• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青少年与成人鼻咽癌预后的比较:一项倾向评分匹配分析

Comparison of Prognosis Between Juvenile and Adult Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

作者信息

Chen Chuanben, Chen Qinyan, Xu Yuanji, Zheng Wei, Lin Zhizhong, Wu Zijie, Ye Wangzhong, Huang Xinyi, Lin Xiurong, Bai Penggang

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou 350014, Fujian Province, People's Republic of China.

Graduate School, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350000, Fujian Province, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Cancer Manag Res. 2020 Sep 18;12:8613-8621. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S260402. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.2147/CMAR.S260402
PMID:32982452
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7509313/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate whether juvenile patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in China have better prognosis than their adult counterparts in the intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) era, after controlling for potential confounding variables.

METHODS

Data pertaining to 1139 patients with newly diagnosed NPC without metastasis, who were treated with IMRT at our hospital, were retrospectively analyzed. Of these, 60 patients were juvenile (age ≤18 years) diagnosed between January 2003 and December 2018, while 1079 patients were adults (≤65 years) diagnosed between January 2013 and December 2014. To minimize the influence of selection and confounding bias, 1:2 propensity score matching (PSM) was used. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and between-group differences assessed using the Log rank test. The long-term toxicity of the juvenile patients was evaluated according to the criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.

RESULTS

Five-year OS of juvenile and adult patients were 88.07% and 85.08%, respectively. Before PSM, OS, PFS, DMFS, or LRFS were comparable in the two groups (all > 0.05). After PSM, OS, DFS, and LRFS in the juvenile group were markedly longer than that in adults ( = 0.005, = 0.027, and = 0.024, respectively). With respect to long-term toxicity, the most common adverse effects in juvenile patients were cervix fibrosis, ototoxicity, and xerostomia. However, except for two patients who developed grade 3 ototoxicity, all adverse effects were within grade 2.

CONCLUSION

In the IMRT era, juvenile Chinese patients with NPC had better 5-year OS, DFS, and LRFS than their adult counterparts. The adverse events in the juvenile cohort were relatively mild; however, the risk of severe ototoxicity should not be neglected.

摘要

目的

在控制潜在混杂变量后,研究中国鼻咽癌(NPC)青少年患者在调强放射治疗(IMRT)时代的预后是否优于成年患者。

方法

回顾性分析我院1139例初诊无转移的NPC患者接受IMRT治疗的数据。其中,60例为青少年患者(年龄≤18岁),于2003年1月至2018年12月确诊,1079例为成年患者(≤65岁),于2013年1月至2014年12月确诊。为尽量减少选择和混杂偏倚的影响,采用1:2倾向评分匹配(PSM)。采用Kaplan-Meier法估计总生存期(OS)、无病生存期(DFS)、局部区域无复发生存期(LRFS)和远处转移无复发生存期(DMFS),并采用Log rank检验评估组间差异。根据放射肿瘤学组(RTOG)标准和不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE)第5.0版评估青少年患者长期毒性。

结果

青少年和成年患者的5年总生存率分别为88.07%和85.08%。在PSM之前,两组的总生存期、无进展生存期、远处转移无复发生存期或局部区域无复发生存期均具有可比性(均>0.05)。PSM后,青少年组的总生存期、无病生存期和局部区域无复发生存期明显长于成年组(分别为P = 0.005、P = 0.027和P = 0.024)。关于长期毒性,青少年患者最常见的不良反应是颈部纤维化、耳毒性和口干。然而,除2例发生3级耳毒性的患者外,所有不良反应均在2级以内。

