Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy.
Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
J Health Organ Manag. 2020 Sep 28;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi: 10.1108/JHOM-11-2019-0316.
This study aims to describe and understand the contributions of frontline, middle and top management healthcare professionals in detecting areas of potential improvement in hospital patient flow and proposing solutions.
DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: This is a qualitative interview study. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 22 professionals in the orthopedic department of a 250-bed academic teaching hospital. Data were analyzed through a thematic framework analytical approach by using an framework. The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative (COREQ) checklist for qualitative studies was followed.
When dealing with a hospital-wide process, the involvement of all professionals, including nonhealth professionals, can reveal priority areas for improvement and for services integration. The improvements identified by the professionals largely focus on covering major gaps detected in the technical and administrative quality.
RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: This study focused on the professional viewpoint and the connections between services and further studies should explore the role of patient involvement. The study design could limit the generalizability of findings.
Improving high-quality, efficient hospital patient flow cannot be accomplished without learning the perspective of the healthcare professionals on the process of service delivery.
ORIGINALITY/VALUE: Few qualitative studies explore professionals' perspectives on patient needs in hospital flow management. This study provides insights into what produces value for the patient within a complex process by analyzing the contribution of professionals from their particular role in the organization.
本研究旨在描述和理解一线、中层和高层医疗保健专业人员在发现医院患者流程中的潜在改进领域并提出解决方案方面的贡献。
设计/方法/途径:这是一项定性访谈研究。对 250 张床位的学术教学医院骨科的 22 名专业人员进行了半结构化访谈。通过使用框架的主题框架分析方法对数据进行分析。遵循了定性研究的统一报告标准(COREQ)检查表。
在处理全院范围的流程时,包括非卫生专业人员在内的所有专业人员的参与可以揭示改进的优先领域和服务整合。专业人员确定的改进主要集中在弥补技术和管理质量方面发现的重大差距。
研究局限性/影响:本研究侧重于专业人员的观点,以及服务之间的联系,应进一步研究患者参与的作用。研究设计可能会限制研究结果的普遍性。
如果不了解医疗保健专业人员对服务提供过程的看法,就无法改善高质量、高效率的医院患者流程。
原创性/价值:很少有定性研究探讨专业人员对医院流程管理中患者需求的看法。通过分析组织中特定角色的专业人员的贡献,本研究深入了解了在复杂流程中为患者创造价值的因素。