Richards Fayolah, Kodjamanova Petya, Chen Xue, Li Nicole, Atanasov Petar, Bennetts Liga, Patterson Brandon J, Yektashenas Behin, Mesa-Frias Marco, Tronczynski Krzysztof, Buyukkaramikli Nasuh, El Khoury Antoine C
Janssen Global Services, Raritan, NJ, USA.
HEMA Amaris, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2022 Apr 28;14:293-307. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S338225. eCollection 2022.
To review and qualitatively synthesize the evidence related to the economic burden of COVID-19, including healthcare resource utilization and costs.
A systematic review of studies that assessed the economic burden [eg, direct costs, productivity, macroeconomic impact due to non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) and equity] of COVID-19 was conducted by searches in EMBASE, MEDLINE, MEDLINE-IN-PROCESS, and The Cochrane Library, as well as manual searches of unpublished research for the period between January 2020 to February 2021. Single reviewer data extraction was confirmed independently by a second reviewer.
The screening process resulted in a total of 27 studies: 25 individual publications, and 2 systematic literature reviews, of narrower scopes, that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The patients diagnosed with more severe COVID-19 were associated with higher costs. The main drivers for higher costs were consistent across countries and included ICU admission, in-hospital resource use such as mechanical ventilation, which lead to increase costs of $2082.65 ± 345.04 to $2990.76 ± 545.98. The most frequently reported indirect costs were due to productivity losses. On average, older COVID-19 patients incurred higher costs when compared to younger age groups. An estimation of a 20% COVID-19 infection rate based on a Monte Carlo simulation in the United States led to a total direct medical cost of $163.4 billion over the course of the pandemic.
The COVID-19 pandemic has generated a considerable economic burden on patients and the general population. Preventative measures such as NPIs only have partial success in lowering the economic costs of the pandemic. Implementing additional preventative measures such as large-scale vaccination is vital in reducing direct and indirect medical costs, decreased productivity, and GDP losses.
回顾并定性综合与2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)经济负担相关的证据,包括医疗资源利用和成本。
通过检索EMBASE、MEDLINE、MEDLINE在研数据库和考克兰图书馆,以及手动检索2020年1月至2021年2月期间未发表的研究,对评估COVID-19经济负担[如直接成本、生产力、非药物干预(NPIs)导致的宏观经济影响和公平性]的研究进行系统综述。由第二位审阅者独立确认单审阅者的数据提取情况。
筛选过程共产生27项研究:25篇单独发表的文献,以及2篇范围较窄的系统文献综述,这些研究均符合纳入标准。诊断为更严重COVID-19的患者成本更高。各国成本增加的主要驱动因素一致,包括入住重症监护病房(ICU)、住院资源使用(如机械通气),这导致成本增加2082.65±345.04美元至2990.76±545.98美元。最常报告的间接成本是由于生产力损失。平均而言,与年轻年龄组相比,老年COVID-19患者的成本更高。基于美国的蒙特卡洛模拟,估计20%的COVID-19感染率在疫情期间导致的直接医疗总成本为1634亿美元。
COVID-19大流行给患者和普通人群带来了相当大的经济负担。NPIs等预防措施在降低大流行经济成本方面仅取得部分成功。实施大规模疫苗接种等额外预防措施对于降低直接和间接医疗成本、减少生产力下降和国内生产总值损失至关重要。