结论

在IMRT时代,中国青少年NPC患者的5年总生存期、无病生存期和局部区域无复发生存期优于成年患者。青少年队列中的不良事件相对较轻;然而,严重耳毒性的风险不容忽视。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3863/7509313/aff6e6986f54/CMAR-12-8613-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3863/7509313/c6529e6e0378/CMAR-12-8613-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3863/7509313/aff6e6986f54/CMAR-12-8613-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3863/7509313/c6529e6e0378/CMAR-12-8613-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3863/7509313/aff6e6986f54/CMAR-12-8613-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Prognosis Between Juvenile and Adult Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.青少年与成人鼻咽癌预后的比较:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Cancer Manag Res. 2020 Sep 18;12:8613-8621. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S260402. eCollection 2020.
2
Clinical outcome of intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Comparative study at SKIMS Tertiary Care Institute.局部晚期鼻咽癌调强放疗与二维常规放疗的临床结果:SKIMS 三级护理研究所的对比研究。
J Cancer Res Ther. 2022 Jan-Mar;18(1):133-139. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_169_21.
3
Propensity score matching analysis of cisplatin-based concurrent chemotherapy in low risk nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy era.调强放射治疗时代基于顺铂的同步化疗在低危鼻咽癌中的倾向评分匹配分析
Oncotarget. 2015 Dec 22;6(41):44019-29. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5806.
4
Effect of adaptive replanning in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated by intensity-modulated radiotherapy: a propensity score matched analysis.调强放疗治疗局部晚期鼻咽癌患者中适应性再计划的效果:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Clin Transl Oncol. 2017 Apr;19(4):470-476. doi: 10.1007/s12094-016-1551-8. Epub 2016 Oct 7.
5
Treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma with intensity-modulated radiotherapy: the Hong Kong experience.调强放射治疗鼻咽癌:香港的经验
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Dec 1;60(5):1440-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.05.022.
6
Propensity score matching analysis of a phase II study on simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy using helical tomotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinomas.一项关于使用螺旋断层放疗对鼻咽癌进行同步调强加速放疗的II期研究的倾向评分匹配分析。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Aug 29;17(1):582. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3581-1.
7
Effect of intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.调强放射治疗与单纯二维传统放射治疗对鼻咽癌的疗效比较
Oncotarget. 2016 May 31;7(22):33408-17. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8573.
8
Prognostic value of hepatitis B viral infection in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy era.调强放疗时代鼻咽癌患者乙型肝炎病毒感染的预后价值
Transl Cancer Res. 2021 Nov;10(11):4624-4635. doi: 10.21037/tcr-21-1340.
9
Comparison of the efficacy between intensity-modulated radiotherapy and two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy in stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma.调强放疗与二维常规放疗治疗Ⅱ期鼻咽癌的疗效比较。
Oncotarget. 2017 Apr 27;8(44):78096-78104. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.17481. eCollection 2017 Sep 29.
10
Outcomes of adding induction chemotherapy to concurrent chemoradiotherapy for stage T3N0-1 nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a propensity-matched study.T3N0-1期鼻咽癌同步放化疗联合诱导化疗的疗效:一项倾向评分匹配研究
Onco Targets Ther. 2017 Aug 1;10:3853-3860. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S133917. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Paclitaxel liposome, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil-based induction chemotherapy followed by de-escalated intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin in stage IVA-IVB childhood nasopharyngeal carcinoma in endemic area: a phase II, single-arm trial.紫杉醇脂质体、顺铂和氟尿嘧啶诱导化疗,随后对高发地区IVA-IVB期儿童鼻咽癌患者进行强度降低的调强放疗并同步使用顺铂:一项II期单臂试验。
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2023 Aug 31;40:100895. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100895. eCollection 2023 Nov.
2
Epidemiology and treatment of head and neck malignancies in the AYA generation.青少年和年轻成人头颈部恶性肿瘤的流行病学和治疗。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar;27(3):465-472. doi: 10.1007/s10147-021-02093-6. Epub 2022 Jan 14.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes and Sequelae Between Children and Adult Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Treated With Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy.儿童与成人鼻咽癌调强放疗的长期疗效和后遗症比较。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 Mar 15;106(4):848-856. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.11.035. Epub 2019 Nov 30.
2
Assessment of Nasopharyngeal Cancer in Young Patients Aged ≤ 30 Years.30岁及以下年轻患者的鼻咽癌评估
Front Oncol. 2019 Nov 6;9:1179. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01179. eCollection 2019.
3
Treatment of Childhood Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma With Induction Chemotherapy and Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy: Results of the Children's Oncology Group ARAR0331 Study.
Combination of Epithelial Growth Factor Receptor Blockers and CDK4/6 Inhibitor for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Treatment.
表皮生长因子受体阻滞剂与CDK4/6抑制剂联合用于鼻咽癌治疗
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jun 12;13(12):2954. doi: 10.3390/cancers13122954.
儿童鼻咽癌诱导化疗和同期放化疗治疗:儿童肿瘤学组 ARAR0331 研究结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Dec 10;37(35):3369-3376. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01276. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
4
Update in pediatric nasopharyngeal undifferentiated carcinoma.儿童鼻咽未分化癌的最新进展。
Br J Radiol. 2019 Oct;92(1102):20190107. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20190107. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
5
Adapted strategy to tumor response in childhood nasopharyngeal carcinoma: the French experience.适应儿童鼻咽癌肿瘤反应的策略:法国经验。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2019 Jun;195(6):504-516. doi: 10.1007/s00066-019-01461-6. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
6
Late Sequelae of Childhood and Adolescent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Survivors After Radiation Therapy.儿童和青少年鼻咽癌放疗后晚期后遗症。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Jan 1;103(1):45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.09.015. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
7
Association between genetic polymorphisms and platinum-induced ototoxicity in children.儿童基因多态性与铂类药物所致耳毒性之间的关联
Oncotarget. 2018 Jul 20;9(56):30883-30893. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.25767.
8
A retrospective study comparing the outcomes and toxicities of intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy for the treatment of children and adolescent nasopharyngeal carcinoma.一项回顾性研究,比较调强放射治疗与二维传统放射治疗在儿童及青少年鼻咽癌治疗中的疗效和毒性。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017 Aug;143(8):1563-1572. doi: 10.1007/s00432-017-2401-y. Epub 2017 Mar 25.
9
Prognostic aspects in the treatment of juvenile nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review.青少年鼻咽癌治疗中的预后因素:一项系统评价
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Mar;274(3):1205-1214. doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-4154-7. Epub 2016 Jun 18.
10
Factors Associated With Mortality in Pediatric vs Adult Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.儿童与成人鼻咽癌死亡率相关因素
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Mar;142(3):217-22. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2015.3217.