• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在复合生态系统中运用美景度评价法对景观资源进行评估。

Assessment of landscape resource using the scenic beauty estimation method at compound ecological system.

作者信息

Mo Lichun, Chen Jiancheng, Xie Yi

机构信息

School of Economics & Management, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100083, China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Feb;28(5):5892-5899. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10978-8. Epub 2020 Sep 25.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-020-10978-8
PMID:32978736
Abstract

Landscape resource assessment of compound ecological system is the basic condition for planning various management activities. After field survey and obtaining landscape photos of the Badaling region, we built the evaluation system of landscape resources. Then, we recruited people to evaluate the indicators of different scenic spots with evaluation system and overall evaluation by scenic beauty estimation method (SBE). The results showed that A01 and A05 gave a good impression to tourists from the point of view of scenic spots. Judging from the evaluation indicators, the entire region had a high score in geological landscape, while some of the scenic spots had low scores in humanity landscape. Overall evaluation has better practicability for the area with better landscape. The two evaluation methods are consistent in evaluating good landscape by SBE, through analyzing the main reasons for the differences in evaluation. The results and methodology can benefit landscape resource assessments as well as provide support on planning and management for compound ecological system.

摘要

复合生态系统景观资源评价是开展各类管理活动规划的基本条件。在对八达岭地区进行实地调查并获取景观照片后,我们构建了景观资源评价体系。然后,招募人员采用美景度评价法(SBE),利用评价体系对不同景点指标进行评价及综合评价。结果表明,从景点角度来看,A01和A05给游客留下了良好印象。从评价指标来看,整个区域地质景观得分较高,而部分景点人文景观得分较低。综合评价对于景观较好的区域具有更好的实用性。通过分析评价差异的主要原因,两种评价方法在采用SBE评价优质景观方面具有一致性。研究结果和方法有助于景观资源评价,也为复合生态系统的规划与管理提供支持。

相似文献

1
Assessment of landscape resource using the scenic beauty estimation method at compound ecological system.在复合生态系统中运用美景度评价法对景观资源进行评估。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Feb;28(5):5892-5899. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10978-8. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
2
Dynamic response of the scenic beauty value of different forests to various thinning intensities in central eastern China.不同林分密度对中国中东部不同森林风景美学价值的动态响应。
Environ Monit Assess. 2014 Nov;186(11):7413-29. doi: 10.1007/s10661-014-3937-9. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
3
How the ecological structure affects the aesthetic atmosphere of the landscape: Evaluation of the landscape Beauty of Xingqing Palace Park in Xi'an.生态结构如何影响景观的美感氛围——以西安兴庆宫公园为例的景观美感评价。
PLoS One. 2024 May 15;19(5):e0302855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302855. eCollection 2024.
4
Evaluation of the winter landscape of the plant community of urban park green spaces based on the scenic beauty esitimation method in Yangzhou, China.基于风景美学评价法对中国扬州城市公园绿地植物群落冬季景观的评价
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 2;15(10):e0239849. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239849. eCollection 2020.
5
[Spatial planning of Qingyun Mountain scenic spot in Benxi, Northeast China based on ecological sensitivity assessment.].基于生态敏感性评价的中国东北本溪青云山风景名胜区空间规划
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2019 Jul;30(7):2352-2360. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201907.037.
6
[Landscape quality evaluation and vertical structure optimization of natural broadleaf forest].天然阔叶林景观质量评价与垂直结构优化
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2007 Jun;18(6):1388-92.
7
Measurement of Scenic Spots Sustainable Capacity Based on PCA-Entropy TOPSIS: A Case Study from 30 Provinces, China.基于 PCA-Entropy TOPSIS 的景区可持续容量测度——来自中国 30 个省份的案例研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Dec 22;15(1):10. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15010010.
8
Bridging beauty and biodiversity: Coupling diversity and aesthetics through optimized plant communities in urban riverfront landscapes.桥接美丽与生物多样性:通过城市滨水景观中优化的植物群落实现多样性与美学的结合。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Nov 10;950:175278. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175278. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
9
Index system and method for the evaluation of highway ecological landscape quality: A case study of Nantong City, Jiangsu Province, China.公路生态景观质量评价指标体系与方法:以中国江苏省南通市为例
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2018 Dec;29(12):4128-4134. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201812.012.
10
[Low-carbon behavioral performance of scenic spots and the driving mechanism: A case study of Zhangjiajie World Heritage Site.].[景区低碳行为表现及其驱动机制:以张家界世界遗产地为例。]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2019 Jan 20;30(1):266-276. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201901.020.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparative study of the perception of traditional villages between different media.不同媒介对传统村落认知的比较研究
Sci Rep. 2025 May 8;15(1):16062. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00841-6.
2
The key to improving the beauty of the giant retaining wall in valleys: Increasing visual extension.提高山谷大型挡土墙美观的关键:增加视觉延伸。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 29;18(6):e0287251. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287251. eCollection 2023.
3
Implementation of the visual aesthetic quality of slope forest autumn color change into the configuration of tree species.
将坡面林秋季变色的视觉美学质量融入到树种配置中。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 20;12(1):1034. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04317-1.
4
Can Residential Greenspace Exposure Improve Pain Experience? A Comparison between Physical Visit and Image Viewing.居住空间的绿地接触能否改善疼痛体验?实地参观与图像观看的比较。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Jul 20;9(7):918. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9070918.