He Changjiu, Liu Jieke, Hu Shibei, Qing Haomiao, Qiao Liang, Luo Hongbing, Chen Xiaoli, Zhou Peng
From the Department of Radiology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China.
Department of Cancer Prevention and Treatment, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2020 Nov/Dec;44(6):847-851. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000001102.
The aim of the study was to assess accuracy of pulmonary nodule volumetry using noise-optimized virtual monoenergetic image (VMI+) and nonlinear blending image (NBI) algorithms in dual-energy computed tomography (DECT).
An anthropomorphic chest phantom with 10 simulated nodules (5 solid nodules and 5 ground-glass opacities) was scanned using DECT80/Sn140kV, DECT100/Sn140kV, and single-energy CT (SECT120kV/200mAs), respectively. The dual-energy images were reconstructed using VMI+ (70 keV) and NBI algorithms. The contrast-to-noise ratio and absolute percentage error (APE) of nodule volume were measured to assess image quality and accuracy of nodule volumetry. The radiation dose was also estimated.
The contrast-to-noise ratio of SECT120kV/200mAs was significantly higher than that of NBI80/Sn140kV and VMI+80/Sn140kV (both corrected P < 0.05), whereas there were no significant differences between NBI100/sn140kV and SECT120kV/200mAs and between VMI+100/sn140kV and SECT120kV/200mAs (both corrected P > 0.05). The APE of SECT120kV/200mAs was significantly lower than that of NBI80/Sn140kV and VMI+80/Sn140kV in both types of nodules (all corrected P < 0.05), whereas there were no significant differences between VMI+100/sn140kV and SECT120kV/200mAs in solid nodules and between NBI100/Sn140kV and SECT120kV/200mAs in ground-glass opacities (both corrected P > 0.05). The radiation dose of DECT100/Sn140kV and DECT80/Sn140kV were significantly lower than that of SECT120kV/200mAs (both corrected P < 0.05).
The DECT100/sn140kV can ensure image quality and nodule volumetry accuracy with lower radiation dose compared with SECT120kV/200mAs. Specifically, the VMI+ algorithm could be used in solid nodules and NBI algorithm in ground-glass opacities.
本研究旨在评估在双能计算机断层扫描(DECT)中使用噪声优化虚拟单能图像(VMI+)和非线性融合图像(NBI)算法进行肺结节容积测量的准确性。
分别使用DECT80/Sn140kV、DECT100/Sn140kV和单能CT(SECT120kV/200mAs)对带有10个模拟结节(5个实性结节和5个磨玻璃影)的仿真胸部模型进行扫描。使用VMI+(70keV)和NBI算法重建双能图像。测量结节容积的对比噪声比和绝对百分比误差(APE),以评估图像质量和结节容积测量的准确性。同时估算辐射剂量。
SECT120kV/200mAs的对比噪声比显著高于NBI80/Sn140kV和VMI+80/Sn140kV(校正后P均<0.05),而NBI100/sn140kV与SECT120kV/200mAs之间以及VMI+100/sn140kV与SECT120kV/200mAs之间均无显著差异(校正后P均>0.05)。在两种类型的结节中,SECT120kV/200mAs的APE均显著低于NBI80/Sn140kV和VMI+80/Sn140kV(校正后P均<0.05),而在实性结节中VMI+100/sn140kV与SECT120kV/200mAs之间以及在磨玻璃影中NBI100/Sn140kV与SECT120kV/200mAs之间均无显著差异(校正后P均>0.05)。DECT100/Sn140kV和DECT80/Sn140kV的辐射剂量均显著低于SECT120kV/200mAs(校正后P均<0.05)。
与SECT120kV/200mAs相比,DECT100/sn140kV能以较低的辐射剂量确保图像质量和结节容积测量的准确性。具体而言,可以在实性结节中使用VMI+算法,在磨玻璃影中使用NBI算法。