School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia.
MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Mar 1;11(3):383-385. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.176.
The issue of public health and policy communities engaging with food sector companies has long caused tension and debate. Ralston and colleagues' article 'Towards Preventing and Managing Conflict of Interest in Nutrition Policy? An Analysis of Submissions to a Consultation on a Draft WHO Tool' further examines this issue. They found widespread food industry opposition, not just to the details of the World Health Organization (WHO) tool, but to the very idea of it. In this commentary we reflect on this finding and the arguments for and against interacting with the food industry during different stages of the policy process. While involving the food industry in certain aspects of the policy process without favouring their business goals may seem like an intractable problem, we believe there are opportunities for progress that do not compromise our values as public health professionals. We suggest three key steps to making progress.
公共卫生和政策界与食品行业公司互动的问题长期以来一直引起紧张和争议。Ralston 及其同事的文章“防止和管理营养政策中的利益冲突?对世界卫生组织(WHO)工具草案咨询意见的分析”进一步探讨了这个问题。他们发现,不仅是食品行业广泛反对,不仅是对世卫组织工具的细节,而是对其本身的反对。在这篇评论中,我们反思了这一发现以及在政策制定过程的不同阶段与食品行业互动的利弊。虽然在政策制定过程的某些方面让食品行业参与进来而不偏袒他们的商业目标,可能看起来是一个棘手的问题,但我们认为,有机会取得进展而不损害我们作为公共卫生专业人员的价值观。我们提出了三个关键步骤来取得进展。