. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2021.1917042.
10
Consequences of gestational age limits for people needing abortion care during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间,孕周限制对需要堕胎护理者的影响。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2020 Dec;28(1):1818377. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2020.1818377.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of gynecologists' conscientious objection on abortion access.妇科医生的良心反对对堕胎机会的影响。
Soc Sci Res. 2020 Mar;87:102403. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2020.102403. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
2
Global Abortion Policies Database: A descriptive analysis of the regulatory and policy environment related to abortion.全球堕胎政策数据库:对与堕胎相关的监管和政策环境的描述性分析。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Jan;62:25-35. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.06.002. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
3
Experiences of women who travel for abortion: A mixed methods systematic review.女性跨境堕胎的经历:一项混合方法系统评价。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 9;14(4):e0209991. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209991. eCollection 2019.
4
Regulation of Conscientious Objection to Abortion: An International Comparative Multiple-Case Study.堕胎良心拒服权的规制:一项国际比较多案例研究
Health Hum Rights. 2017 Jun;19(1):55-68.
5
Barriers to Abortion Care and Their Consequences For Patients Traveling for Services: Qualitative Findings from Two States.堕胎护理的障碍及其对前往接受服务的患者的影响:来自两个州的定性研究结果
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2017 Jun;49(2):95-102. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12024. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
6
Women's Experience Obtaining Abortion Care in Texas after Implementation of Restrictive Abortion Laws: A Qualitative Study.德克萨斯州实施限制堕胎法后妇女获得堕胎护理的体验:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 26;11(10):e0165048. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165048. eCollection 2016.
7
Experiences of women who travel to England for abortions: an exploratory pilot study.前往英国进行堕胎手术的女性经历:一项探索性试点研究。
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2016 Oct;21(5):401-7. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2016.1217325. Epub 2016 Aug 19.
8
The Longest Wait: Examining the Impact of Utah's 72-Hour Waiting Period for Abortion.最长的等待:审视犹他州堕胎72小时等待期的影响。
Womens Health Issues. 2016 Sep-Oct;26(5):483-7. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
9
Impact of Clinic Closures on Women Obtaining Abortion Services After Implementation of a Restrictive Law in Texas.在德克萨斯州实施一项限制性法律后,诊所关闭对妇女获得堕胎服务的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2016 May;106(5):857-64. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303134. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
10
A review of abortion laws in Western-European countries. A cross-national comparison of legal developments between 1960 and 2010.西欧国家堕胎法综述。1960年至2010年间法律发展的跨国比较。
Health Policy. 2014 Oct;118(1):95-104. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.06.008. Epub 2014 Jul 7.