• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The Need for Risk Stratification Tools in the Pediatric Emergency Department.

作者信息

Balamuth Fran, Alpern Elizabeth R, Scott Halden F

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania;

Division of Emergency Medicine and Pediatric Sepsis Program, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2020 Oct;146(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-022012.

DOI:10.1542/peds.2020-022012
PMID:32978293
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7677964/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
The Need for Risk Stratification Tools in the Pediatric Emergency Department.儿科急诊科对风险分层工具的需求。
Pediatrics. 2020 Oct;146(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-022012.
2
Sepsis patients in the emergency department: stratification using the Clinical Impression Score, Predisposition, Infection, Response and Organ dysfunction score or quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score?急诊科脓毒症患者：使用临床印象评分、易感性、感染、反应和器官功能障碍评分或快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分进行分层？
Eur J Emerg Med. 2018 Oct;25(5):328-334. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000460.
3
The most commonly used disease severity scores are inappropriate for risk stratification of older emergency department sepsis patients: an observational multi-centre study.最常用的疾病严重程度评分不适用于老年急诊科脓毒症患者的风险分层：一项观察性多中心研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Sep 11;25(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0436-3.
4
Utility of SOFA and Δ-SOFA scores for predicting outcome in critically ill patients from the emergency department.SOFA 和 Δ-SOFA 评分对急诊危重症患者预后预测的价值。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2018 Dec;25(6):387-393. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000472.
5
Prognostic accuracy of SIRS criteria and qSOFA score for in-hospital mortality among influenza patients in the emergency department.急诊流感患者中 SIRS 标准和 qSOFA 评分对院内死亡率的预后准确性。
BMC Infect Dis. 2020 May 29;20(1):385. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05102-7.
6
Recognizing critically ill children with a modified pediatric early warning score at the emergency department, a feasibility study.在急诊科使用改良儿科早期预警评分识别危重症患儿的可行性研究。
Eur J Pediatr. 2019 Feb;178(2):229-234. doi: 10.1007/s00431-018-3285-9. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
7
Low sensitivity of qSOFA, SIRS criteria and sepsis definition to identify infected patients at risk of complication in the prehospital setting and at the emergency department triage.qSOFA、SIRS 标准和脓毒症定义对识别院前环境和急诊科分诊中感染风险患者的并发症的敏感性较低。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Nov 3;25(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0449-y.
8
Accuracy of the qSOFA Score and RED Sign in Predicting Critical Care Requirements in Patients with Suspected Infection in the Emergency Department: A Retrospective Observational Study.qSOFA 评分和 RED 征象在预测急诊科疑似感染患者重症监护需求中的准确性：一项回顾性观察研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Jan 19;56(1):42. doi: 10.3390/medicina56010042.
9
Assessment of clinical outcome of children with sepsis outside the intensive care unit.评估重症监护室外脓毒症患儿的临床转归。
Eur J Pediatr. 2018 Dec;177(12):1775-1783. doi: 10.1007/s00431-018-3247-2. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
10
Predictive performance of the SOFA and mSOFA scoring systems for predicting in-hospital mortality in the emergency department.SOFA 和 mSOFA 评分系统对急诊科住院患者病死率预测的预测性能。
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Jul;37(7):1237-1241. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.09.011. Epub 2018 Sep 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between mortality and critical events within 48 hours of transfer to the pediatric intensive care unit.转入儿科重症监护病房后48小时内死亡率与危急事件之间的关联。
Front Pediatr. 2023 Dec 21;11:1284672. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1284672. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Accuracy of a Modified qSOFA Score for Predicting Critical Care Admission in Febrile Children.改良 qSOFA 评分对预测发热儿童入住重症监护病房的准确性。
Pediatrics. 2020 Oct;146(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-0782.
2
A narrative review of heart rate and variability in sepsis.脓毒症中心率与变异性的叙述性综述。
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Jun;8(12):768. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-148.
3
Improving Recognition of Pediatric Severe Sepsis in the Emergency Department: Contributions of a Vital Sign-Based Electronic Alert and Bedside Clinician Identification.提高急诊科对儿童严重脓毒症的识别能力：基于生命体征的电子警报和床边临床医生识别的作用
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Dec;70(6):759-768.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.03.019. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
4
Prediction of pediatric sepsis mortality within 1 h of intensive care admission.重症监护入院 1 小时内儿童脓毒症死亡率的预测。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Aug;43(8):1085-1096. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4701-8. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
5
Association Between Early Lactate Levels and 30-Day Mortality in Clinically Suspected Sepsis in Children.临床疑似脓毒症患儿早期血乳酸水平与 30 天死亡率的关系。
JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Mar 1;171(3):249-255. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.3681.
6
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义（脓毒症-3）》
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
7
Heart rate variability analysis is more sensitive at identifying neonatal sepsis than conventional vital signs.心率变异性分析在识别新生儿败血症方面比传统生命体征更敏感。
Am J Surg. 2015 Oct;210(4):661-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.06.002. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
8
Incidence and recognition of elevated triage blood pressure in the pediatric emergency department.儿科急诊科分诊时血压升高的发生率及识别情况。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011 Oct;27(10):922-7. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3182307a4b.