Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
World Vegetable Center, Bangkok, Thailand.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Mar 1;11(3):391-393. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.177.
Actual or perceived conflict of interests (COIs) among public and private actors in the field of nutrition must be managed. Ralston et al expose sharply contrasting views on the new World Health Organization (WHO) COI management tool, highlighting the contested nature of global debates. Both the WHO COI tool and the Ralston et al paper are largely quiet on aspects of power among different actors, however, which we argue is integral to these conflicts. We suggest that power needs to be acknowledged as a factor in COI; that it needs to be systematically assessed in COI tools using approaches we outline here; and that it needs to be explicitly addressed through COI mechanisms. We would recommend that all actors in the nutrition space (not only private companies) are held to the same COI standards, and we would welcome further studies such as Ralston et al to further build accountability.
必须管理营养领域的公共和私营行为体之间的实际或感知到的利益冲突(COI)。Ralston 等人对世界卫生组织(WHO)新的 COI 管理工具提出了截然不同的观点,突出了全球辩论的争议性。然而,WHO COI 工具和 Ralston 等人的论文在不同行为体之间的权力方面基本上保持沉默,我们认为这是这些冲突的组成部分。我们认为,需要将权力视为 COI 的一个因素;需要使用我们在此处概述的方法在 COI 工具中系统地评估权力;并且需要通过 COI 机制明确解决。我们建议营养领域的所有行为体(不仅是私营公司)都应遵守相同的 COI 标准,我们欢迎像 Ralston 等人这样的进一步研究来进一步提高问责制。